t
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 1:27 AM, Bernhard Walle wrote:
> Am 28.08.10 07:30, schrieb Nathan O:
> >>
> >> Still says that grep -R $(pwd)/src pkg/
> > Binary file pkg/usr/bin/fqterm.bin matches
>
> Could you search for the string in a text editor (one that has no
> problem with binary files like
Am 28.08.10 07:30, schrieb Nathan O:
>>
>> Still says that grep -R $(pwd)/src pkg/
> Binary file pkg/usr/bin/fqterm.bin matches
Could you search for the string in a text editor (one that has no
problem with binary files like vim) or just use 'strings' and tell us in
which context the string occurs
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 6:35 AM, Thorsten Töpper
wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 01:25:37 -0500
> Nathan O wrote:
> > Also another package I am requesting to be deleted is frupple
> > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28699 It doesn't run. I would
> > attempt to send a bug report to the autho
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 8:45 AM, Mikhail Vorozhtsov
wrote:
> Hi, TUs.
>
> Please remove my lib32-libsamplerate package[1] (it is in [multilib]
> now).
>
> [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31550
Done.
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 7:53 AM, corvolino wrote:
> Sorry Evangelos. the package is:
>
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26897
Deleted.
Hi, TUs.
Please remove my lib32-libsamplerate package[1] (it is in [multilib]
now).
[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31550
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 12:18 AM, Nathan O wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 6:43 AM, Bernhard Walle wrote:
>
>> Am 27.08.2010 13:08, schrieb Ray Rashif:
>> >
>> > cmake . -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr \
>> >-DCMAKE_SKIP_RPATH=ON
>>
>> Also build the release version with '-DCMAKE
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 6:41 AM, Thorsten Töpper
wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 13:40:20 +0200
> Wieland Hoffmann wrote:
> > On 27.08.2010 08:07, Nathan O wrote:
> > > Can somebody delete FSirc
> > > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20459 . The author no
> > > longer has it listed on his si
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 6:43 AM, Bernhard Walle wrote:
> Am 27.08.2010 13:08, schrieb Ray Rashif:
> >
> > cmake . -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr \
> >-DCMAKE_SKIP_RPATH=ON
>
> Also build the release version with '-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release',
> because otherwise the binary contains re
Sorry Evangelos. the package is:
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26897
Jan Steffens wrote:
> You got the wrong Jan. :p
What? I thought they were all interchangeable.
2010/8/28 Ng Oon-Ee :
> On Sat, 2010-08-28 at 03:38 +0200, Jan Steffens wrote:
>> 2010/8/28 Ng Oon-Ee :
>> > Should I just adopt this package to update it and orphan it? Or is it
>> > more polite to wait for Pierre since I think its his package based on
>> > the name there. Or does the orphan indic
On Sat, 2010-08-28 at 03:38 +0200, Jan Steffens wrote:
> 2010/8/28 Ng Oon-Ee :
> > Should I just adopt this package to update it and orphan it? Or is it
> > more polite to wait for Pierre since I think its his package based on
> > the name there. Or does the orphan indicate he doesn't want this pac
Hey,
I was angling for that one :-P
Note that I had crated a patch to the newer of the packages and it is
attached as a comment. How does your patch compare to mine?
I sent an email to the maintainer (clamy) earlier this week and have heard
nothing back as yet.
I was going to adopt it, but if
2010/8/28 Ng Oon-Ee :
> Should I just adopt this package to update it and orphan it? Or is it
> more polite to wait for Pierre since I think its his package based on
> the name there. Or does the orphan indicate he doesn't want this package
> anymore?
An orphaned package is orphaned.
If you can he
Hi all,
Just realized http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11191 is
orphaned, and that there's quite a few comments below specifying exactly
how to update it.
Considering how many packages depend on it, I'm surprised its orphaned,
but when I checked the PKGBUILD its a well-recognized name.
S
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 1:39 AM, Pierre Bourdon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could you please delete gdb-archer-python-git [1] ? It is not needed
> anymore as gdb in [extra] now supports Python scripting.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36034
>
> --
> Pierre "delroth" B
Hi,
Could you please delete gdb-archer-python-git [1] ? It is not needed
anymore as gdb in [extra] now supports Python scripting.
Thanks in advance,
[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36034
--
Pierre "delroth" Bourdon
Étudiant à l'EPITA / Student at EPITA
http://bitbucket.org/delrot
Am 27.08.2010 14:47, schrieb Adam Hani Schakaki:
> Hello,
> Please orphan dconf [1] since it wasn't updated for over five weeks now. The
> first correction proposal is written on 20th July and now we got two new
> version since the latest update in the AUR.
>
> [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packa
Am 27.08.2010 16:27, schrieb René Herman:
> Good day.
