Re: [aur-general] Deletion Request

On Jul 22, 2011 2:46 AM, "Evangelos Foutras" wrote: > > On 22 July 2011 03:16, H.Gökhan Sarı wrote: > > Hello, > > aldabra package is not maintained anymore because it is replaced by > > gtk-theme-aldabra due to naming issues. Can you please delete old aldabra > > package? > > No. > > > > > > > >

Re: [aur-general] Deletion Request

On 07/22/2011 10:18 AM, Kwpolska wrote: On Jul 22, 2011 2:46 AM, "Evangelos Foutras" wrote: On 22 July 2011 03:16, H.Gökhan Sarı wrote: Hello, aldabra package is not maintained anymore because it is replaced by gtk-theme-aldabra due to naming issues. Can you please delete old aldabra packa

Re: [aur-general] Deletion Request

On 22 July 2011 10:18, Kwpolska wrote: > Please, don't act like AN ASSHOLE.  This is really annoying.  Just say > `removed'. I didn't know that posting a tongue-in-cheek reply every once in a while translates to acting like an asshole. *shrugs* In my opinion, your bashing was totally uncalled fo

Re: [aur-general] Deletion Request

2011/7/22 Evangelos Foutras > On 22 July 2011 10:18, Kwpolska wrote: > > Please, don't act like AN ASSHOLE. This is really annoying. Just say > > `removed'. > > I didn't know that posting a tongue-in-cheek reply every once in a > while translates to acting like an asshole. *shrugs* > > In my o

Re: [aur-general] Deletion Request

On 22/07/11 17:33, Evangelos Foutras wrote: On 22 July 2011 10:18, Kwpolska wrote: Please, don't act like AN ASSHOLE. This is really annoying. Just say `removed'. I didn't know that posting a tongue-in-cheek reply every once in a while translates to acting like an asshole. *shrugs* In my o

Re: [aur-general] Deletion Request

On 22.7.2011 12:10, Allan McRae wrote: On 22/07/11 17:33, Evangelos Foutras wrote: On 22 July 2011 10:18, Kwpolska wrote: Please, don't act like AN ASSHOLE. This is really annoying. Just say `removed'. I didn't know that posting a tongue-in-cheek reply every once in a while translates to a

Re: [aur-general] Deletion Request

No one shall use curse words under my topic! (Shh, be nice to him, he is having his period.) On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Det wrote: > On 22.7.2011 12:10, Allan McRae wrote: > >> On 22/07/11 17:33, Evangelos Foutras wrote: >> >>> On 22 July 2011 10:18, Kwpolska wrote: >>> Please, don't

[aur-general] OK! changing a PKG's name and retaining votes/comments

I started a thread with same subject less the "OK! " back in May and am glad to see people saw some value in it to the point of modifying the AUR! Since the next version of the linux kernel is now released and likely soon to enter [testing] under a new name, I need to use this new feature to chang

[aur-general] Delete request

virtualbox-guest-modules-ck http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49288

Re: [aur-general] OK! changing a PKG's name and retaining votes/comments

Op 22-07-11 13:35, member graysky schreef: I started a thread with same subject less the "OK! " back in May and am glad to see people saw some value in it to the point of modifying the AUR! Since the next version of the linux kernel is now released and likely soon to enter [testing] under a new

Re: [aur-general] OK! changing a PKG's name and retaining votes/comments

On 22/07/11 22:40, Ike Devolder wrote: Op 22-07-11 13:35, member graysky schreef: I started a thread with same subject less the "OK! " back in May and am glad to see people saw some value in it to the point of modifying the AUR! Since the next version of the linux kernel is now released and like

Re: [aur-general] OK! changing a PKG's name and retaining votes/comments

On 07/22/2011 03:40 PM, Ike Devolder wrote: Op 22-07-11 13:35, member graysky schreef: I started a thread with same subject less the "OK! " back in May and am glad to see people saw some value in it to the point of modifying the AUR! Since the next version of the linux kernel is now released and

Re: [aur-general] OK! changing a PKG's name and retaining votes/comments

Op 22-07-11 14:55, Allan McRae schreef: On 22/07/11 22:40, Ike Devolder wrote: Op 22-07-11 13:35, member graysky schreef: I started a thread with same subject less the "OK! " back in May and am glad to see people saw some value in it to the point of modifying the AUR! Since the next version of

[aur-general] Request Deletion

Requesting deletion of Aur package console-setup: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50887, because of incompatibility with Arch.

