[aur-general] delete incorrectly named package

2010-10-05 Thread Andreas Wagner
I came across a disowned package( http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23013 ). The former contributor just put "svn" in the pkver field. It should be named n2n-svn. I adopted it however there is no non-vcs source release so I can't convert into a stable package. I set the new package ( http://

Re: [aur-general] Orphaning request

2010-10-05 Thread José Valecillos
On 10/05/2010 01:19 PM, Stefan Husmann wrote: Am 05.10.2010 17:40, schrieb Adam Hani Schakaki: On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 14:48:10 -0500 Thomas Dziedzic wrote: On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Adam Hani Schakaki wrote: On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 14:28:16 -0500 Thomas Dziedzic wrote: On Sat, Sep 25, 2

Re: [aur-general] Proposal: Mass AUR Cleanup

2010-10-05 Thread David Campbell
Excerpts from Jos\xe9 Valecillos's message of 2010-10-05 20:37:04 -0400: > On 10/03/2010 01:24 PM, Jakob Gruber wrote: > > Hi TUs, > > > > I've just created a new proposal concerning the orphaning of all packages > > marked 'out of date' which have not been updated (or submitted) since > > befo

Re: [aur-general] Proposal: Mass AUR Cleanup

2010-10-05 Thread José Valecillos
On 10/03/2010 01:24 PM, Jakob Gruber wrote: Hi TUs, I've just created a new proposal concerning the orphaning of all packages marked 'out of date' which have not been updated (or submitted) since before January 1st, 2009. For details, see the actual proposal text. The voting period ends on

Re: [aur-general] Fixing stuff in [community] repos

2010-10-05 Thread Eric Bélanger
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 7:52 AM, Allan McRae wrote: > Hi, > > While moving the python rebuilds I noticed the following packages have > issues: >  - cgmail Fixed. >  - gammu >  - mathomatic > > The all have commits in community-staging and some of them had entires in > the db but not a package in

Re: [aur-general] GUI

2010-10-05 Thread Heiko Baums
Am Tue, 5 Oct 2010 15:52:27 -0500 schrieb "Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227)" : > http://ompldr.org/vNXFoNg > > On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Dieter Plaetinck > wrote: > > > On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 19:34:53 +0200 > > Xyne wrote: > > > > > > > Unless, of course, you plan to include an animated papercl

Re: [aur-general] GUI

2010-10-05 Thread Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227)
http://ompldr.org/vNXFoNg On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Dieter Plaetinck wrote: > On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 19:34:53 +0200 > Xyne wrote: > > > > Unless, of course, you plan to include an animated paperclip that asks > > questions such as "I see that you have GTK installed. Would you like > > to enabl

Re: [aur-general] GUI

2010-10-05 Thread Dieter Plaetinck
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 19:34:53 +0200 Xyne wrote: > Unless, of course, you plan to include an animated paperclip that asks > questions such as "I see that you have GTK installed. Would you like > to enable a graphical user interface?" and "I see that your master > boot record contains valid data. Wo

Re: [aur-general] Orphaning request

2010-10-05 Thread Stefan Husmann
Am 05.10.2010 17:40, schrieb Adam Hani Schakaki: > On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 14:48:10 -0500 > Thomas Dziedzic wrote: > >> On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Adam Hani Schakaki wrote: >>> On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 14:28:16 -0500 >>> Thomas Dziedzic wrote: >>> On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Adam Hani Sc

Re: [aur-general] GUI

2010-10-05 Thread Xyne
Magnus Therning wrote: > I think you should also make sure that gtk then becomes a dependency of the > resulting package to prevent accidental removal of gtk. Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 10:00 +0200, Heiko Baums wrote: > > Build two packages or a split package as soon as AUR has su

Re: [aur-general] Orphaning request

2010-10-05 Thread Adam Hani Schakaki
On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 14:48:10 -0500 Thomas Dziedzic wrote: > On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Adam Hani Schakaki wrote: > > On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 14:28:16 -0500 > > Thomas Dziedzic wrote: > > > >> On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Adam Hani Schakaki wrote: > >> > Hello, > >> > please orphan go-ope

