On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Phillip Smith wrote:
> Can someone please delete the "pamusb" package. It is a duplicate of
> "pam_usb"...
>
> I obviously didn't see pam_usb before creating pamusb.
>
> Thx,
> ~p
>
Done, thanks.
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 2:28 AM, Isaac Dupree
wrote:
> I nominate lightspark. It's a new Free Software Flash player that's been
> getting a lot of press and development lately. Let's make it easier for
> people to try it to see if it works for them yet! ^_^
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages
Can someone please delete the "pamusb" package. It is a duplicate of
"pam_usb"...
I obviously didn't see pam_usb before creating pamusb.
Thx,
~p
Am Tue, 14 Dec 2010 11:57:30 -0600
schrieb "Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227)" :
> Given my position, I'm exempting myself from this process, however I
> have to admit I'm intrigued by lightspark. I never would have heard
> of it if not for this message. Perhaps someone should do an article
> on it (
Excerpts from Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227)'s message of 2010-12-14 18:57:30
+0100:
> Given my position, I'm exempting myself from this process, however I have to
> admit I'm intrigued by lightspark. I never would have heard of it if not for
> this message. Perhaps someone should do an article on
Given my position, I'm exempting myself from this process, however I have to
admit I'm intrigued by lightspark. I never would have heard of it if not for
this message. Perhaps someone should do an article on it (or on Flash
alternatives in general) for Rolling Release?
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 2:28
I nominate lightspark. It's a new Free Software Flash player that's
been getting a lot of press and development lately. Let's make it
easier for people to try it to see if it works for them yet! ^_^
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39063
-Isaac
