Hi everyone,
Can someone please delete ttf-ms-extrafonts [1]; it has no maintainer
and as mutlu_inek said in the comments his ttf-vista-fonts [2]
provides the same fonts and has a more liberal license.
Regards,
Marcel
[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35297
[2] http://aur.archlinux.or
Hi,
can you please orphan libircclient?
==> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14047
The package is not outdated, but it does not build and install
any shared lib, also it installs headers into a no proper path
according to
==> http://packages.debian.org/squeeze/amd64/libircclient-dev/filel
Am 13.01.2011 16:00, schrieb Marcel Korpel:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Can someone please delete ttf-ms-extrafonts [1]; it has no maintainer
> and as mutlu_inek said in the comments his ttf-vista-fonts [2]
> provides the same fonts and has a more liberal license.
>
> Regards,
> Marcel
>
> [1] http://aur
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 04:59:06PM +0100, speps wrote:
> I have also sent him an e-mail without responses
You added an AUR comment just two days ago. How long did you wait for a
response to your mail? Two days are definitely too short and if the
maintainer turned mail notifications off, he might h
On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 16:57 +0100, Stefan Husmann wrote:
> Am 13.01.2011 16:00, schrieb Marcel Korpel:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > Can someone please delete ttf-ms-extrafonts [1]; it has no maintainer
> > and as mutlu_inek said in the comments his ttf-vista-fonts [2]
> > provides the same fonts and h
On Thursday 13 January 2011 17:01:42 Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 16:57 +0100, Stefan Husmann wrote:
> > Am 13.01.2011 16:00, schrieb Marcel Korpel:
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > Can someone please delete ttf-ms-extrafonts [1]; it has no maintainer
> > > and as mutlu_inek said in the
Am Donnerstag, 13. Januar 2011, 18:21:41 schrieb Peter Lewis:
> On Thursday 13 January 2011 17:01:42 Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 16:57 +0100, Stefan Husmann wrote:
> > > Am 13.01.2011 16:00, schrieb Marcel Korpel:
> > > > Hi everyone,
> > > >
> > > > Can someone please delete ttf-ms
2011/1/13 Christoph
> Am Donnerstag, 13. Januar 2011, 18:21:41 schrieb Peter Lewis:
> > On Thursday 13 January 2011 17:01:42 Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 16:57 +0100, Stefan Husmann wrote:
> > > > Am 13.01.2011 16:00, schrieb Marcel Korpel:
> > > > > Hi everyone,
> > > > >
> > > >
On 13/01/11 18:00, Christoph wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 13. Januar 2011, 18:21:41 schrieb Peter Lewis:
>> On Thursday 13 January 2011 17:01:42 Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 16:57 +0100, Stefan Husmann wrote:
Am 13.01.2011 16:00, schrieb Marcel Korpel:
> Hi everyone,
>
> C
On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 11:04 -0700, Thomas S Hatch wrote:
> 2011/1/13 Christoph
> > > Indeed!
> > >
> > > Even more OT, wouldn't it be kinda cool if there was a mailing list or
> > > something where people could post simply with news of new packages? I
> > can't
> > > imagine it would be very high
So, libnl 2.0 was declared stable in October as I just learned.
These packages are compatible with libnl 2.0:
- crda
- iw
- wpa_supplicant
- hostapd
These packages don't as far as I can see:
- libpcap
- networkmanager
These I didn't check:
- kismet
- net-snmp
- knemo
- libvirt
- simh
Can the re
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Joel Heaton wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 11:04 -0700, Thomas S Hatch wrote:
> > 2011/1/13 Christoph
> > > > Indeed!
> > > >
> > > > Even more OT, wouldn't it be kinda cool if there was a mailing list
> or
> > > > something where people could post simply with n
On Thursday 13 January 2011 18:00:12 Christoph wrote:
> > > Slight OT, thanks for pointing out this package, I now have more font
> > > compatibility than previously =)
> >
> > Indeed!
> >
> > Even more OT, wouldn't it be kinda cool if there was a mailing list or
> > something where people could
2011/1/13 Peter Lewis
> On Thursday 13 January 2011 18:00:12 Christoph wrote:
> > > > Slight OT, thanks for pointing out this package, I now have more font
> > > > compatibility than previously =)
> > >
> > > Indeed!
