Am 22.05.2010 23:02, schrieb Eduardo Martins Lopes:
Hello all,
I uploaded a package with the wrong name, the package upc should be named
gccupc for UPC is a programming language for which there are several compilers
(gccupc is only one of it).
I already corrected in my pkgbuild and therefore w
Hello all,
I uploaded a package with the wrong name, the package upc should be named
gccupc for UPC is a programming language for which there are several compilers
(gccupc is only one of it).
I already corrected in my pkgbuild and therefore would like to ask for the
deletion of the previous on
On 22/05/10 18:27, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote:
Hello
Please delete eglibc-2.11-svn [#1] that is replaced now by
eglibc-2.12-svn [#2].
Thanks.
[#1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32130
[#2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37370
Done.
Hello
Please delete eglibc-2.11-svn [#1] that is replaced now by
eglibc-2.12-svn [#2].
Thanks.
[#1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32130
[#2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37370
--
Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
\cos^2\alpha + \sin^2\alpha = 1
On 05/22/2010 05:23 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
On 05/22/2010 04:58 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
Hi,
The TODO list has been created for this "rebuild". Obviously no rush on
this one given it is not a real rebuild. And remember to consider
whether the package really needs to stay in [community] given many h
On 23/05/10 00:37, Chris Brannon wrote:
Allan McRae wrote:
Given these packages are obviously not updated much, it would be good to
give them a rebuild to get new packaging policies in place such as:
*SNIP*
- package() functions
Hi,
Should we always have a package() function? Are there s
On 05/22/2010 05:28 PM, Xyne wrote:
The TODO list has been created for this "rebuild".
link?
archlinux.org/login and then click on todos
--
Ionut
Allan McRae wrote:
> Given these packages are obviously not updated much, it would be good to
> give them a rebuild to get new packaging policies in place such as:
*SNIP*
> - package() functions
Hi,
Should we always have a package() function? Are there situations
in which it is not appropriate
> The TODO list has been created for this "rebuild".
link?
On 05/22/2010 04:58 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
Hi,
The TODO list has been created for this "rebuild". Obviously no rush on
this one given it is not a real rebuild. And remember to consider
whether the package really needs to stay in [community] given many have
not been updated in ages.
Cheers,
Alla
Hi,
The TODO list has been created for this "rebuild". Obviously no rush on
this one given it is not a real rebuild. And remember to consider
whether the package really needs to stay in [community] given many have
not been updated in ages.
Cheers,
Allan
11 matches
Mail list logo