[aur-general] [AUR] Deletion request

Hi TUs, please delete the following packages: gnome-themes-svn [1], gnome-themes-extras-svn [2] and gtk-engines-svn [3]. They're useless since GNOME has moved to git. Thanks in advance. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15805 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15778

Re: [aur-general] TU application (Kyle Keen)

On 03/02/2011 05:36 PM, keenerd wrote: Hi guys. I am Kyle Keen (keenerd) and am applying to be a TU, sponsored by Xyne. You might remember me from a past application three months ago (1). Very little has changed since then, though I do have a few more packages (2). I also started up the first

Re: [aur-general] [AUR] Deletion request

On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 12:08 +0100, Alessio Sergi wrote: > Hi TUs, > please delete the following packages: gnome-themes-svn [1], > gnome-themes-extras-svn [2] and gtk-engines-svn [3]. > They're useless since GNOME has moved to git. > > Thanks in advance. > > [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.

Re: [aur-general] TU application (Kyle Keen)

On 3/3/11, Ionuț Bîru wrote: > On 03/02/2011 05:36 PM, keenerd wrote: >> Hi guys. >> >> I am Kyle Keen (keenerd) and am applying to be a TU, sponsored by >> Xyne. You might remember me from a past application three months ago > > last time, if i remember well, you redraw your application in the l

Re: [aur-general] TU application (Kyle Keen)

On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 6:03 AM, keenerd wrote: > On 3/3/11, Ionuț Bîru wrote: >> On 03/02/2011 05:36 PM, keenerd wrote: >>> Hi guys. >>> >>> I am Kyle Keen (keenerd) and am applying to be a TU, sponsored by >>> Xyne.  You might remember me from a past application three months ago >> >> last time,

[aur-general] package submission

I have created a new package build for SVox Pico, a small speech synthesis engine, and I'm in the process of submitting it to AUR. I must choose a category on the submission page. SVox Pico consists of a library for producing speech output as well as a utility that converts text on the command

Re: [aur-general] package submission

Kyle writes: > Would lib be best, or is there > something else that may fit better? How about "multimedia"? -- Chris

Re: [aur-general] package submission

Op 3 mrt. 2011 17:45 schreef "Christopher Brannon" het volgende: > > Kyle writes: > > > Would lib be best, or is there > > something else that may fit better? > > How about "multimedia"? > > -- Chris It would make sense if you could choose multiple categories...categories are always confusing.

Re: [aur-general] package submission

I thought of that as well. Thanks, I think multimedia does work better. ~Kyle

Re: [aur-general] package submission

Yes, maybe more like "tags" not categories. We from pro audio miss a more specific category too, like "pro audio", since multimedia is much to much to much broad!!

Re: [aur-general] TU application (Kyle Keen)

On 3/3/11, keenerd wrote: > I want to be a TU now for the same reasons I wanted to be a TU then. > Arch sucks and it could really use any help it can get ;-) I don't think the phrasing here is really for your benefit. Det

Re: [aur-general] TU application (Kyle Keen)

On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Det wrote: > On 3/3/11, keenerd wrote: > > I want to be a TU now for the same reasons I wanted to be a TU then. > > Arch sucks and it could really use any help it can get ;-) > > I don't think the phrasing here is really for your benefit. > > Det > I think he i

[aur-general] Obsoleted packages removal request.

The following package is obsolete and I believe should be removed: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27279 grub2-gfxmenu-overlay The following packages are a little less clear, but in the end I believe should also be removed, as they have a few problems: They rely on grub2-gfxmenu, which i

Re: [aur-general] package submission

On 4 March 2011 01:01, Bernardo Barros wrote: > Yes, maybe more like "tags" not categories. We from pro audio miss a > more specific category too, like "pro audio", since multimedia is much > to much to much broad!! Not really. It is still under "Multimedia", generally. Only in technical circles

Re: [aur-general] package submission

2011/3/3 Ray Rashif : > Not really. It is still under "Multimedia", generally. Only in > technical circles does it get more cognitive and/or disciplined > relationships, like "Electronics" and "Engineering". As far as we're > talking about software, it's all just multimedia :) > I'm talking about

Re: [aur-general] package submission

Well, with "tags" you could put more then one tag in a package. That's my feature request for next AUR release! :-)

Re: [aur-general] package submission

On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 17:03 -0300, Bernardo Barros wrote: > 2011/3/3 Ray Rashif : > > Not really. It is still under "Multimedia", generally. Only in > > technical circles does it get more cognitive and/or disciplined > > relationships, like "Electronics" and "Engineering". As far as we're > > talki

Re: [aur-general] TU application (Kyle Keen)

On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Thomas S Hatch wrote: > On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Det wrote: > >> On 3/3/11, keenerd wrote: >> > I want to be a TU now for the same reasons I wanted to be a TU then. >> > Arch sucks and it could really use any help it can get ;-) >> >> I don't think the ph

Re: [aur-general] TU application (Kyle Keen)

On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Thomas Dziedzic wrote: > On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Thomas S Hatch > wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Det wrote: > > > >> On 3/3/11, keenerd wrote: > >> > I want to be a TU now for the same reasons I wanted to be a TU then. > >> > Arch sucks and

Re: [aur-general] TU application (Kyle Keen)

Thomas S Hatch wrote: > > Well, in a sense arch *does* suck in some ways, but it sucks less, as > > the saying goes :) > > > Well said, I mean we all suck, I just hope I suck less today than I did > yesterday That's what she said. *ducks*

Re: [aur-general] TU application (Kyle Keen)

On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 22:23 +0100, Xyne wrote: > Thomas S Hatch wrote: > > > > Well, in a sense arch *does* suck in some ways, but it sucks less, as > > > the saying goes :) > > > > > Well said, I mean we all suck, I just hope I suck less today than I did > > yesterday > > That's what she said. >

Re: [aur-general] TU application (Kyle Keen)

2011/3/3 Ng Oon-Ee > On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 22:23 +0100, Xyne wrote: > > Thomas S Hatch wrote: > > > > > > Well, in a sense arch *does* suck in some ways, but it sucks less, as > > > > the saying goes :) > > > > > > > Well said, I mean we all suck, I just hope I suck less today than I did > > > ye

Re: [aur-general] TU application (Kyle Keen)

On 3/3/11, Thomas S Hatch wrote: > Should I ask him to explain how the python GIL works? In one word: poorly. Not that I care, my laptop is single core and in-order to boot. If I had one of those pretty six core Phenoms I'd be switching my code over to Stackless faster than you can say lock con

Re: [aur-general] TU application (Kyle Keen)

On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 5:04 PM, keenerd wrote: > On 3/3/11, Thomas S Hatch wrote: >> Should I ask him to explain how the python GIL works? > > In one word: poorly.  Not that I care, my laptop is single core and > in-order to boot.  If I had one of those pretty six core Phenoms I'd > be switching

Re: [aur-general] TU application (Kyle Keen)

On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 8:06 PM, Thomas Dziedzic wrote: > On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 5:04 PM, keenerd wrote: > > On 3/3/11, Thomas S Hatch wrote: > >> Should I ask him to explain how the python GIL works? > > > > In one word: poorly. Not that I care, my laptop is single core and > > in-order to boo