On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 12:55 AM, doorknob60 doorkno...@gmail.com wrote:
wow, that was quick, thanks :) and OK ill post a link next time
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 10:46 PM, Thomas Dziedzic gos...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 12:36 AM, doorknob60 doorkno...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 11:11 PM, Nathan O ndowens@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 12:55 AM, doorknob60 doorkno...@gmail.com wrote:
wow, that was quick, thanks :) and OK ill post a link next time
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 10:46 PM, Thomas Dziedzic gos...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Could an AUR admin (or Andrea) reset the perms of the
community-staging repo db for both arches?
Thanks
On 12 September 2010 00:39, Philipp Überbacher hollun...@lavabit.com wrote:
Excerpts from Det's message of 2010-09-11 19:36:05 +0200:
On 9/10/10, Lukáš Jirkovský l.jirkov...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10 September 2010 13:09, Evangelos Foutras foutre...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry, I'm having a hard
On 9/12/10, Lukáš Jirkovský l.jirkov...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 September 2010 00:39, Philipp Überbacher hollun...@lavabit.com
wrote:
I know little about it, but if I'm not wrong, songbird for linux isn't
developed anymore? So what does it matter?
Actually it is, but only in the SVN from which
Hi. :)
Please remove tint [1] package from AUR because it's not up-to-date and
same package is in Community repo [2]
[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17082
[2] http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/tint2/
--
elwin013
jabber: elwin...@jabbim.pl
mail: kont...@elwin013.com
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 4:00 PM, elwin013 kont...@elwin013.com wrote:
Hi. :)
Please remove tint [1] package from AUR because it's not up-to-date and same
package is in Community repo [2]
[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17082
[2]
On 09/09/2010 10:22 PM, Christopher Brannon wrote:
Peter Lewisp...@muddygoat.org writes:
Hi folks,
After the recent discussions about the number of TUs, the size of [community]
etc., I have decided to apply to be a Trusted User myself. Chris Brannon has
kindly agreed to sponsor me.
Indeed
On 09/12/2010 07:03 AM, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 4:00 PM, elwin013 kont...@elwin013.com wrote:
Hi. :)
Please remove tint [1] package from AUR because it's not up-to-date and same
package is in Community repo [2]
[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17082
[2]
Hi everybody,
Could you delete those packages as they are orphans, out-of-date and not
updated for over a year ?
- exo-alt: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17194
- exo-devel: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20765
- exo-eject: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27439
-
Ionuț Bîru ib...@archlinux.org writes:
indeed i like his application a lot. waiting for the voting period
I'm waiting, myself. We still have two days of discussion period
remaining. Usually, there's a flurry of discussion after the
application, and then things are quiet for a few days.
--
On 12.09.2010 15:15, jwbirdsong wrote:
IMHO tint should have stayed. TINT was as up to date as it got, any
release after that was tint2 (which is what is in repo).
From convo on IRC there are/(were) ppl that still prefered to use tint
over tint2.
No idea why, but they did.
Just sayin'
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 4:30 PM, elwin013 kont...@elwin013.com wrote:
On 12.09.2010 15:15, jwbirdsong wrote:
IMHO tint should have stayed. TINT was as up to date as it got, any
release after that was tint2 (which is what is in repo).
From convo on IRC there are/(were) ppl that still
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 10:05:18AM +0200, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
On 12 September 2010 00:39, Philipp Überbacher hollun...@lavabit.com wrote:
It seems you're right. It should be replaced by Nightingale
(http://getnightingale.com/), Songbird's fork.
There was a discussion about this not too
Hi,
this message is for the newly members in our team.
Please send me your details to give you account on our arch interface to
manage your package.
From know own i'm in charge of this.
--
Ionuț
On 09/12/2010 07:17 AM, Xavier D. wrote:
Hi everybody,
Could you delete those packages as they are orphans, out-of-date and not
updated for over a year ?
- exo-alt: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17194
- exo-devel: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20765
- exo-eject:
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 10:05:35AM -0600, jwbirdsong wrote:
On 09/12/2010 07:17 AM, Xavier D. wrote:
1st-ly I'd like to apologize to the OP, the following comments are NOT
directed just at you but more as an open mail to community.
