Please remove xcursorgen[1]. It can be found in [extra] as xorg-xcursorgen[2].
[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=8114
[2] http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/xorg-xcursorgen/
On 4 April 2011 11:20, Astor Castelo amcast...@gatech.edu wrote:
Please remove xcursorgen[1]. It can be found in [extra] as xorg-xcursorgen[2].
[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=8114
[2] http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/xorg-xcursorgen/
Done. Thank you.
Lukas
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Rémy Oudompheng
remyoudomph...@gmail.comwrote:
However, renaming a package can be a good reason, if the current
maintainer agrees and if the package with a new name is uploaded at
the same time.
But I don't understand. Wasn't it decided that renaming from
Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
Hi,
I just wanted to let you know that I've moved the new Reflector to
[community].
Given that it is a direct replacement for the old one, I didn't see any
reason
to pass through the AUR voting stage.
Oh, and I buried the old one out in the back near the shed.
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote:
Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
Hi,
I just wanted to let you know that I've moved the new Reflector to
[community].
Given that it is a direct replacement for the old one, I didn't see any
reason
to pass through the AUR voting stage.
Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
Indirectly comparing your old project to excrement?
Indirectly comparing it to a dead body. But hey, if you bury excrement in
your
back yard, who am I to judge you? At least it's not as bad as what Kaiting
does
in his back yard.
Ah. I seem to lack some cultural
Le 3 avril 2011 22:23:42, Loui Chang a écrit :
On Sun 03 Apr 2011 23:16 +0200, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 11:00:24PM +0200, Baptiste wrote:
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 10:36:03PM +0200, Pierre Bourdon wrote:
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 22:30, Baptiste zersto...@free.fr wrote:
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 10:11 PM, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote:
Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
Indirectly comparing your old project to excrement?
Indirectly comparing it to a dead body. But hey, if you bury excrement in
your
back yard, who am I to judge you? At least it's not as bad as what Kaiting
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Stéphane Gaudreault
steph...@archlinux.orgwrote:
Le 3 avril 2011 22:23:42, Loui Chang a écrit :
Mainly because 'suivre' means 'follow' rather than 'notify'. I didn't
want to be pushing something incorrect that someone else would complain
about again.
Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 10:11 PM, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote:
p.s. Please stop CC'ing me replies. It just sends duplicate messages to other
folders.
Sorry about that, gmail doesn't like MLs
GMail actually does like mailing lists. Just do not use the Reply to
all button.
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 05:02:38PM +0200, Cédric Girard wrote:
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Stéphane Gaudreault
steph...@archlinux.orgwrote:
Le 3 avril 2011 22:23:42, Loui Chang a écrit :
Mainly because 'suivre' means 'follow' rather than 'notify'. I didn't
want to be pushing
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:24 PM, Wieland Hoffmann
themi...@googlemail.com wrote:
Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 10:11 PM, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote:
p.s. Please stop CC'ing me replies. It just sends duplicate messages to
other
folders.
Sorry about that, gmail doesn't like
Le 04/04/2011 16:50, Stéphane Gaudreault a écrit :
Le 3 avril 2011 22:23:42, Loui Chang a écrit :
On Sun 03 Apr 2011 23:16 +0200, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 11:00:24PM +0200, Baptiste wrote:
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 10:36:03PM +0200, Pierre Bourdon wrote:
On Sun, Apr 3,
13 matches
Mail list logo
