Re: [aur-general] Who wants a cloak on IRC?

2010-11-11 Thread Thomas Dziedzic
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Jan Steffens wrote: > On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:50 PM, Alper KANAT wrote: >> Is there a cloak for community members? (I'm co-founder of Turkish >> community) > > I'm sorry, we only give cloaks to Arch Linux developers and TUs. > A cloak is what I request.

Re: [aur-general] [deletion request] nvidia-opencl-headers

2010-11-11 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 2:30 AM, Stéphane Gaudreault wrote: > Could you please remove the nvidia-opencl-headers package ? > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42430 > It is no longer needed as these headers are availables again in nvidia-utils. Done!

[aur-general] [deletion request] nvidia-opencl-headers

2010-11-11 Thread Stéphane Gaudreault
Could you please remove the nvidia-opencl-headers package ? http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42430 It is no longer needed as these headers are availables again in nvidia-utils. Thanks, Stéphane

Re: [aur-general] to maintain or not to maintain... the maintainer doesn't any more.

2010-11-11 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 12:14 AM, Martti Kühne wrote: > the package salasaga is out of date and the maintainer has a bad email > address. Obviously, he's no longer interested in maintaining the > package as well. Please disown, I'll adopt and update. Done.

[aur-general] to maintain or not to maintain... the maintainer doesn't any more.

2010-11-11 Thread Martti Kühne
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 9:33 PM, Aurel Canciu wrote: > Hello! > I'm really sorry, I forgot about that account and no longer have access to > it unfortunately, I will send a message to aur-general to remove it. Thanks > for notifying me! > I will email you when that account will get removed so you c

Re: [aur-general] Who wants a cloak on IRC?

2010-11-11 Thread Jan Steffens
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:50 PM, Alper KANAT wrote: > Is there a cloak for community members? (I'm co-founder of Turkish > community) I'm sorry, we only give cloaks to Arch Linux developers and TUs.

Re: [aur-general] Who wants a cloak on IRC?

2010-11-11 Thread Alper KANAT
Is there a cloak for community members? (I'm co-founder of Turkish community) --- Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? 2010/11/11 Jan Steffens > 2010/11/11 Ángel Velásquez : > > > > +1 cloaks I need one too and some new TUs are needing cloaks too :-) > > > > Okay, I'm making a list for Aaron of TUs

[aur-general] Who wants a cloak on IRC?

2010-11-11 Thread Jan Steffens
2010/11/11 Ángel Velásquez : > > +1 cloaks I need one too and some new TUs are needing cloaks too :-) > Okay, I'm making a list for Aaron of TUs or devs who want a cloak. I need the IRC nicks. Please answer to this mail or Jabber (jan.steff...@gmail.com).

Re: [aur-general] [deletion request] gimp-mathmap-13

2010-11-11 Thread Lukáš Jirkovský
On 10 November 2010 22:18, Uli Armbruster wrote: > Hi > > I just discovered this package http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43383 > We have this plugin in the repos and the newer version is about to come in, > so nobody needs this package in the AUR. It even doesn't work, because > doxyge

Re: [aur-general] move acerhk to [unsupported]?

2010-11-11 Thread Ray Rashif
On 11 November 2010 20:32, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: > On 11.11.2010 11:54, Christopher Brannon wrote: >> It won't build against kernel 2.6.36.  There hasn't been a release in a >> long time.  According to the homepage, the upstream author is no longer >> actively supporting it.  IMHO, it should m

Re: [aur-general] move acerhk to [unsupported]?

2010-11-11 Thread Sven-Hendrik Haase
On 11.11.2010 11:54, Christopher Brannon wrote: > It won't build against kernel 2.6.36. There hasn't been a release in a > long time. According to the homepage, the upstream author is no longer > actively supporting it. IMHO, it should move. I could make more of an > effort to patch it if someo

Re: [aur-general] move acerhk to [unsupported]?

2010-11-11 Thread Gergely Imreh
On 11 November 2010 18:54, Christopher Brannon wrote: > It won't build against kernel 2.6.36.  There hasn't been a release in a > long time.  According to the homepage, the upstream author is no longer > actively supporting it.  IMHO, it should move.  I could make more of an > effort to patch it i

[aur-general] move acerhk to [unsupported]?

2010-11-11 Thread Christopher Brannon
It won't build against kernel 2.6.36. There hasn't been a release in a long time. According to the homepage, the upstream author is no longer actively supporting it. IMHO, it should move. I could make more of an effort to patch it if someone is *really* interested. -- Chris pgpGLGqpVdiQ2.pgp

Re: [aur-general] [deletion request] gimp-mathmap-13

2010-11-11 Thread Lukáš Jirkovský
On 10 November 2010 22:18, Uli Armbruster wrote: > Hi > > I just discovered this package http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43383 > We have this plugin in the repos and the newer version is about to come in, > so nobody needs this package in the AUR. It even doesn't work, because > doxyge