Re: [aur-general] optional dependencies that require explicit installation

2011-05-17 Thread Michael Schubert
2011/5/17 Ray Rashif sc...@archlinux.org That's the way it's done. You have those optdeps as makedeps so you can finish building the package. Sorry if I was a bit unclear earlier. The make process does not need all binding languages as dependencies as cmake and configure take care of

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request for pcsx2-bin and pcsx2-svn-bin

2011-05-17 Thread Anton Shestakov
2011/5/17 rafael ff1 rafael.f...@gmail.com: If there is no source package I personally prefer the pcsx2 name (without the -bin suffix). Agree with you. But hey, there IS a source code package: http://pcsx2.net/downloads.php Maybe it was added in time of the recent 0.9.8 release.

Re: [aur-general] [arch-general] DropBox problem

2011-05-17 Thread Cédric Girard
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Bernardo Barros bernardobarr...@gmail.comwrote: Recently I am having problems with DropBox. I have it installed (1.1.31-1)and there is indeed a file named /opt/dropbox/dropbox, but the daemon seems not to find it: ~/ dropboxd /usr/bin/dropboxd: line 10:

Re: [aur-general] [arch-general] DropBox problem

2011-05-17 Thread Bernardo Barros
2011/5/17 Nicolas nico...@slubman.info: On 17/05/2011 16:25, Bernardo Barros wrote: Looks like you have not downloded the good architecure (i686 or x86_64) package for your computer. What is the output of: file /usr/bin/dropboxd It's the same... ~/ /usr/bin/dropboxd /usr/bin/dropboxd:

Re: [aur-general] [arch-general] DropBox problem

2011-05-17 Thread Bernardo Barros
2011/5/17 Cédric Girard girard.ced...@gmail.com: There is no such things as DropBox in the official repo. Please post to aur-general instead. Sorry. (Tell me if there is a better / better-supported alternative.)

Re: [aur-general] rodent, first upload

2011-05-17 Thread Iñigo Álvarez
Corrected, thanks

Re: [aur-general] [arch-general] DropBox problem

2011-05-17 Thread Ángel Velásquez
2011/5/17 Bernardo Barros bernardobarr...@gmail.com: 2011/5/17 Ángel Velásquez an...@archlinux.org: And answering your question, I don't know if there is any kind of alternative worst or better on the repos (I don't use dropbox or similar), the fact is, you are asking about unofficial

Re: [aur-general] optional dependencies that require explicit installation

2011-05-17 Thread Ray Rashif
On 17 May 2011 18:14, Michael Schubert mschu@gmail.com wrote: 2011/5/17 Ray Rashif sc...@archlinux.org That's the way it's done. You have those optdeps as makedeps so you can finish building the package. Sorry if I was a bit unclear earlier. The make process does not need all binding

[aur-general] Deletion request

2011-05-17 Thread Alessio Sergi
Hi TUs, please delete nautilus-wallpaper [1] cause it's now replaced by nautilus2-wallpaper [2]. Thanks in advance. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=3690 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49140 -- Alessio Sergi

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

2011-05-17 Thread Jelle van der Waa
On 05/17/2011 10:30 PM, Alessio Sergi wrote: Hi TUs, please delete nautilus-wallpaper [1] cause it's now replaced by nautilus2-wallpaper [2]. Thanks in advance. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=3690 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49140 Done -- Jelle van der Waa

[aur-general] Delete Request: crar-latest crark-cuda-latest

2011-05-17 Thread SpinFlo
hello. please removal these packages http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39158 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39159 i renamed these packages with other name, and upload to aur greetings

Re: [aur-general] Delete Request: crar-latest crark-cuda-latest

2011-05-17 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On 18 May 2011 03:00, SpinFlo sl1pk...@gmail.com wrote: hello. please removal these packages http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39158 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39159 Done, thanks!