>
> [this same message has been hanging in the non-subscriber moderation queue
> for a few days now]
>
> I'm a recent arch user (but longtime linux user) and would like to adopt the
> x48 package, an emulator for the HP-48 scientific calcula
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 10:23 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> With the creation of the [multilib] repository, all 32-bit libraries are
> now installed in /usr/lib32 and compiled from source using the
> gcc-multilib package instead of being copied from i686 packages. All AUR
> users maintaining lib32-*
With the creation of the [multilib] repository, all 32-bit libraries are
now installed in /usr/lib32 and compiled from source using the
gcc-multilib package instead of being copied from i686 packages. All AUR
users maintaining lib32-* and bin32-* packages are encouraged to adapt
their packages to t
Excerpts from Alexander Duscheleit's message of 2010-08-27 21:31:29 +0200:
> On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 15:22:03 +0100
> Peter Lewis wrote:
>
> > On Thursday 26 August 2010 at 18:57 Alexander Duscheleit wrote:
> > > Philipp Überbacher wrote:
> > > > Besides that, I think it's future proof.
> > > > One
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 15:22:03 +0100
Peter Lewis wrote:
> On Thursday 26 August 2010 at 18:57 Alexander Duscheleit wrote:
> > Philipp Überbacher wrote:
> > > Besides that, I think it's future proof.
> > > One issue though is that the meaning of:
> > > ('GPL2' 'GPL3')
> > > isn't the same as:
> > >
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 11:43 AM, ALAUX, Guillaume wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This package
>
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26823
>
> is out of date, orphan and is a duplicate of
>
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26803
>
> I think we should delete it.
>
> Guillaume
>
Target has been
Hi,
This package
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26823
is out of date, orphan and is a duplicate of
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26803
I think we should delete it.
Guillaume
Good day.
[this same message has been hanging in the non-subscriber moderation
queue for a few days now]
I'm a recent arch user (but longtime linux user) and would like to adopt
the x48 package, an emulator for the HP-48 scientific calculator.
There are two versions of the package on the AU
On Thursday 26 August 2010 at 18:57 Alexander Duscheleit wrote:
> Philipp Überbacher wrote:
> > Besides that, I think it's future proof.
> > One issue though is that the meaning of:
> > ('GPL2' 'GPL3')
> > isn't the same as:
> > 'GPL2 or later'
> > It only is practically the same because there's n
Hello,
Please orphan dconf [1] since it wasn't updated for over five weeks now. The
first correction proposal is written on 20th July and now we got two new
version since the latest update in the AUR.
[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38530
Adam Hani Schakaki
Am 27.08.2010 13:08, schrieb Ray Rashif:
>
> cmake . -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr \
>-DCMAKE_SKIP_RPATH=ON
Also build the release version with '-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release',
because otherwise the binary contains references to the source code so
that gdb finds the source files.
Reg
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 13:40:20 +0200
Wieland Hoffmann wrote:
> On 27.08.2010 08:07, Nathan O wrote:
> > Can somebody delete FSirc
> > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20459 . The author no
> > longer has it listed on his site, and I found a git page for it,
> > but the last update was in 200
Thorsten Töpper writes:
> Hello,
>
> The discussion period has ended, 120h since my confirmation have passed
If you can believe email headers, the discussion period lasted 120
hours, 39 minutes, and 44 seconds, to be precise.
Date:Sun, 22 Aug 2010 12:46:14 +0200
To: aur-general@archlin
On 27.08.2010 08:07, Nathan O wrote:
> Can somebody delete FSirc http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20459 .
> The author no longer has it listed on his site, and I found a git page for
> it, but the last update was in 2008.
It still builds, starts and connects.
> Nothing is listed as depend
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 01:25:37 -0500
Nathan O wrote:
> Also another package I am requesting to be deleted is frupple
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28699 It doesn't run. I would
> attempt to send a bug report to the author, but it seems the author no
> longer maintains it anymore. If I r
Hello,
The discussion period has ended, 120h since my confirmation have passed
so it's time to vote. Log into the AUR and give your vote to the fourth
currently running vote process (and every other where you haven't done
so yet).
Good luck Florian.
And now vote or no cookies for no one! :-P
T
On 27 August 2010 15:55, Nathan O wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 2:50 AM, Magnus Therning wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 08:44, Nathan O wrote:
>> > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 2:41 AM, Magnus Therning > >wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 08:30, Nathan O wrote:
>> >> > On Fri, Aug 27,
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 1:49 PM, F B wrote:
> Hi, please delete these packages
>
> wolf-bin32 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29506
> dib0700-firmware http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23033
>
> wolf now support x86_64 so the first one is unuseful, dib0700-firmware is
> provided b
Hi, please delete these packages
wolf-bin32 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29506
dib0700-firmware http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23033
wolf now support x86_64 so the first one is unuseful, dib0700-firmware is
provided by linux-firmware.
Thank you in advance.
