Am 30.03.2011 23:06, schrieb william 56:
> i am requesting that stormlib become orphaned, and stormlib-linux be deleted.
> stormlib-linux (21638) appears to be a duplicate of stormlib (21634),
> and both packages are unbuildable, as the stormlib source archive
> which both aur packages compile from
Not to keep bugging your mailboxes but I suppose the only real reasons
for keeping all those nvidia-specific-kernel packages in the AUR boils
down to these:
1) The user wants to install an Nvidia driver for a non-booted kernel,
yet he doesn't want to install the driver for any the other kernels
si
2011/3/31 Det :
> Not to keep bugging your mailboxes but I suppose the only real reasons
> for keeping all those nvidia-specific-kernel packages in the AUR boils
> down to these:
>
> 1) The user wants to install an Nvidia driver for a non-booted kernel,
> yet he doesn't want to install the driver f
I started maintaining some Python 2 packages that currently use the
python- prefix, but need to be renamed to use python2-. Python 3
versions will soon come out, so I don't want people using the python-*
package until then. I want to still have the packages in the AUR so
that someone doesn't accide
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 1:39 AM, Rémy Oudompheng
wrote:
> 2011/3/31 Det :
>> Not to keep bugging your mailboxes but I suppose the only real reasons
>> for keeping all those nvidia-specific-kernel packages in the AUR boils
>> down to these:
>>
>> 1) The user wants to install an Nvidia driver for a n
I created a basic gtk3 package in AUR, though later I noticed that there
is a gnome-unstable repository, with gtk3 in it. Please delete my gtk3
package in AUR, I don't want it to start conflicting with gnome-unstable
things and it is also redundant as it turns out. So I guess it is
probably unw
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 12:25 AM, Károly Pados wrote:
> I created a basic gtk3 package in AUR, though later I noticed that there is
> a gnome-unstable repository, with gtk3 in it. Please delete my gtk3 package
> in AUR, I don't want it to start conflicting with gnome-unstable things and
Removed. :
Am 31.03.2011 21:21, schrieb Aaron DeVore:
> I started maintaining some Python 2 packages that currently use the
> python- prefix, but need to be renamed to use python2-. Python 3
> versions will soon come out, so I don't want people using the python-*
> package until then. I want to still have the
On 2011/3/31 Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> I agree with the concept. However, in your opinion does
> nvidia-beta-all fall under non-reproducible? It does different things
> on different machines, but entirely in a non-interactive way. In case
> you don't want to bother to take a look at the PKGBUILD (I would
Thanks for your response Rémy,
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 7:54 AM, Rémy Oudompheng
wrote:
> My definition was not about interactivity but dynamic nature.
> nvidia-beta-all is dynamic in the sense that it *computes* local
> variables that influence the resulting package. A reproducible package
> does
I've seen (in the past) various packages on the AUR which jumped by 3
or 4 pkgrels in a very short period of time. Sometimes it happens like
this:-
1. Maintainer changes something and breaks the package with pkgrel=2
2. Bug reported on comments. Maintainer reverts change and makes pkgrel=3
It can
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 08:12:42AM +0800, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> I've seen (in the past) various packages on the AUR which jumped by 3
> or 4 pkgrels in a very short period of time. Sometimes it happens like
> this:-
>
> 1. Maintainer changes something and breaks the package with pkgrel=2
> 2. Bug rep
Am Fri, 1 Apr 2011 08:12:42 +0800
schrieb Oon-Ee Ng :
> I've seen (in the past) various packages on the AUR which jumped by 3
> or 4 pkgrels in a very short period of time. Sometimes it happens like
> this:-
>
> 1. Maintainer changes something and breaks the package with pkgrel=2
> 2. Bug reporte
I submitted the package this morning but regretted it almost
immediately. It does not meet the submission guidelines (doesn't
download/verify) and my spacechem-demo PKGBUILD can also be used for
the purchased full game anyway.
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 4:11 AM, Alex Griffin wrote:
> I submitted the package this morning but regretted it almost
> immediately. It does not meet the submission guidelines (doesn't
> download/verify) and my spacechem-demo PKGBUILD can also be used for
> the purchased full game anyway.
Removed, t
Hi, can your delete my break packages, please?
- ryzom_client_open
- ryzom-server-hg
- ryzom-client-hg
Thx. and sorry for this...
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 4:37 AM, Caemir wrote:
> Hi, can your delete my break packages, please?
>
> - ryzom_client_open
> - ryzom-server-hg
> - ryzom-client-hg
Done. Please include links to the packages in the future. :)
17 matches
Mail list logo