> > >
> > > Even more OT, wouldn't it be kinda cool if there was a mailing list
On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 18:55 +, Peter Lewis wrote:
> I had in mind a list with no automation, just a place where people could post
> notifications about a *new* package upload, not "foo is now at version 2.3".
> I
> don't think update notifications would be at all appropriate, unless they
>
Am Donnerstag, 13. Januar 2011, 19:55:58 schrieb Peter Lewis:
> On Thursday 13 January 2011 18:00:12 Christoph wrote:
> > > > Slight OT, thanks for pointing out this package, I now have more font
> > > > compatibility than previously =)
> > >
> > > Indeed!
> > >
> > > Even more OT, wouldn't it be
Hi guys,
last October, Don Stewart stepped down as maintainer of the Arch Haskell
project. Ever since then, I have been the primary maintainer of the PKGBUILD
database that he left behind. Now, a group of volunteers has combined forces
to provide the Arch Haskell ABS tree, which is a collection of
On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 18:55 +, Peter Lewis wrote:
> Okay. Let's wait for a few more opinions - this wouldn't have to be just AUR
> either. New stuff in the binary repos could be included too.
>
> Pete.
There ARE no new packages in the binary repos =p. From what I've seen,
everything starts l
Hi,
I'd like to submit this package to the AUR but, as it's my first
package, I'd like some reviews of the package before I send it.
Thanks !
Sebastien Duthil
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 05:46:43PM +0100, Sebastien Duthil wrote:
> I'd like to submit this package to the AUR but, as it's my first
> package, I'd like some reviews of the package before I send it.
Sooo...? Where is it? :p
Le 13/01/2011 23:50, Lukas Fleischer a écrit :
Sooo...? Where is it? :p
Sorry, mailing list newbie too, I attached the file to the first mail :-[
Here it is :
http://dl.free.fr/poeSUbf0M
Le 13/01/2011 17:53, Sebastien Duthil a écrit :
Here it is :
http://dl.free.fr/poeSUbf0M
Here is better
http://dl.free.fr/poeSUbf0M/gplanarity-16723-1.src.tar.gz
Sorry for the spam :-)
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 05:53:08PM +0100, Sebastien Duthil wrote:
> http://dl.free.fr/poeSUbf0M
You don't need to include "cairo" and "freetype2" in the "depends" array
as they are already satisfied by gtk2 or it's deps but except for that,
it looks good to me :)
On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 17:54 +0100, Sebastien Duthil wrote:
> Le 13/01/2011 17:53, Sebastien Duthil a écrit :
> > Here it is :
> >
> > http://dl.free.fr/poeSUbf0M
> Here is better
>
> http://dl.free.fr/poeSUbf0M/gplanarity-16723-1.src.tar.gz
>
> Sorry for the spam :-)
>
Well, it builds, it doesn
On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 17:54 +0100, Sebastien Duthil wrote:
> Le 13/01/2011 17:53, Sebastien Duthil a écrit :
> > Here it is :
> >
> > http://dl.free.fr/poeSUbf0M
> Here is better
>
> http://dl.free.fr/poeSUbf0M/gplanarity-16723-1.src.tar.gz
>
> Sorry for the spam :-)
Checked it over and it works
On Thursday, January 13, 2011 17:54:19 Sebastien Duthil wrote:
> Le 13/01/2011 17:53, Sebastien Duthil a écrit :
> > Here it is :
> >
> > http://dl.free.fr/poeSUbf0M
>
> Here is better
>
> http://dl.free.fr/poeSUbf0M/gplanarity-16723-1.src.tar.gz
>
> Sorry for the spam :-)
Just being pedantic, but
Le 14/01/2011 00:02, Lukas Fleischer a écrit :
You don't need to include "cairo" and "freetype2" in the "depends" array
as they are already satisfied by gtk2 or it's deps but except for that,
Done. Thank you !
Le 14/01/2011 00:15, Dan Vratil a écrit :
Just being pedantic, but you should use "
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Peter Simons wrote:
> As of today, about 300 packages are known to be out-of-date. A complete list
> is attached below. Now, I reckon that it would be polite to mark those
> packages out-of-date, so that AUR users are aware of this fact. I have no
> idea how to acc
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 09:53:38PM +0100, Peter Simons wrote:
> As you know, the 'arch-haskell' user on AUR owns some 1,990 packages. Since
> our attention has shifted to HABS, those packages are no longer maintained.
