Re: [aur-general] Securing the AUR website

2011-08-16 Thread KESHAV P.R.
Also please ensure aur-notify mails for package comments provide https links. Regards. Keshav

Re: [aur-general] Mass orphan all ghost1227 packages

2011-08-16 Thread Peter Lewis
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011, Justin Davis wrote: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34686 clyde-git Looks like this is no longer being developed :-( /me hopes someone pops up to prove him wrong...

Re: [aur-general] Mass orphan all ghost1227 packages

2011-08-16 Thread Karol Blazewicz
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Peter Lewis wrote: > On Mon, 15 Aug 2011, Justin Davis wrote: >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34686       clyde-git > > Looks like this is no longer being developed :-( > > /me hopes someone pops up to prove him wrong... > That's true, check clyde th

[aur-general] Delete firefox-firebug

2011-08-16 Thread Kevin Vesga
Please remove firefox-firebug[1] as it a duplicate of firefox-extension-firebug-stable[2] and its out-dated. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50889 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44809

Re: [aur-general] Delete firefox-firebug

2011-08-16 Thread Thomas S Hatch
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Kevin Vesga <31337h4c...@gmail.com> wrote: > Please remove firefox-firebug[1] as it a duplicate of > firefox-extension-firebug-stable[2] > and its out-dated. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50889 > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=448

Re: [aur-general] Delete firefox-firebug

2011-08-16 Thread speps
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 13:25:29 -0600 Thomas S Hatch wrote: > On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Kevin Vesga <31337h4c...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Please remove firefox-firebug[1] as it a duplicate of > > firefox-extension-firebug-stable[2] > > and its out-dated. > > > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/

Re: [aur-general] Delete firefox-firebug

2011-08-16 Thread Florian Pritz
On 16.08.2011 21:54, speps wrote: > On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 13:25:29 -0600 > Thomas S Hatch wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Kevin Vesga <31337h4c...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Please remove firefox-firebug[1] as it a duplicate of >> > firefox-extension-firebug-stable[2] >> > and its out-

[aur-general] Delete Request

2011-08-16 Thread speps
Hi, plowshare recently switched from svn to git plowshare-svn [1] can be deleted, since plowshare-git [2] replaces it [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31779 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51591 Thanks - speps -

Re: [aur-general] Delete firefox-firebug

2011-08-16 Thread Peter Lewis
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011, Florian Pritz wrote: > > If you agree with this, a firefox-firebug could be re-uploaded, replacing > > the actual firefox-extension-firebug-stable. > > I'd say go with it, but we should probably wait for at least one more > opinion on the matter. Sounds good to me; I'm all fo

Re: [aur-general] Delete firefox-firebug

2011-08-16 Thread speps
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 22:12:27 +0200 Florian Pritz wrote: > > I uploaded this time ago, cause I though firefox-firebug was a better > > naming, since noscript and adblock-plus extensions in [community] are > > firefox-noscript and firefox-adblock-plus respectively. > > You should have requested a

Re: [aur-general] Delete Request

2011-08-16 Thread Peter Lewis
Hi, On Tue, 16 Aug 2011, speps wrote: > Hi, plowshare recently switched from svn to git > > plowshare-svn [1] can be deleted, since > plowshare-git [2] replaces it > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31779 > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51591 Sounds good - but I j

Re: [aur-general] Delete firefox-firebug

2011-08-16 Thread speps
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 21:37:58 +0100 Peter Lewis wrote: > On Tue, 16 Aug 2011, Florian Pritz wrote: > > > If you agree with this, a firefox-firebug could be re-uploaded, replacing > > > the actual firefox-extension-firebug-stable. > > > > I'd say go with it, but we should probably wait for at leas

Re: [aur-general] Delete Request

2011-08-16 Thread Peter Lewis
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011, Peter Lewis wrote: > PS. cc'ing dserban Okay, I heard back from dserban. The SVN package has gone. Thanks speps. Pete.

[aur-general] Removal request kernel26-selinux

2011-08-16 Thread Nicky726
Hello, TUs, as the maintainer of kernel26-selinux [1] I ask for its removal, as it has been made obsolete by linux-selinux [2]. May this also serve as a notice to the users who do not subscribe to package comments. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32045 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/p

Re: [aur-general] Delete Request

2011-08-16 Thread speps
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 21:45:00 +0100 Peter Lewis wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 16 Aug 2011, speps wrote: > > Hi, plowshare recently switched from svn to git > > > > plowshare-svn [1] can be deleted, since > > plowshare-git [2] replaces it > > > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31779 >

Re: [aur-general] Delete Request

2011-08-16 Thread Peter Lewis
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011, speps wrote: > I already uploaded plowshare-git, cause I actually maintain plowshare, and > i'm used to follow its development, since the actual project leader release > a snapshot every 10~ days. Oh excellent, makes sense then. > Btw, you're right. I'll disown it, if dserba

Re: [aur-general] Removal request kernel26-selinux

2011-08-16 Thread Jakob Gruber
On 08/16/2011 11:01 PM, Nicky726 wrote: > Hello, TUs, as the maintainer of kernel26-selinux [1] I ask for its removal, > as it has been made obsolete by linux-selinux [2]. May this also serve as a > notice to the users who do not subscribe to package comments. > > [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/pac

[aur-general] Removal Request

2011-08-16 Thread gadget3000
freedoko-bin32 (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29644). It exists as freedoko (http://aur.archlinux.org/packagesreson.php?.php?ID=15705) and I can't find a reason for a 32-bit only version. No votes, no maintainer and out of date.

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request

2011-08-16 Thread Thomas Dziedzic
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 5:42 PM, gadget3000 wrote: > freedoko-bin32 (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29644). It exists > as freedoko > (http://aur.archlinux.org/packagesreson.php?.php?ID=15705) > and I can't find a reason for a 32-bit only

[aur-general] Deletion Request southerncross-git and mcabber duplicates

2011-08-16 Thread nem
good day. two weeks ago southerncross github was deleted due halt of development (see reference in [1]). it was orphaned upon and since then nobody came up with a mirror (even though removal was announced 6 weeks ago). so i guess 'southerncross-git' [2] is redundant for now and can be removed. [

Re: [aur-general] Deletion Request southerncross-git and mcabber duplicates

2011-08-16 Thread Brad Fanella
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 12:30 AM, nem wrote: > > good day. > > two weeks ago southerncross github was deleted due halt of development > (see reference in [1]). it was orphaned upon and since then nobody came > up with a mirror (even though removal was announced 6 weeks ago). so i > guess 'souther

Re: [aur-general] Securing the AUR website

2011-08-16 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 01:21:57PM +0530, KESHAV P.R. wrote: > Also please ensure aur-notify mails for package comments provide https links. That has been implemented for a long time [1]. [1] http://projects.archlinux.org/aur.git/commit/?id=973e4f85