On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 12:23 AM, Mike Sampson m...@sambodata.com wrote:
Task Warrior - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22085
Mike
Does anyone know why this package does not use upstream name ? There is no
way to tell this task package is Task Warrior except looking to the URI.
Hello,
Please delete xivo-client-git
(https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44283) as it has been renamed
to xivo-client-qt-git (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45228)
Thanks!
2011/1/10 Cédric Girard girard.ced...@gmail.com:
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 12:23 AM, Mike Sampson m...@sambodata.com wrote:
Task Warrior - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22085
Mike
Does anyone know why this package does not use upstream name ? There is no
way to tell this task
Le Monday 10 January 2011 11:24:32, Xavier D. a écrit :
Hello,
Please delete xivo-client-git
(https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44283) as it has been renamed
to xivo-client-qt-git (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45228)
Thanks!
Done!
++
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Magnus Therning mag...@therning.orgwrote:
2011/1/10 Cédric Girard girard.ced...@gmail.com:
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 12:23 AM, Mike Sampson m...@sambodata.com
wrote:
Task Warrior - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22085
Mike
Does
On Monday 10 January 2011 10:26:14 Magnus Therning wrote:
Does anyone know why this package does not use upstream name ? There is
no way to tell this task package is Task Warrior except looking to the
URI.
There's some confusion on the upstream page, taskwarrior.org. Text like
I would like to propose moving all of the orphans in [community] to
the aur by this Friday if no one has adopted them by then.
If one of your packages needs an orphan as a dependency, you must adopt it.
Orphans really deserve a maintainer and I would be more comfortable
with the package having a
On Monday 10 January 2011 08:35:30 Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
I would like to propose moving all of the orphans in [community] to
the aur by this Friday if no one has adopted them by then.
If one of your packages needs an orphan as a dependency, you must adopt it.
Orphans really deserve a
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 8:46 AM, Andrea Scarpino and...@archlinux.org wrote:
On Monday 10 January 2011 15:41:23 Andrea Scarpino wrote:
Can you provide a final list? I did this job some months ago and I don't
think that we have more orphans packages which can be moved.
Here[1] my previous list
On 10.01.2011 15:35, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
I would like to propose moving all of the orphans in [community] to
the aur by this Friday if no one has adopted them by then.
If one of your packages needs an orphan as a dependency, you must adopt it.
Orphans really deserve a maintainer and I
On Monday 10 January 2011 18:47:04 Sergej Pupykin wrote:
There are no out-of-date orphans and there are no unassigned
bugs in community section. Is there any reason of this cleanup?
Anyway this clean up count ~10 packages.
--
Andrea
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Thomas Dziedzic gos...@gmail.com wrote:
At Mon, 10 Jan 2011 08:35:30 -0600, Thomas Dziedzic gos...@gmail.com
wrote:
This is more of a assigning responsibility to a package sort of thing,
as I said, I would rather have it be in aur and have a maintainer then
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Laurent Carlier lordhea...@gmail.comwrote:
gdk-pixbuf cannot be moved to aur as it's a dependency of lazarus,
maintain by
Sergej.
I guess Sergej should adopt it.
Also let me point out that if you maintain package A and if the only reason
package B is in
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 09:49 -0600, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 8:46 AM, Andrea Scarpino and...@archlinux.org wrote:
On Monday 10 January 2011 15:41:23 Andrea Scarpino wrote:
Can you provide a final list? I did this job some months ago and I don't
think that we have more
Hi Thomas,
don't know what I have started..
I was just trying to report on a few issues I encountered while doing some
tests
with Grass (building 6.4 through ABS and Grass-svn through AUR).
Now I am involved in a whole discussion on orphans, deadlines,
responsabilities,
assignments etc...
On Monday 10 January 2011 11:26:00 Huub Munstege wrote:
This is more of a assigning responsibility to a package sort of thing,
as I said, I would rather have it be in aur and have a maintainer then
be in community and be an orphan.
Grass is maintained by Thomas and you already reported your
Hi,
no nothing, forget it.
Just wanted to send a mail to Thomas directly.
Saw afterwards it went to aur-gene...@archlinux.org.
Sorry again.
best regards
Huub Munstege
BPE 2836
Bamako, Rep. du Mali
Tel: +223 20226397
Port: +223 78370695
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Gordon JC Pearce gordon...@gjcp.net wrote:
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 09:49 -0600, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 8:46 AM, Andrea Scarpino and...@archlinux.org
wrote:
On Monday 10 January 2011 15:41:23 Andrea Scarpino wrote:
Can you provide a
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Thomas Dziedzic gos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Gordon JC Pearce gordon...@gjcp.net wrote:
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 09:49 -0600, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 8:46 AM, Andrea Scarpino and...@archlinux.org
wrote:
On
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 14:41 -0600, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
Note, I don't want to single you out, any tu can adopt it, the point
is it having a maintainer.
