[aur-general] Removal request

2011-04-20 Thread H . Gökhan Sarı
Hello, Can you please remove my package conextant-firmware*? I think it is obsolete now. Thanks, [0]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19148 -- To do the same thing over and over again is not only boredom: it is to be controlled by rather than to control what you do. -Heraclitus H.Gökh

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

2011-04-20 Thread Jelle van der Waa
On 04/20/2011 09:42 AM, H.Gökhan Sarı wrote: Hello, Can you please remove my package conextant-firmware*? I think it is obsolete now. Thanks, [0]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19148 Done, thanks for the email :) -- Jelle van der Waa

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request for python-tox and python-virtualenv5

2011-04-20 Thread Sebastian Wiesner
2011/4/19 Evangelos Foutras : > On 19 April 2011 20:10, Sebastian Wiesner wrote: >> Hi, >> >> please remove python-virtualenv5 and python-tox, these packages have >> been replaced with python2-tox and python2-virtualenv5. > > Done. Please provide links in future removal requests. Sure. Sorry for

[aur-general] Orphan request

2011-04-20 Thread kevku
Req orphan of acroread-fonts-systemwide http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29472 no reply from maintainer.

[aur-general] Package Removal Request: yajl-ruby, redcloth

2011-04-20 Thread talki walki
yajl-ruby and redcloth are two of the packages I maintain currently. To follow the package naming conventions, I'd like to prefix both pkgnames with ruby-. I've already submitted/adopted the new packages to AUR, so here's for removing the yajl-ruby and redcloth packages. Sorry for any inconvenien

Re: [aur-general] Orphan request

2011-04-20 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On 20 April 2011 12:21, kevku wrote: > Req orphan of acroread-fonts-systemwide > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29472 > no reply from maintainer. Done. (I also orphaned amazonmp3 [1], by the same maintainer.) [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31614

Re: [aur-general] Package Removal Request: yajl-ruby, redcloth

2011-04-20 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On 20 April 2011 14:23, talki walki wrote: > yajl-ruby and redcloth are two of the packages I maintain currently. > > To follow the package naming conventions, I'd like to prefix both > pkgnames with ruby-. I've already submitted/adopted the new packages > to AUR, so here's for removing the yajl-r

Re: [aur-general] Package Removal Request: yajl-ruby, redcloth

2011-04-20 Thread talki walki
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Evangelos Foutras wrote: > I removed both packages. However, ruby-yajl (without the -ruby suffix) > would be a better name for the first package. If you want, go ahead > and re-upload it under the new name, and reply here to delete > ruby-yajl-ruby. > I named it r

[aur-general] smarch's scripts

2011-04-20 Thread Grigorios Bouzakis
Hello, can someone explain to me how this guys scripts [1] are supposed to produce working packages? Unless i am missing something, i'd have to use black magic in order to obtain the source which isnt even available in the sourceforge SVN of the projects. Since they already have 5 votes they must b

Re: [aur-general] Package Removal Request: yajl-ruby, redcloth

2011-04-20 Thread talki walki
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 7:54 PM, talki walki wrote: > Is there a documentation on this package naming convention? > Never mind, I found it here: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Ruby_Gem_Package_Guidelines pkgname=ruby-GEMNAME # All lowercase

Re: [aur-general] smarch's scripts

2011-04-20 Thread Cédric Girard
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: > Hello, > can someone explain to me how this guys scripts [1] are supposed to > produce working packages? > Unless i am missing something, i'd have to use black magic in order to > obtain the source which isnt even available in the source

Re: [aur-general] smarch's scripts

2011-04-20 Thread Christophe Chapuis
zpacman (for example) is included in the archive that comes with the PKGBUILD. It's a shell script, so there's nothing to build or retrieve, therefore it just installs it where it should. However, you're right, that's not the way a PKGBUILD is supposed to work: it should retrieve the zpacman shell

Re: [aur-general] smarch's scripts

2011-04-20 Thread talki walki
I would say the PKGBUILD is *wrong* $startdir should never be used, and checksums of source files must be included.

Re: [aur-general] smarch's scripts

2011-04-20 Thread Grigorios Bouzakis
talki walki wrote: > I would say the PKGBUILD is *wrong* > > $startdir should never be used, and checksums of source files must be > included. > pkgrel=0 is really innovative. It never even crossed my mind that someone would include the sources in the uploaded tarball, furthermore without provi

Re: [aur-general] Package Removal Request: yajl-ruby, redcloth

2011-04-20 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On 20 April 2011 14:54, talki walki wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Evangelos Foutras > wrote: >> I removed both packages. However, ruby-yajl (without the -ruby suffix) >> would be a better name for the first package. If you want, go ahead >> and re-upload it under the new name, and re

Re: [aur-general] Package Removal Request: yajl-ruby, redcloth

2011-04-20 Thread talki walki
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Evangelos Foutras wrote: > and there is ruby-sqlite3 which is actively maintained. Oops, I missed it, sorry. OK, I followed kidoz/bash and renamed my package to ruby-yajl... But wait... I double checked: ruby-sqlite3 is actually different from ${ruby-,}sqlite3-r

Re: [aur-general] Package Removal Request: yajl-ruby, redcloth

2011-04-20 Thread Pierre Chapuis
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 20:57:55 +0800, talki walki wrote: But wait... I double checked: ruby-sqlite3 is actually different from ${ruby-,}sqlite3-ruby: ruby-sqlite3: http://rubygems.org/gems/sqlite3 sqlite3-ruby: http://rubygems.org/gems/sqlite3-ruby That's the same gem, and a duplicate o

Re: [aur-general] Package Removal Request: yajl-ruby, redcloth

2011-04-20 Thread talki walki
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 8:57 PM, talki walki wrote: >    ruby-sqlite3: http://rubygems.org/gems/sqlite3 >    sqlite3-ruby: http://rubygems.org/gems/sqlite3-ruby > > I don't think these two gems are the same one. Sorry for double posting again... For the sake of completeness: I checked the AUR com

Re: [aur-general] Package Removal Request: yajl-ruby, redcloth

2011-04-20 Thread talki walki
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Pierre Chapuis wrote: > Moreover you require "yajl" or "sqlite3", not "yajl-ruby" or "sqlite3-ruby". > So I'm for "ruby-yajl". > OK, that's a point. 2 to 1, I give in. Now please remove ruby-yajl-ruby, Foutras.

Re: [aur-general] Package Removal Request: yajl-ruby, redcloth

2011-04-20 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On 20 April 2011 16:23, talki walki wrote: > Now please remove ruby-yajl-ruby, Foutras. Done, cheers.

[aur-general] Why do we use --config-dir ./ in /usr/share/pacman/PKGBUILD-svn.proto ?

2011-04-20 Thread Manu
Hi all, I'm creating a svn PKGBUILD. I'm behind a proxy, so I set the useful variables in ~/.subversion/server . Why the PKGBUILD template override this location with current dir by default ? Is it bad to drop --config-dir ./ in my PKGBUILD ? Regards, Manu

Re: [aur-general] Why do we use --config-dir ./ in /usr/share/pacman/PKGBUILD-svn.proto ?

2011-04-20 Thread Baptiste
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 04:43:34PM +0200, Manu wrote: > Hi all, Hi > I'm creating a svn PKGBUILD. I'm behind a proxy, so I set the useful > variables in ~/.subversion/server . Why the PKGBUILD template override > this location with current dir by default ? When running into similar problems with