On 1 September 2010 20:47, Thorsten Töpper wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 19:09:38 +0100
> Peter Lewis wrote:
>> On Wednesday 01 September 2010 at 08:38 Xyne wrote:
>> > You have misunderstood my proposal. The phrase "active throughout
>> > both the discussion period and the voting period" is not th
>
>
> I believe those emails are meant to be interpreted as
> usern...@aur.archlinux.org, but they're probably obfuscated for
> psuedo-security reasons.
I forgot to write that I already tried usern...@aur.archlinux.org and
username@archlinux.org but both without success.
> Anyway, I'm not the
2010/9/2 Lukáš Jirkovský
> On 2 September 2010 00:42, Nathan O wrote:
> > Currently I have adopted Aptana and updated it to a nicer PKGBUILD.
> > Namcap gives me that ELF files are outside of a valid path.
> > The way Aptana is packaged, it seems you would need to copy the source
> > directory t
On 2 September 2010 06:04, Nathan O wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 9:59 PM, Loui Chang wrote:
>
>> been flirted with.
>>
>> Here's a relevant feature request.
>> http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/7132
>>
>>
> I took a look at the feature request, and I have to say that I kinda like
> the idea that
On 2 September 2010 00:42, Nathan O wrote:
> Currently I have adopted Aptana and updated it to a nicer PKGBUILD.
> Namcap gives me that ELF files are outside of a valid path.
> The way Aptana is packaged, it seems you would need to copy the source
> directory to another directory on the system, fo
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 9:59 PM, Loui Chang wrote:
> On Thu 02 Sep 2010 03:48 +0200, Stefan Husmann wrote:
> > Am 01.09.2010 20:08, schrieb PyroPeter:
> > > Hello subscribers,
> > >
> > > imo its hard to decide which category to use for some packages.
> > >
> > > E.g. a browser: Should it be categ
2010/9/1 José Valecillos :
> Can you please delete gwibber-microft-bzr, gwibber-sqlite-backend-bzr,
> gwibber-sweston-bzr, gwibber-trunk-bzr and gwibber2.0 ?
>
> All that packages has been orphan by his maintainers or, in the case of
> gwibber-sweston-bzr, are no maintained anymore. These packages
Can you please delete gwibber-microft-bzr, gwibber-sqlite-backend-bzr,
gwibber-sweston-bzr, gwibber-trunk-bzr and gwibber2.0 ?
All that packages has been orphan by his maintainers or, in the case of
gwibber-sweston-bzr, are no maintained anymore. These packages are just
older and custom versi
On Thu 02 Sep 2010 03:48 +0200, Stefan Husmann wrote:
> Am 01.09.2010 20:08, schrieb PyroPeter:
> > Hello subscribers,
> >
> > imo its hard to decide which category to use for some packages.
> >
> > E.g. a browser: Should it be categorized as "network" or "x11"?
> >
> > Is there a exact definiti
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 8:48 PM, Stefan Husmann
wrote:
> Am 01.09.2010 20:08, schrieb PyroPeter:
> > Hello subscribers,
> >
> > imo its hard to decide which category to use for some packages.
> >
> > E.g. a browser: Should it be categorized as "network" or "x11"?
> >
> > Is there a exact definition
Am 01.09.2010 20:08, schrieb PyroPeter:
> Hello subscribers,
>
> imo its hard to decide which category to use for some packages.
>
> E.g. a browser: Should it be categorized as "network" or "x11"?
>
> Is there a exact definition of these categorys somewhere?
> If not, one should be written.
>
>
Am 02.09.2010 01:14, schrieb Ivan S. Freitas:
>> qucs
>
> Just adopted it on aur.
>
> And about man-pages-pt_br, whats is going to be done? Even not being
> the most recent or even the most complete, it's still useful for
> non-english speakers.
>
man-pages-pt_br has been updated in [community
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:57 PM, jwbirdsong <
jwbirds...@jwbirdsong.homelinux.com> wrote:
> On 09/01/2010 05:14 PM, Nathan O wrote:
> > Can tweetr http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27503 be deleted.
> The
> > homepage of Tweet-r only lists the application for the IPhone and the
> > download
Can somebody delete these packages:
twibble http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28357 (Discontinued, and
haven't been able to find a new download location)
On Aug 26, 2010, at 9:43 AM, Philipp Überbacher wrote:
> I don't think anything uses nama as a module, so I rather stick with the
> current name.
