Re: [aur-general] Delete chromium-nogconf

2010-09-17 Thread Brad Fanella
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 09:27:26AM +0300, Det wrote: > Helllooo, > > Please delete chromium-nogconf: > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35972 - the previous maintainer > recommends to "install no-gconf and chromium from extra instead". Done, thanks.

[aur-general] Delete chromium-nogconf

2010-09-17 Thread Det
Helllooo, Please delete chromium-nogconf: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35972 - the previous maintainer recommends to "install no-gconf and chromium from extra instead".

Re: [aur-general] AUR/[extra]/[community] duplicates

2010-09-17 Thread member kittykatt
Just ran it and looks like the following packages are both in one of the official repositories and also in the AUR... - qrencode That package is 3.1.1-1 in the AUR and 3.1.1-2 in community, so I consider it a duplicate. Remove? On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:28 PM, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > On Th

[aur-general] avbin

2010-09-17 Thread Nathan O
I started to adopt avbin64 and noticed that in the repo, there is avbin32, avbin-source and avbin, you can see the results http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?O=0&K=avbin&do_Search=Go In reality, I believe there should really only be one avbin since you can use if statements for it to download th

Re: [aur-general] Move network-ups-tools to AUR

2010-09-17 Thread Jan Steffens
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Thorsten Töpper wrote: > Hello, > > network-ups-tools is long orphaned and since the version bump I did in > spring we have an open ticket[1] not one of us could fix. I asked Roman > who once maintained it, but he said he could not "provide any useful > opinion her

Re: [aur-general] Move psyco from [community] to [unsupported]?

2010-09-17 Thread Thorsten Töpper
On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:59:51 +0300 Evangelos Foutras wrote: > On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Christopher Brannon > wrote: > > * It won't build with Python 2.7. > > * It only supports i686. > > * Nothing depends on it. > > * Apparently, pypy is now preferred. > > > > Any objections? > > > > -- C

Re: [aur-general] Packages deletion request

2010-09-17 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 8:38 PM, KESHAV P.R. wrote: > And this package also lib32-konqueror-nsplugins > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10287 Gone, thanks. (Please don't top-post.)

[aur-general] Move network-ups-tools to AUR

2010-09-17 Thread Thorsten Töpper
Hello, network-ups-tools is long orphaned and since the version bump I did in spring we have an open ticket[1] not one of us could fix. I asked Roman who once maintained it, but he said he could not "provide any useful opinion here". So from my point of view, we can't do something about it, no on

Re: [aur-general] Packages deletion request

2010-09-17 Thread KESHAV P.R.
And this package also lib32-konqueror-nsplugins http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10287 2010/9/17 Lukáš Jirkovský : > On 17 September 2010 17:53, KESHAV P.R. wrote: >> The following packages have to be removed from AUR >> >> nspluginwrapper-flash     - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php

Re: [aur-general] Packages deletion request

2010-09-17 Thread Lukáš Jirkovský
On 17 September 2010 17:53, KESHAV P.R. wrote: > The following packages have to be removed from AUR > > nspluginwrapper-flash     - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6232 Deleted. Checked it with the flash from [multilib] and they are indeed duplicates (only the multilib version is a bit b

Re: [aur-general] Packages deletion request

2010-09-17 Thread Ionuț Bîru
On 09/17/2010 06:53 PM, KESHAV P.R. wrote: The following packages have to be removed from AUR nspluginwrapper-flash - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6232 nspluginwrapper-ubuntu - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14707 wine-stable- http://aur.archlinux.o

[aur-general] Packages deletion request

2010-09-17 Thread KESHAV P.R.
The following packages have to be removed from AUR nspluginwrapper-flash - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6232 nspluginwrapper-ubuntu - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14707 wine-stable- http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35486 nspluginwrapper and

Re: [aur-general] Move psyco from [community] to [unsupported]?

2010-09-17 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Christopher Brannon wrote: > * It won't build with Python 2.7. > * It only supports i686. > * Nothing depends on it. > * Apparently, pypy is now preferred. > > Any objections? > > -- Chris No objection, let's move it. :)

[aur-general] Move psyco from [community] to [unsupported]?

2010-09-17 Thread Christopher Brannon
* It won't build with Python 2.7. * It only supports i686. * Nothing depends on it. * Apparently, pypy is now preferred. Any objections? -- Chris pgpt1VXRKlDTH.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [aur-general] Flashplugin packages removal

2010-09-17 Thread Thorsten Töpper
On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 13:21:44 +0530 "KESHAV P.R." wrote: > >> flashplugin-native64 - > >> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38184 > > The old stable 64bit release, will be removed when we have it back > > in the repo. > > There has never been any stable release of x86_64 flashpl

Re: [aur-general] Removal request (bin32-skype)

2010-09-17 Thread Malte Rabenseifner
On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 10:45:17 +0200, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > I guess this [1] can be removed as well as skype has been in [multilib] > for a while now... > > [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7914 It was time indeed. I announced the multilib version in the post-install message long ag

Re: [aur-general] Removal request (bin32-skype)

2010-09-17 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > I guess this [1] can be removed as well as skype has been in [multilib] > for a while now... > > [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7914 Done.

[aur-general] Removal request (bin32-skype)

2010-09-17 Thread Lukas Fleischer
I guess this [1] can be removed as well as skype has been in [multilib] for a while now... [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7914

Re: [aur-general] Flashplugin packages removal

2010-09-17 Thread KESHAV P.R.
>> flashplugin-native64 - >> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38184 > The old stable 64bit release, will be removed when we have it back in > the repo. There has never been any stable release of x86_64 flashplugin, the old plugin (with the security problems) was part of Adobe L