On 2010/10/19 Ray Rashif wrote:
> 2010/10/19 Clément Démoulins :
>> Hi,
>> Since the default python interpreter is python 3, should we renamed
>> python 2 librairies: python2-* and python 3 libraries: python-* ?
>
> The consensus is that if these libraries do not work with python 3,
> they do not
hi.
hachoir-0.5.2 package from 2006 is still in AUR while it has been
superseeded by the hachoir-* package family (hachoir-core,
hachoir-metadata, hachoir-parser, hachoir-regex, hachoir-subfile)
and this does not even build, I think
please delete hachoir-0.5.2-1
On Tuesday 19 October 2010 at 22:51 Ray Rashif wrote:
> > There's currently a very out of date openjdk development version package
> > here:
> >
> > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14671
> >
> > It's also currently orphaned and doesn't build any more. However, there's
> > quite a lot of
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 12:35 PM, solsTiCe d'Hiver
wrote:
> hi.
> hachoir-0.5.2 package from 2006 is still in AUR while it has been
> superseeded by the hachoir-* package family (hachoir-core,
> hachoir-metadata, hachoir-parser, hachoir-regex, hachoir-subfile)
>
> and this does not even build, I t
Am Thu, 14 Oct 2010 14:19:26 +0300
schrieb Ionuț Bîru :
> somebody already uploaded a new build, libreoffice-new. the name is
> kinda stupid and it makes me want to delete it.
I'd second this. It also seems to be a duplicate to libreoffice-bin.
And libreoffice-build should be deleted, too, renam
On 20/10/10 23:47, Heiko Baums wrote:
So I'd like to see LibreOffice in [extra] besides OpenOffice. I think
LibreOffice is or will soon be too important to just have it in AUR or
[community].
Wow... that was fast:
> pacman -Si libreoffice
Repository : extra
Name : libreoffice
Ve
Am Wed, 20 Oct 2010 23:50:53 +1000
schrieb Allan McRae :
> On 20/10/10 23:47, Heiko Baums wrote:
> > So I'd like to see LibreOffice in [extra] besides OpenOffice. I
> > think LibreOffice is or will soon be too important to just have it
> > in AUR or [community].
>
> Wow... that was fast:
>
> >
On 13:49 Wed 20 Oct , Allan McRae wrote:
> On 20/10/10 23:47, Heiko Baums wrote:
> >So I'd like to see LibreOffice in [extra] besides OpenOffice. I think
> >LibreOffice is or will soon be too important to just have it in AUR or
> >[community].
>
> Wow... that was fast:
>
> > pacman -Si libre
Am Wed, 20 Oct 2010 14:16:23 + (UTC)
schrieb karl :
> The version in extra is the libreoffice alpha. That version isn't
> compatible to the libreoffice language packs. In the AUR is
> libreoffice-bin, it's the libreoffice beta and compatible to the also
> provided language packs of libre offic
There's currently xmacro [1] and xmacro-patched [2] in the AUR. Both do
the same thing, and even generate identical binaries. xmacro-patched
should therefore be deleted.
[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15191
[2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27245
2010/10/20 Ng Oon-Ee :
> There's currently xmacro [1] and xmacro-patched [2] in the AUR. Both do
> the same thing, and even generate identical binaries. xmacro-patched
> should therefore be deleted.
>
> [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15191
> [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?I
Hello There,
django-command-extensions projects is renamed to django-extensions in
upstream and moved to github. I adopted both packages today. Can you please
delete django-command-extensions package? I'll continue maintaining
django-extensions.
Thanks!
---
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 11:46 PM, Alper KANAT wrote:
> Hello There,
>
> django-command-extensions projects is renamed to django-extensions in
> upstream and moved to github. I adopted both packages today. Can you please
> delete django-command-extensions package? I'll continue maintaining
> django
Thanks!
---
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
2010/10/20 Evangelos Foutras
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 11:46 PM, Alper KANAT wrote:
> > Hello There,
> >
> > django-command-extensions projects is renamed to django-extensions in
> > upstream and moved to github. I adopted both packages today. Can yo
On 10/17/2010 04:02 AM, Loui Chang wrote:
On Sun 10 Oct 2010 21:27 +0200, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
Hi!
My name is Lukas Fleischer, I'm a 20-year-old student from Germany,
studying Computer Science at the University of Stuttgart, freelance
web-developper, IT consultant and hobbyist DJ.
I've been
Please orphan dos2unix[1]. It is outdated since before 21 Sep, on 21 Sep I
have posted an updated PKGBUILD in AUR package page, and on 05 Oct I sent an
email to gersonruotolo. He don't answered my email, nor updated the package.
[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36163
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 6:02 AM, Renato Garcia wrote:
> Please orphan dos2unix[1]. It is outdated since before 21 Sep, on 21 Sep I
> have posted an updated PKGBUILD in AUR package page, and on 05 Oct I sent an
> email to gersonruotolo. He don't answered my email, nor updated the package.
>
> [1] h
I apologize if I'm doing something wrong, I'm uncomfortable with mailing
lists.
I submitted an AUR pkgbuild for python2-oggconvert, but it is no longer
necessary since the oggconvert maintainer updated to account for the python
upgrade. I couldn't find any information on the AUR site or the arch w
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 6:52 AM, Andrew M. Kluger wrote:
> I apologize if I'm doing something wrong, I'm uncomfortable with mailing
> lists.
You're not doing anything wrong.
> I submitted an AUR pkgbuild for python2-oggconvert, but it is no longer
> necessary since the oggconvert maintainer upda
19 matches
Mail list logo