Okay it's no biggie. The 'provides' [bash] array in the PKGBUILD just gives
aliases for package names. That way packages can essentially have more tha
On 09/01/2010 05:14 PM, Nathan O wrote:
> Can tweetr http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27503 be deleted. The
> homepage of Tweet-r only lists the application for the IPhone and the
> download location no longer exists and some of the sites I tried to find an
> alternate download location, po
On 09/01/2010 03:42 PM, Nathan O wrote:
> Currently I have adopted Aptana and updated it to a nicer PKGBUILD.
> Namcap gives me that ELF files are outside of a valid path.
> The way Aptana is packaged, it seems you would need to copy the source
> directory to another directory on the system, for e
On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 18:07 -0500, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
> > I think we should drop emerald-themes, I haven't followed compiz dev,
> > but emerald-themes hasn't been updated since 2007 (or any new code in
> > git since then)
> >
>
> Anothe
Can tweetr http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27503 be deleted. The
homepage of Tweet-r only lists the application for the IPhone and the
download location no longer exists and some of the sites I tried to find an
alternate download location, points to the dead-download location or
homepage
> qucs
Just adopted it on aur.
And about man-pages-pt_br, whats is going to be done? Even not being
the most recent or even the most complete, it's still useful for
non-english speakers.
--
==
Ivan Sichmann Freitas
Engenharia de Computação 2009
UNICA
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 4:31 AM, bardo wrote:
>>> 2010/8/30 Thomas Dziedzic :
mt-daapd x86_64 Community orphan
>>>
>>> This one works, and as far as I hav
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 4:31 AM, bardo wrote:
>> 2010/8/30 Thomas Dziedzic :
>>> mt-daapd x86_64 Community orphan
>>
>> This one works, and as far as I have seen it won't get any more
>> releases, but it also will work
Currently I have adopted Aptana and updated it to a nicer PKGBUILD.
Namcap gives me that ELF files are outside of a valid path.
The way Aptana is packaged, it seems you would need to copy the source
directory to another directory on the system, for example /opt/${pkgname}.
Since you can't compile t
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 4:31 AM, bardo wrote:
> 2010/8/30 Thomas Dziedzic :
>> mt-daapd x86_64 Community orphan
>
> This one works, and as far as I have seen it won't get any more
> releases, but it also will work indefinitely. The stable branch is
> long time dead, and svn s
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 12:36 PM, PyroPeter wrote:
> On 09/01/2010 06:35 PM, PyroPeter wrote:
>
>> On 09/01/2010 03:02 AM, Nathan O wrote:
>>
>>> Ok the current packages that gives me the problems, are:
>>>
>>> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11337
>>> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.ph
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 17:32 -0500, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
> With a result of 16 votes for yes, 0 votes for no, and 4 votes for abstain.
> I would like to welcome Lukas Jirkovsky (stativ) as our newest trusted user!
>
> Everybody give him a warm welcome! :)
>
Congratulations, Lukas!
Gordonjcp MM
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 12:32 AM, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
> With a result of 16 votes for yes, 0 votes for no, and 4 votes for abstain.
> I would like to welcome Lukas Jirkovsky (stativ) as our newest trusted user!
>
> Everybody give him a warm welcome! :)
>
Welcome!
On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 19:09:38 +0100
Peter Lewis wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 September 2010 at 08:38 Xyne wrote:
> > You have misunderstood my proposal. The phrase "active throughout
> > both the discussion period and the voting period" is not the same
> > as "active".
>
> On Wednesday 01 September 201
2010/9/1 Lukáš Jirkovský :
> I need a small hint.
>
> "Send Aaron all the information based on this template to have access
> on dev interface"
> I guess Aaron Schaefer is meant (this should be made more clear). I
> see he has email set to aschaefer.aur.archlinux.org at
> http://www.archlinux.org/t
On Wednesday 01 September 2010 at 08:38 Xyne wrote:
> You have misunderstood my proposal. The phrase "active throughout both the
> discussion period and the voting period" is not the same as "active".
On Wednesday 01 September 2010 at 18:37 Eric Bélanger wrote:
> If your intention is to allow new
Hello subscribers,
imo its hard to decide which category to use for some packages.
E.g. a browser: Should it be categorized as "network" or "x11"?