@Nathan O: I used startdir absolute path (instead of relative path).
Actually it should be ../../../grub2-efi-bzr.install
[quote Nathan Wayde]
I'm just making noise here, but I really don't think that .install file
should be doing what it's currently doing.
such as:
`cp /usr/lib/${_trns_name}/${
On 27/08/10 09:04, Nathan O wrote:
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 2:59 AM, KESHAV P.R. wrote:
Please delete packages -
grub2-efi-x64-bzr http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39901 and
grub2-efi-x86-bzr http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39902 .
The packages have been merged (based on tpow
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 2:59 AM, KESHAV P.R. wrote:
> Please delete packages -
>
> grub2-efi-x64-bzr http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39901 and
> grub2-efi-x86-bzr http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39902 .
>
> The packages have been merged (based on tpowa's suggestion) and
> replac
2010/8/27 Stephen Weinberg :
> On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 08:42:51 +0100
>
>>
>> My concern is more about using tools to automatically get updates. I
>> see no way of using any established tools to do that :-(
>>
>> /M
>>
>
> Should I modify my package to install or repackage their package?
>
Hi, I
Please delete packages -
grub2-efi-x64-bzr http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39901 and
grub2-efi-x86-bzr http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39902 .
The packages have been merged (based on tpowa's suggestion) and
replaced by grub2-efi-bzr
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40290
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 2:50 AM, Magnus Therning wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 08:44, Nathan O wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 2:41 AM, Magnus Therning >wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 08:30, Nathan O wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 2:28 AM, Magnus Therning >> >wrote:
> >>
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 08:44, Nathan O wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 2:41 AM, Magnus Therning wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 08:30, Nathan O wrote:
>> > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 2:28 AM, Magnus Therning > >wrote:
>> [...]
>> > That is weird that you got grep to tell you which file(s) it w
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 08:42:51 +0100
Magnus Therning wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 08:36, Nathan Wayde
> wrote:
> > On 27/08/10 08:30, Magnus Therning wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 08:15, Stephen Weinberg
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> My package, godesk
> >>> (http://aur.archlinux.org/pac
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 2:41 AM, Magnus Therning wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 08:30, Nathan O wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 2:28 AM, Magnus Therning >wrote:
> [...]
> > That is weird that you got grep to tell you which file(s) it was, when
> mine
> > pointed nothing out to me.
>
> Indee
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 08:36, Nathan Wayde wrote:
> On 27/08/10 08:30, Magnus Therning wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 08:15, Stephen Weinberg
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> My package, godesk (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37635), is
>>> no longer needed. Apparently the archlinux community (
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 08:30, Nathan O wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 2:28 AM, Magnus Therning wrote:
[...]
> That is weird that you got grep to tell you which file(s) it was, when mine
> pointed nothing out to me.
Indeed. This is what I see:
% grep -R $(pwd)/src pkg
Binary file pkg/usr/
On 27/08/10 08:30, Magnus Therning wrote:
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 08:15, Stephen Weinberg wrote:
My package, godesk (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37635), is
no longer needed. Apparently the archlinux community (maybe only me)
pestered them enough for them to decide to make official
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 2:30 AM, Magnus Therning wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 08:15, Stephen Weinberg
> wrote:
> > My package, godesk (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37635), is
> > no longer needed. Apparently the archlinux community (maybe only me)
> > pestered them enough for them
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 08:15, Stephen Weinberg wrote:
> My package, godesk (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37635), is
> no longer needed. Apparently the archlinux community (maybe only me)
> pestered them enough for them to decide to make official packages!
> (http://www.odesk.com/commu
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 2:28 AM, Magnus Therning wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 07:27, Nathan O wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Magnus Therning >wrote:
> >> On 27/08/10 06:03, Nathan O wrote:
> >>> I have encountered having the issues with software that uses cmake as
> >>> it's bui
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 07:27, Nathan O wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Magnus Therning wrote:
>> On 27/08/10 06:03, Nathan O wrote:
>>> I have encountered having the issues with software that uses cmake as
>>> it's build system. Usually I get the warnings stating that there is an
>>> In
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 2:19 AM, Nathan O wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 1:27 AM, Nathan O wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Magnus Therning wrote:
>>
>>> On 27/08/10 06:03, Nathan O wrote:
>>> > I have encountered having the issues with software that uses cmake as
>>> it'
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 1:27 AM, Nathan O wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Magnus Therning wrote:
>
>> On 27/08/10 06:03, Nathan O wrote:
>> > I have encountered having the issues with software that uses cmake as
>> it's
>> > build system. Usually I get the warnings stating that ther
My package, godesk (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37635), is
no longer needed. Apparently the archlinux community (maybe only me)
pestered them enough for them to decide to make official packages!
(http://www.odesk.com/community/node/234) This new edition was
apparently created at the ex
57 matches
Mail list logo
