This package[1] is orphaned and broken. The upstream code does not work
in archlinux without patch.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23733
Hi guys
Lmms has been out of date for quite a while. It's been flagged out of date on
June 13th. I emailed the maintainer Mateusz Herych telling him that only the
pkgver and checksums have to be updated. He answered, that he's too busy in
real life to take care of it.
I don't know if this
Uli Armbruster uli.armbrus...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi guys
Lmms has been out of date for quite a while. It's been flagged out of date on
June 13th. I emailed the maintainer Mateusz Herych telling him that only the
pkgver and checksums have to be updated. He answered, that he's too busy in
On 7 September 2011 17:18, Uli Armbruster uli.armbrus...@googlemail.com wrote:
Lmms has been out of date for quite a while. It's been flagged out of date on
June 13th.
I emailed the maintainer Mateusz Herych telling him that only the pkgver and
checksums
have to be updated. He answered,
On 7 September 2011 19:48, Sven-Hendrik Haase s...@lutzhaase.com wrote:
Actually updating doesn't seem so straight forward as compilation for the most
recent version breaks.
That's because it was never built in a chroot before, and those
optdeps need to be makedeps as well. Either that, or
On 7 September 2011 10:02, Jekyll Wu adap...@gmail.com wrote:
ttf-ubuntu-font-family[1] and ttf-ubuntu[2] are essentially the same, except
that the latter provides an outdated version.
Please merge [2] into [1].
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41465
[2]
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 08:01:31PM -0700, Anish Bhatt wrote:
Can I request that some sort of system be put in place for informing
maintainers that their package is being deleted ? I was afk for a week or so
and I come back to a deleted package. While that was the eventual idea, I
had a close
Hi,
I'd like to request removing kernel26-xen[1] and saving all votes/comments
into linux-xen[2].
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16087
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51622
--
Krzysztof Raczkowski
racz...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
On 7 September 2011 14:46, Krzysztof Raczkowski racz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to request removing kernel26-xen[1] and saving all votes/comments
into linux-xen[2].
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16087
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51622
--
Krzysztof
On Wed, 07 Sep 2011, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
I usually drop a comment before removing a package, so that at least all
users on the notification list get informed. In case of doubt, you can
almost always check aur-general.
Yeah, this is a really good idea IMO.
Pete.
Each one for non existant upstream
logitech_applet https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=2074
archfoster https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=1935
mpcstick https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12754
On 09/07/2011 05:19 PM, Luca Bennati wrote:
Each one for non existant upstream
logitech_applet https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=2074
archfoster https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=1935
mpcstick https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12754
removed
--
Jelle van der Waa
Sadly they weren't merged in this case :(
Infact, I didn't even know there was support for such a thing. While I would
have loved merged votes comments, I'm more concerned about the users left
in the dark. Would implementing a replaces functionality for aur similar
to the repos be a big hassle ?
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 8:06 PM, Anish Bhatt an...@archlinux.us wrote:
Sadly they weren't merged in this case :(
Infact, I didn't even know there was support for such a thing. While I would
have loved merged votes comments, I'm more concerned about the users left
in the dark. Would
Please remove this package:
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49444
I created new one with different name.
Thanks
--
On Wednesday, September 07, 2011 08:28:56 PM OK wrote:
Please remove this package:
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49444
I created new one with different name.
Done
--
Andrea
On Wed, 07 Sep 2011, Andrea Scarpino wrote:
On Wednesday, September 07, 2011 08:28:56 PM OK wrote:
Please remove this package:
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49444
I created new one with different name.
Done
Can we include package names on removal request emails please? This
On Wednesday, September 07, 2011 07:46:15 PM Peter Lewis wrote:
Can we include package names on removal request emails please? This thread
is kinda useless in the archive and I don't know if package ID 49444 was
one that I was using... :-/
You're right. He didn't and I forgot to write it too.
On 7 September 2011 11:05, Jekyll Wu adap...@gmail.com wrote:
This package[1] is orphaned and broken. The upstream code does not work in
archlinux without patch.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23733
I don't think it should be deleted. The upstream is still active
(they've
On Wed, 07 Sep 2011, Andrea Scarpino wrote:
On Wednesday, September 07, 2011 07:46:15 PM Peter Lewis wrote:
Can we include package names on removal request emails please? This thread
is kinda useless in the archive and I don't know if package ID 49444 was
one that I was using... :-/
* Sven-Hendrik Haase s...@lutzhaase.com [07.09.2011 13:48]:
Actually updating doesn't seem so straight forward as compilation for the
most recent version breaks. I will try further when I get home. I wouldn't
mind co-maintaining the package either. That might take some work off Mateusz.
--
Please remove packages mpy and mpy-git. Due to name conflict on PyPI, they
have been renamed as ncmpy and ncmpy-git. Thanks!
--
Cyker Way
E-mail: cyker...@gmail.com
http://www.cykerway.com
Please remove mpy and mpy-git. Due to name conflicts on PyPI, they have been
renamed as ncmpy and ncmpy-git. Thanks!
--
Cyker Way
E-mail: cyker...@gmail.com
http://www.cykerway.com
23 matches
Mail list logo