> We do try to keep some of them up-to-date when we have the chance, but it's
> n
Hi Justin, hi Lukas,
> I flagged the listed packages out of date for you by using a script.
thanks a lot for your help!
> Could you try to avoid uploading packages to the AUR that are already
> available in [extra] or [community]?
Yes, of course, that shouldn't happen. If you are aware of a
The "netbeans-se" package should have been called "netbeans-javase", since
NetBeans is about more than just Java. For this reason, I've just uploaded
a "netbeans-javase" package to AUR.
The "netbeans-se" package was orphaned by its original maintainer, so I
adopted it temporarily. Please don't s
I wrote a little AUR helper in C++, though currently it only downloads
the tarball if the package name is valid. I am new to C++ and wanted to
know if you thought the code was good. I was thinking about putting it
in AUR, but figured I would asked for opinion first. Here is the url for
the code
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Nathan Owens wrote:
> I wrote a little AUR helper in C++, though currently it only downloads the
> tarball if the package name is valid. I am new to C++ and wanted to know if
> you thought the code was good. I was thinking about putting it in AUR, but
> figured I w
On 01/13/2011 07:46 PM, Brad Fanella wrote:
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Nathan Owens wrote:
I wrote a little AUR helper in C++, though currently it only downloads the
tarball if the package name is valid. I am new to C++ and wanted to know if
you thought the code was good. I was thinking a
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Nathan Owens wrote:
> On 01/13/2011 07:46 PM, Brad Fanella wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Nathan Owens
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I wrote a little AUR helper in C++, though currently it only downloads
>>> the
>>> tarball if the package name is valid. I am ne
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Xavion wrote:
> The "netbeans-se" package should have been called "netbeans-javase", since
> NetBeans is about more than just Java. For this reason, I've just uploaded
> a "netbeans-javase" package to AUR.
>
> The "netbeans-se" package was orphaned by its original
On 01/13/2011 08:08 PM, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Nathan Owens wrote:
On 01/13/2011 07:46 PM, Brad Fanella wrote:
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Nathan Owens
wrote:
I wrote a little AUR helper in C++, though currently it only downloads
the
tarball if the pack
On 14 January 2011 15:57, Nathan Owens wrote:
> I wrote a little AUR helper in C++, though currently it only downloads the
> tarball if the package name is valid. I am new to C++ and wanted to know if
> you thought the code was good. I was thinking about putting it in AUR, but
> figured I would a
On 01/13/2011 08:41 PM, Jonathan Conder wrote:
On 14 January 2011 15:57, Nathan Owens wrote:
I wrote a little AUR helper in C++, though currently it only downloads the
tarball if the package name is valid. I am new to C++ and wanted to know if
you thought the code was good. I was thinking abou
2011/1/13 Peter Lewis :
> On Thursday 13 January 2011 18:00:12 Christoph wrote:
> Okay. Let's wait for a few more opinions - this wouldn't have to be just AUR
> either. New stuff in the binary repos could be included too.
Great idea! If traffic is not heavy, information wite succinctly, this
will b
2011/1/13 Ng Oon-Ee
> On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 18:55 +, Peter Lewis wrote:
> > Okay. Let's wait for a few more opinions - this wouldn't have to be just
> AUR
> > either. New stuff in the binary repos could be included too.
> >
> > Pete.
>
> There ARE no new packages in the binary repos =p. From
On 01/13/2011 10:13 PM, Nathan Owens wrote:
On 01/13/2011 08:41 PM, Jonathan Conder wrote:
On 14 January 2011 15:57, Nathan Owens wrote:
I wrote a little AUR helper in C++, though currently it only
downloads the
tarball if the package name is valid. I am new to C++ and wanted to
know if
you
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 12:36 AM, Nathan Owens wrote:
> On 01/13/2011 10:13 PM, Nathan Owens wrote:
>>
>> On 01/13/2011 08:41 PM, Jonathan Conder wrote:
>>>
>>> On 14 January 2011 15:57, Nathan Owens wrote:
>>>
I wrote a little AUR helper in C++, though currently it only downloads
the
>
On 01/14/2011 12:12 AM, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 12:36 AM, Nathan Owens wrote:
On 01/13/2011 10:13 PM, Nathan Owens wrote:
On 01/13/2011 08:41 PM, Jonathan Conder wrote:
On 14 January 2011 15:57, Nathan Owenswrote:
I wrote a little AUR helper in C++, though current
44 matches
Mail list logo
