Done.
--
Bartłomiej Piotrowski
Arch Linux Trusted User
http://archlinux.org/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
After flagging out-of-date the package 'ace' and contacting the
maintainer without a response, I created my own package 'libace' in a
desesperate way to help others.
Few months passed.
Yesterday I noticed the maintainer came back to orphan his package, so I
adopted it.
I'm now the maintainer
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Jonathan Wilson wrote:
> The packages android-2.2 and android-2.3 are both maintained by Figo.zhang
> and have been obsolete for many months. I emailed the dev about 6 weeks
> ago, and received no response. Please orphan the packages, and I will pick
> them up and
The packages android-2.2 and android-2.3 are both maintained by Figo.zhang
and have been obsolete for many months. I emailed the dev about 6 weeks
ago, and received no response. Please orphan the packages, and I will pick
them up and maintain them.
Thanks.
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 01:55:32AM -0200, rafael ff1 wrote:
> Can't access neither ping AUR web page. Is it down?
>
> $ ping aur.archlinux.org
> PING aur.archlinux.org (208.92.232.29) 56(84) bytes of data.
> ^C
> --- aur.archlinux.org ping statistics ---
> 62 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100%
Can't access neither ping AUR web page. Is it down?
$ ping aur.archlinux.org
PING aur.archlinux.org (208.92.232.29) 56(84) bytes of data.
^C
--- aur.archlinux.org ping statistics ---
62 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 61011ms
Sergei Lebedev wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can you please remove `ulex` [1] package, since it was renamed to
> `ocaml-ulex` [2], which follows OCaml Packaging Guidelines [3]?
>
> Thanks,
> Sergei
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42617
> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=555
Hello,
Can you please remove `ulex` [1] package, since it was renamed to
`ocaml-ulex` [2], which follows OCaml Packaging Guidelines [3]?
Thanks,
Sergei
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42617
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55537
[3] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php
On 4 January 2012 08:23, Eduardo Martins Lopes wrote:
> Actually the question regarding the names is about creating an aur package
> with the same name of the orphaned ones since the aur is where i can
> maintain those packages.
Oh no you can't do that. You have to use a different name. For
packa
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 2 fully signed off packages
* 12 packages missing signoffs
* 5 packages older than 14 days
10 matches
Mail list logo