I'm not a TU so presumably I can't adopt it in community?
Errm... I can't figure out how to adopt it in community, either. Maybe
I
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Gordon JC Pearce gordon...@gjcp.net wrote:
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 14:41 -0600, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
Note, I don't want to single you out, any tu can adopt it, the point
is it having a maintainer.
I'm not a TU so presumably I can't adopt it in community?
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 12:05 AM, Ray Rashif sc...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 9 January 2011 03:27, Brad Fanella bradfane...@archlinux.us wrote:
So with the recent release of apvlv 0.1.0, I have decided to drop
maintaining it.
I believe it now supports UMD file reading of some sort, and this
Hi,
can somebody delete this packages...
1) obsolete
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45068
the package name was changed (see package comment by chmurli)
2) duplicate
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37238
the package is redundant (see package comment by alexwizard)
Thanks
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Matthias Rascher
paterbr...@silberhelme.de wrote:
Hi,
can somebody delete this packages...
1) obsolete
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45068
the package name was changed (see package comment by chmurli)
2) duplicate
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:30 PM, Brad Fanella bradfane...@archlinux.uswrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Matthias Rascher
paterbr...@silberhelme.de wrote:
Hi,
can somebody delete this packages...
1) obsolete
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45068
the package name was
2011/1/10 Cédric Girard girard.ced...@gmail.com
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:30 PM, Brad Fanella bradfane...@archlinux.us
wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Matthias Rascher
paterbr...@silberhelme.de wrote:
Hi,
can somebody delete this packages...
1) obsolete
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Thomas S Hatch thatc...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/1/10 Cédric Girard girard.ced...@gmail.com
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:30 PM, Brad Fanella bradfane...@archlinux.us
wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Matthias Rascher
paterbr...@silberhelme.de wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Brad Fanella bradfane...@archlinux.uswrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Thomas S Hatch thatc...@gmail.com
wrote:
2011/1/10 Cédric Girard girard.ced...@gmail.com
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:30 PM, Brad Fanella
bradfane...@archlinux.us
wrote:
On
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 17:01 -0700, Thomas S Hatch wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Brad Fanella bradfane...@archlinux.uswrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Thomas S Hatch thatc...@gmail.com
wrote:
2011/1/10 Cédric Girard girard.ced...@gmail.com
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at
2011/1/10 Ng Oon-Ee ngoo...@gmail.com:
On a related note: don't you guys
sleep/work/do-something-else-other-than-read-aur-general-mails? =)
Sleep? What is this sleep you speak of?
I've post the bug near half year.
Recently, I got a user require to renew PKGBUILD.
But, I think this is bug of AUR script paring problem. As I know
AUR's program will not modify. So, the simple method is delete the entry,
let me upload again.
If you know the admin of AUR, could you help me to
hello
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?K=SyntheadSeB=m
user owns 55 packages and has an invalid e-mail address. does anyone
happen to know him (or is willing to google after him)? I wonder. he
wouldn't get comment notifications, he wouldn't get ood bumps (afaik
both go to that address) and
2011/1/11 Cédric Girard girard.ced...@gmail.com:
What was the name of these packages ?
Using my brand new time machine, I went back in time and noted their
names; borderless-elementary-gtk-theme and nautilus-elementary-ur
respectively.
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 9:05 PM, Evangelos Foutras foutre...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/1/11 Cédric Girard girard.ced...@gmail.com:
What was the name of these packages ?
Using my brand new time machine, I went back in time and noted their
names; borderless-elementary-gtk-theme and
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:48:16AM +0800, Daniel Lin wrote:
I've post the bug near half year.
Recently, I got a user require to renew PKGBUILD.
But, I think this is bug of AUR script paring problem. As I know
AUR's program will not modify. So, the simple method is delete the entry,
let me
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Brad Fanella bradfane...@archlinux.uswrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 9:05 PM, Evangelos Foutras foutre...@gmail.com
wrote:
2011/1/11 Cédric Girard girard.ced...@gmail.com:
What was the name of these packages ?
Using my brand new time machine, I went back
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 5:02 AM, Martti Kühne mysat...@gmail.com wrote:
hello
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?K=SyntheadSeB=m
user owns 55 packages and has an invalid e-mail address. does anyone
happen to know him (or is willing to google after him)? I wonder. he
wouldn't get comment
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 5:13 AM, Thomas S Hatch thatc...@gmail.com wrote:
Really though what is this time machine?
I might have exaggerated a little bit about the time machine part. :3
...
Or maybe I do have a real time machine and I'm keeping its existence a
secret (albeit not doing a
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Evangelos Foutras foutre...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 5:13 AM, Thomas S Hatch thatc...@gmail.com
wrote:
Really though what is this time machine?
I might have exaggerated a little bit about the time machine part. :3
...
Or maybe I do
39 matches
Mail list logo
