On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Ionuț Bîru ib...@archlinux.org wrote:
Hi,
i don't have too much time left for myself and i want to cut down some
duties in arch.
See you guys in devland :)
http://www.archlinux.org/packages/?sort=repo=Communityq=maintainer=ibirulast_update=flagged=limit=50
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 7:04 PM, helq alluqa linuxero...@gmail.com wrote:
please disown the next package
ninja-ide
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46017
the user dont respond any request, by message in aur page and email, for at
least a few weeks and, the package is outdated for a
2011/3/15 Thomas Dziedzic gos...@gmail.com
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 7:04 PM, helq alluqa linuxero...@gmail.com
wrote:
please disown the next package
ninja-ide
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46017
the user dont respond any request, by message in aur page and email, for
at
Package foo exists in [extra], and foo-devel in the AUR.
foo-devel is obviously based off unstable tarball releases (otherwise it
would be foo-git, foo-svn, foo-hg or similar).
So let's say foo is at version 4.0 (stable), should foo-devel stay at
3.9 (the last beta/rc/unstable release) or update
2011/3/16 Ng Oon-Ee ngoo...@gmail.com:
Package foo exists in [extra], and foo-devel in the AUR.
foo-devel is obviously based off unstable tarball releases (otherwise it
would be foo-git, foo-svn, foo-hg or similar).
So let's say foo is at version 4.0 (stable), should foo-devel stay at
3.9