Is there a exact definition of these categorys somewhere?
If not, one should be written.
Regards, PyroPeter
--
freenode/pyropeter
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 3:38 AM, Xyne wrote:
> Eric Bélanger wrote:
>
>> FYI: it's already in the by-laws:
>>
>> "Following the discussion period, a voting period opens. Simple YES,
>> NO , or ABSTAIN votes are to be cast under the Trusted User section
>> of the AUR homepage by at least a quorum o
On 09/01/2010 06:35 PM, PyroPeter wrote:
On 09/01/2010 03:02 AM, Nathan O wrote:
Ok the current packages that gives me the problems, are:
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11337
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10611
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14896 (contacted autho
Am 01.09.2010 14:06, schrieb Ng Oon-Ee:
> On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 13:22 +0200, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
>> On 1 September 2010 10:43, Thorsten Töpper wrote:
>>> Do you prefer tea or coffee?
>>>
>>
>> Certainly coffee.
>
> Wrong answer. Its tacos!
>
>
A warm welcom from another coffee drinker. Ng O
On 09/01/2010 03:02 AM, Nathan O wrote:
Ok the current packages that gives me the problems, are:
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11337
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10611
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14896 (contacted author)
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?I
2010/9/1 Christopher Brannon :
> Lukáš Jirkovský writes:
>
>> I need a small hint.
>>
>> "Send Aaron all the information based on this template to have access
>> on dev interface"
>> I guess Aaron Schaefer is meant (this should be made more clear).
>
> You need to contact Aaron Griffin, rather tha
Lukáš Jirkovský writes:
> I need a small hint.
>
> "Send Aaron all the information based on this template to have access
> on dev interface"
> I guess Aaron Schaefer is meant (this should be made more clear).
You need to contact Aaron Griffin, rather than Aaron Schaefer.
-- Chris
pgpdAnPaScmf
Am Wed, 1 Sep 2010 01:52:00 -0500
schrieb Nathan O :
> I usually do include the names, though this time I didn't because I
> was making a list of packages that seemed to be the same.
It would also in this case be nice if you would give the package names.
It saves the package maintainers to check
I need a small hint.
"Send Aaron all the information based on this template to have access
on dev interface"
I guess Aaron Schaefer is meant (this should be made more clear). I
see he has email set to aschaefer.aur.archlinux.org at
http://www.archlinux.org/trustedusers/. Unfortunately I didn't yet
On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 13:22 +0200, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
> On 1 September 2010 10:43, Thorsten Töpper wrote:
> > Do you prefer tea or coffee?
> >
>
> Certainly coffee.
Wrong answer. Its tacos!
On 1 September 2010 00:32, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
> With a result of 16 votes for yes, 0 votes for no, and 4 votes for abstain.
> I would like to welcome Lukas Jirkovsky (stativ) as our newest trusted user!
>
> Everybody give him a warm welcome! :)
>
Thank you!
I hope I'll be a good and wise tru
Hi,
There are currently two packages for the KDE quickaccess plasmoid in the AUR.
This one is for KDE 4.2 and gives a 404 error:
kdemod-kdeplasma-quickaccess
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19191
...and can therefore be deleted IMO. The maintainer hasn't responded to a
comment saying
Hi,
My internet connection broke down last Saturday during some thunderstorm and
has refuced to come up again ever since. Still waiting for it to be fixed,
but I have no idea how long it will take.
Please feel free to fix my packages if necessary.
Regards,
Ronald
On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 17:32:38 -0500
Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
> With a result of 16 votes for yes, 0 votes for no, and 4 votes for
> abstain. I would like to welcome Lukas Jirkovsky (stativ) as our
> newest trusted user!
Congratulations Lukas :-)
> Everybody give him a warm welcome! :)
Do you prefer
Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
> With a result of 16 votes for yes, 0 votes for no, and 4 votes for abstain.
> I would like to welcome Lukas Jirkovsky (stativ) as our newest trusted user!
>
> Everybody give him a warm welcome! :)
Welcome to the team, Lukas!
Eric Bélanger wrote:
> FYI: it's already in the by-laws:
>
> "Following the discussion period, a voting period opens. Simple YES,
> NO , or ABSTAIN votes are to be cast under the Trusted User section
> of the AUR homepage by at least a quorum of active TUs. "
>
> and
>
> "A TU may declare them
46 matches
Mail list logo
