Re: [aur-general] Removal requests: AUFS packages cleanup

2011-08-29 Thread Dave Reisner
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:00:07PM +0200, Calimero wrote: > Hello, > As of the release of AUFS3, these packages need to be removed (they > are orphaned, or mine): > > aufs2 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49766 > aufs2-all https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38249 > aufs2-ck htt

[aur-general] Removal requests: AUFS packages cleanup

2011-08-29 Thread Calimero
Hello, As of the release of AUFS3, these packages need to be removed (they are orphaned, or mine): aufs2 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49766 aufs2-all https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38249 aufs2-ck https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37345 aufs2-util https://aur.

Re: [aur-general] aurdupes 0.6 released

2011-08-29 Thread gadget3000
*Packages created to update others:* haskell-xmpp-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32418) was created to update haskell-xmpp ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30218) more quickly. The maintainer is happy for it to be deleted, as stated in the comments. hdate-applet-new (h

Re: [aur-general] Flashplugin Duplicates

2011-08-29 Thread Stefan Husmann
Am 29.08.2011 20:15, schrieb Axilleas P: The prerelease should be deleted in favor of beta, as stated by its maintainer. See comments in flashplugin-beta. Comment by: anish on Tue, 19 Jul 2011 18:57:37 + @renan_freitas None, but this package will eventually be deleted in favour of flas

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

2011-08-29 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 9:55 PM, Max Roder wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > I think fbsplash-uswsusp [1] should be deleted, as uswsusp-fbsplash [2] > provides the same and is up-to-date. Deleted, thanks. Also, please consider using PGP/MIME instead of putting

[aur-general] Removal request

2011-08-29 Thread Max Roder
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I think fbsplash-uswsusp [1] should be deleted, as uswsusp-fbsplash [2] provides the same and is up-to-date. Thanks, Max [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32300 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16233 -BEGIN PGP SIGNAT

Re: [aur-general] request to disown pyython26

2011-08-29 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 9:20 PM, Rémy Oudompheng wrote: > Hello, > > I notice python26 has remained unattended for a year or so and despite > comments from angry users and me sending an email to the maintainer > last week no change has been done. Can a TU disown it? Disowned. :)

[aur-general] request to disown pyython26

2011-08-29 Thread Rémy Oudompheng
Hello, I notice python26 has remained unattended for a year or so and despite comments from angry users and me sending an email to the maintainer last week no change has been done. Can a TU disown it? http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41809 Thank you. Rémy.

Re: [aur-general] Flashplugin Duplicates

2011-08-29 Thread Axilleas P
The prerelease should be deleted in favor of beta, as stated by its maintainer. See comments in flashplugin-beta. Comment by: anish on Tue, 19 Jul 2011 18:57:37 + @renan_freitas None, but this package will eventually be deleted in favour of flashplugin-beta Comment by: renan_freitas on T

[aur-general] Flashplugin Duplicates

2011-08-29 Thread Antonio Lucas
I was looking for some plugin that works in my machine and found these identical packages These two have basically the same PKGBUILD except for one line (a license file that is installed) flashplugin-prerelease http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32072 flashplugin-beta http://aur.archlinux.o

Re: [aur-general] aurdupes 0.6 released

2011-08-29 Thread Stefan Husmann
Am 29.08.2011 13:13, schrieb gadget3000: *Packages created to update others:* dar-newest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51785) wanted to update dar [community] more quickly. It has been abandonded and only has 1 vote. deja-dup-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35144) has

Re: [aur-general] Deletion Requests

2011-08-29 Thread Heiko Baums
Am Mon, 29 Aug 2011 12:49:04 +0100 schrieb gadget3000 : > Ah, I thought it was 20 votes but with a bit of wiki searching that > was apparently an old minimum. I usually quote the votes because > "Votes are an indicator of package interest or usage." Not necessarily. The votes don't need to mean s

Re: [aur-general] Deletion Requests

2011-08-29 Thread Cédric Girard
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 1:49 PM, gadget3000 wrote: > Ah, I thought it was 20 votes but with a bit of wiki searching that was > apparently an old minimum. I usually quote the votes because "Votes are an > indicator of package interest or usage." (Source: > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Comm

Re: [aur-general] Deletion Requests

2011-08-29 Thread gadget3000
> > One other thing. The votes are meant for having a package moved to > [community] and not for having it kept in AUR. The minimum of required > votes are 10 as far as I know. So a package with 7 votes is not that > far away from that. Ah, I thought it was 20 votes but with a bit of wiki searchi

Re: [aur-general] Deletion Requests

2011-08-29 Thread Heiko Baums
Am Mon, 29 Aug 2011 11:59:06 +0100 schrieb gadget3000 : > I don't think I flagged either package out of date but either way > thanks for letting me know about old projects. I'm still a bit of a > noob here :P I don't know who has flagged this package as out-of-date, but it was. So I mentioned it.

Re: [aur-general] aurdupes 0.6 released

2011-08-29 Thread gadget3000
*Packages created to update others:* dar-newest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51785) wanted to update dar [community] more quickly. It has been abandonded and only has 1 vote. deja-dup-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35144) has similar intentions for deja-dup (https://au

Re: [aur-general] Deletion Requests

2011-08-29 Thread gadget3000
I don't think I flagged either package out of date but either way thanks for letting me know about old projects. I'm still a bit of a noob here :P I do have a question though. What if it's an old multiplayer only project? I nobody plays it, nobody will want to use it. Gadget3000 On 29 August 20

Re: [aur-general] Deletion Requests

2011-08-29 Thread Stefan Husmann
Am 29.08.2011 11:59, schrieb gadget3000: dwarffortress-graphics (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38076) has been replaced by dwarffortress-mayday ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43936) clickosquare (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43425) - Dead project since 2002.

Re: [aur-general] Deletion Requests

2011-08-29 Thread Heiko Baums
Am Mon, 29 Aug 2011 12:28:50 +0200 schrieb Heiko Baums : > Am Mon, 29 Aug 2011 10:59:32 +0100 > schrieb gadget3000 : > > > clickosquare > > (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43425) - Dead project > > since 2002. No maintainer and only 7 votes. > > Actually I'm not a TU and don't know th

Re: [aur-general] Deletion Requests

2011-08-29 Thread Heiko Baums
Am Mon, 29 Aug 2011 10:59:32 +0100 schrieb gadget3000 : > clickosquare > (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43425) - Dead project > since 2002. No maintainer and only 7 votes. Actually I'm not a TU and don't know this package, but I think as long as it works there's no need to remove it j

Re: [aur-general] Deletion Requests

2011-08-29 Thread gadget3000
dwarffortress-graphics (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38076) has been replaced by dwarffortress-mayday ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43936) clickosquare (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43425) - Dead project since 2002. No maintainer and only 7 votes. Gadget3000