Re: [aur-general] OK! changing a PKG's name and retaining votes/comments

The whole point of my post was NOT about what to call packages or to ignite a debate... it was about how to use the new functionality in the AUR to move/rename/whatever existing packages to newly named ones. To quote the relevant section of my original post: 1) What is the SOP for people to reque

Re: [aur-general] OK! changing a PKG's name and retaining votes/comments

On 07/22/2011 04:48 PM, member graysky wrote: The whole point of my post was NOT about what to call packages or to ignite a debate... it was about how to use the new functionality in the AUR to move/rename/whatever existing packages to newly named ones. To quote the relevant section of my origi

Re: [aur-general] OK! changing a PKG's name and retaining votes/comments

On 07/22/2011 04:48 PM, member graysky wrote: The whole point of my post was NOT about what to call packages or to ignite a debate... it was about how to use the new functionality in the AUR to move/rename/whatever existing packages to newly named ones. To quote the relevant section of my origi

Re: [aur-general] Delete request

On 07/22/2011 02:36 PM, member graysky wrote: virtualbox-guest-modules-ck http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49288 Why? -- cantabile "Jayne is a girl's name." -- River

Re: [aur-general] OK! changing a PKG's name and retaining votes/comments

On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 05:36:47PM +0300, cantabile wrote: > On 07/22/2011 04:48 PM, member graysky wrote: > >The whole point of my post was NOT about what to call packages or to > >ignite a debate... it was about how to use the new functionality in > >the AUR to move/rename/whatever existing packa

Re: [aur-general] OK! changing a PKG's name and retaining votes/comments

Crap... I thought it was a done deal :( On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:36 AM, cantabile wrote: > On 07/22/2011 04:48 PM, member graysky wrote: >> >> The whole point of my post was NOT about what to call packages or to >> ignite a debate... it was about how to use the new functionality in >> the AUR t

Re: [aur-general] Delete request

On 07/22/2011 04:37 PM, cantabile wrote: On 07/22/2011 02:36 PM, member graysky wrote: virtualbox-guest-modules-ck http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49288 Why? I would like to know the real reason too, you don't seem like the owner of the package and it seems actively maintained. --

Re: [aur-general] Delete request

On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Jelle van der Waa wrote: > On 07/22/2011 04:37 PM, cantabile wrote: > >> On 07/22/2011 02:36 PM, member graysky wrote: >> >>> virtualbox-guest-modules-ck >>> >>> http://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=49288 >>> >

Re: [aur-general] OK! changing a PKG's name and retaining votes/comments

On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:52:54AM -0400, member graysky wrote: > Crap... I thought it was a done deal :( This is still on my TODO list. I'll probably implement this once my development box is up again (it died some days ago). Further details should be discussed on aur-dev, please.

Re: [aur-general] Delete request

On 07/22/2011 05:23 PM, Cédric Girard wrote: On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Jelle van der Waa wrote: On 07/22/2011 04:37 PM, cantabile wrote: On 07/22/2011 02:36 PM, member graysky wrote: virtualbox-guest-modules-ck http://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=49288

[aur-general] remove kernel26-bede

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44336 why ? updated to linux-bede 3.0.0, see: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50914 thx

Re: [aur-general] remove kernel26-bede

On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 06:04:22PM +0200, Ike Devolder wrote: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44336 > > why ? updated to linux-bede 3.0.0, see: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50914 Done, thanks!

Re: [aur-general] Delete request

Sorry, this PKGBUILD is not right (too inefficient) and I would rather wait for the new linux-ck naming scheme to work on it. I can reupload the renamed version later on. 2011/7/22 Cédric Girard : > On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Jelle van der Waa wrote: > >> On 07/22/2011 04:37 PM, cantabile

[aur-general] delete mingw32-ssh2-static

mingw32-libssh2-static [1] and mingw32-ssh2-static [2] are the same. I think [2] should be deleted. Thanks. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28886 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28851

Re: [aur-general] delete mingw32-ssh2-static

On 22 July 2011 23:03, Joao Cordeiro wrote: > mingw32-libssh2-static [1] and mingw32-ssh2-static [2] are the same. I think > [2] should be deleted. I think both should be removed; they are from two years ago and have no votes or maintainer. Deleted only the second one for now.

[aur-general] Renaming a package

Hey guys, I decided to rename the package renoise to renoise-demo. "renoise" already has a few votes. Can one of you kind fellows transfer the votes to renoise-demo and remove renoise? Also, is there a way I can make the people with renoise installed upgrade to renoise-demo? Thanks! -Max

Re: [aur-general] Renaming a package

On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 08:16:17PM -0400, merp boop wrote: > Hey guys, > > I decided to rename the package renoise to renoise-demo. "renoise" already > has a few votes. Can one of you kind fellows transfer the votes to > renoise-demo and remove renoise? > > Also, is there a way I can make the p