Re: [aur-general] [community] PKGBUILDs incompatible with sourcing

2010-10-05 Thread Ray Rashif
On 5 October 2010 12:22, Sergej Pupykin wrote: >  On 05.10.2010 01:04, Ray Rashif wrote: >> >> I'm not filing (a) bug(s) for these since there's no harm done, but >> this should serve as a reminder to everyone that we should check our >> buildscripts for sourcing compatibility whenever possible, f

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: nvidia-beta-ice-rt

2010-10-05 Thread Ng Oon-Ee
On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 12:16 +0300, Evangelos Foutras wrote: > 2010/10/5 Ng Oon-Ee : > > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30371 > > > > nvidia-beta-ice-rt > > > > My package, initially created it for the RT-variant of kernel26-ice. > > Forgot all about it because I subsequently created and s

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: nvidia-beta-ice-rt

2010-10-05 Thread Evangelos Foutras
2010/10/5 Ng Oon-Ee : > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30371 > > nvidia-beta-ice-rt > > My package, initially created it for the RT-variant of kernel26-ice. > Forgot all about it because I subsequently created and still use > nvidia-beta-all. Doubt anyone is using this package, since as i

[aur-general] Delete request: nvidia-beta-ice-rt

2010-10-05 Thread Ng Oon-Ee
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30371 nvidia-beta-ice-rt My package, initially created it for the RT-variant of kernel26-ice. Forgot all about it because I subsequently created and still use nvidia-beta-all. Doubt anyone is using this package, since as it is it would not work at all (ver

Re: [aur-general] GUI

2010-10-05 Thread Ng Oon-Ee
On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 10:00 +0200, Heiko Baums wrote: > Am Tue, 5 Oct 2010 01:12:06 -0500 > schrieb Nathan O : > > > Probably not allowed to do so, but I figured I would ask. In a > > PKGBUILD can we do something like: > > > > echo "Do you want to enable GTK support?" > > read gtk > > > > if [[

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: gnome-python-desktop subpackages

2010-10-05 Thread Ionuț Bîru
On 10/05/2010 05:01 AM, SpepS wrote: Recently gnome-python-desktop splitted into subpackages, so python-metacity (mine) python-rsvg (mine) python-wnck python-gnomekeyring in AUR, are no needed anymore. Please delete. C ya done -- Ionuț

Re: [aur-general] GUI

2010-10-05 Thread Heiko Baums
Am Tue, 5 Oct 2010 01:12:06 -0500 schrieb Nathan O : > Probably not allowed to do so, but I figured I would ask. In a > PKGBUILD can we do something like: > > echo "Do you want to enable GTK support?" > read gtk > > if [[ "gtk" == "yes" ]]; then > ./configure --with-gtk > > and so on. > >

Re: [aur-general] GUI

2010-10-05 Thread Dieter Plaetinck
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 01:33:17 -0500 Nathan O wrote: > Could there be a possibility of having something similar to USE flags > for AUR? We have something similar: copy the pkgbuild, change configure option. done. I also don't like the proposed interactiveness and checking the environment. Dieter

Re: [aur-general] GUI

2010-10-05 Thread Nathan O
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 2:01 AM, Magnus Therning wrote: > On 05/10/10 07:50, Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227) wrote: > > don't think i'd even do that, but just to nitpick, it'd be better written > > as: > > > > [[ -f /usr/bin/gtk-config ]] && COPTS="--with-gtk" > > > > then add $COPTS to your compil

Re: [aur-general] GUI

2010-10-05 Thread Magnus Therning
On 05/10/10 07:50, Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227) wrote: > don't think i'd even do that, but just to nitpick, it'd be better written > as: > > [[ -f /usr/bin/gtk-config ]] && COPTS="--with-gtk" > > then add $COPTS to your compile line. I think you should also make sure that gtk then becomes a depe