There seems to be a recent trend to request deletion of
On Sun, 2010-09-12 at 11:01 -0500, Brad Fanella wrote:
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 10:05:35AM -0600, jwbirdsong wrote:
On 09/12/2010 07:17 AM, Xavier D. wrote:
1st-ly I'd like to apologize to the OP, the following comments are NOT
directed just at you but more as an open mail to community.
Hello,
The following package
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14710
for pastebinit is no longer maintained. I sent an email to the PKGBUILD
author, he didn't reply me; so I guess he is MIA.
I can maintain this package. (my username: Spip)
Cheers,
--
François Boulogne.
On Sunday 12 September 2010 18:31:00 François Boulogne wrote:
Hello,
The following package
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14710
for pastebinit is no longer maintained. I sent an email to the PKGBUILD
author, he didn't reply me; so I guess he is MIA.
I can maintain this
On Sunday 12 September 2010 18:31:00 François Boulogne wrote:
Hello,
The following package
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14710
for pastebinit is no longer maintained. I sent an email to the PKGBUILD
author, he didn't reply me; so I guess he is MIA.
I can maintain this
* François Boulogne boulogn...@gmail.com [2010-09-12 18:31]:
The following package
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14710
for pastebinit is no longer maintained. I sent an email to the PKGBUILD
author, he didn't reply me; so I guess he is MIA.
Just for interest: What is MIA?
On 09/12/2010 10:08 AM, Bernhard Walle wrote:
* François Boulogne boulogn...@gmail.com [2010-09-12 18:31]:
The following package
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14710
for pastebinit is no longer maintained. I sent an email to the PKGBUILD
author, he didn't reply me; so I guess he is
On 09/12/2010 11:06 AM, Jakob Gruber wrote:
On Sunday 12 September 2010 18:31:00 François Boulogne wrote:
Hello,
The following package
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14710
for pastebinit is no longer maintained. I sent an email to the PKGBUILD
author, he didn't reply me; so I
On Sunday 12 September 2010 19:23:58 jwbirdsong wrote:
On 09/12/2010 11:06 AM, Jakob Gruber wrote:
On Sunday 12 September 2010 18:31:00 François Boulogne wrote:
Hello,
The following package
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14710
for pastebinit is no longer maintained. I sent
On 09/12/2010 11:28 AM, Jakob Gruber wrote:
This looks a bit more recent:
Seems my 'google foo' is abit off today. Taken also.
On Sunday 12 September 2010 at 18:06 Jakob Gruber wrote:
Last activity by this maintainer was in July 2009, and some of his packages
are outdated / broken so I'm guessing he's disappeared.
The following packages have been disowned:
ascii http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22593
Grr...svn makes me mad.
svn-packages/. % svn commit
brad at Xenon on svn svn-packages:26045
Log message unchanged or not specified
(a)bort, (c)ontinue, (e)dit:
c
Adding binutils-avr
Adding binutils-avr/trunk
Adding
On 09/12/2010 09:58 PM, Brad Fanella wrote:
Grr...svn makes me mad.
svn-packages/. % svn commit
brad at Xenon on svn svn-packages:26045
Log message unchanged or not specified
(a)bort, (c)ontinue, (e)dit:
c
Adding binutils-avr
Adding
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 10:20:17PM +0300, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
On 09/12/2010 09:58 PM, Brad Fanella wrote:
Grr...svn makes me mad.
svn-packages/. % svn commit
brad at Xenon on svn svn-packages:26045
Log message unchanged or not specified
On 09/12/2010 10:23 PM, Brad Fanella wrote:
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 10:20:17PM +0300, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
On 09/12/2010 09:58 PM, Brad Fanella wrote:
Grr...svn makes me mad.
svn-packages/. % svn commit
brad at Xenon on svn svn-packages:26045
Am 08.09.2010 22:30, schrieb Brad Fanella:
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 10:12:48PM +0200, Stefan Husmann wrote:
Hello,
I would like to move mupdf to [community] and drop maintenance of apvlv
instead. Are there objections against the first issue, and does
somebody want to take apvlv?
Regards
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 11:26:35PM +0200, Stefan Husmann wrote:
Am 08.09.2010 22:30, schrieb Brad Fanella:
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 10:12:48PM +0200, Stefan Husmann wrote:
Hello,
I would like to move mupdf to [community] and drop maintenance of apvlv
instead. Are there objections
33 matches
Mail list logo
