Re: [aur-general] Removal request - libace

2012-01-04 Thread Bartłomiej Piotrowski
Done. -- Bartłomiej Piotrowski Arch Linux Trusted User http://archlinux.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[aur-general] Removal request - libace

2012-01-04 Thread Alex Belanger
After flagging out-of-date the package 'ace' and contacting the maintainer without a response, I created my own package 'libace' in a desesperate way to help others. Few months passed. Yesterday I noticed the maintainer came back to orphan his package, so I adopted it. I'm now the maintainer

Re: [aur-general] Orphan request - android-2.2, android-2.3

2012-01-04 Thread Thomas Dziedzic
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Jonathan Wilson wrote: > The packages android-2.2 and android-2.3 are both maintained by Figo.zhang > and have been obsolete for many months. I emailed the dev about 6 weeks > ago, and received no response. Please orphan the packages, and I will pick > them up and

[aur-general] Orphan request - android-2.2, android-2.3

2012-01-04 Thread Jonathan Wilson
The packages android-2.2 and android-2.3 are both maintained by Figo.zhang and have been obsolete for many months. I emailed the dev about 6 weeks ago, and received no response. Please orphan the packages, and I will pick them up and maintain them. Thanks.

Re: [aur-general] AUR site down?

2012-01-04 Thread Dave Reisner
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 01:55:32AM -0200, rafael ff1 wrote: > Can't access neither ping AUR web page. Is it down? > > $ ping aur.archlinux.org > PING aur.archlinux.org (208.92.232.29) 56(84) bytes of data. > ^C > --- aur.archlinux.org ping statistics --- > 62 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100%

[aur-general] AUR site down?

2012-01-04 Thread rafael ff1
Can't access neither ping AUR web page. Is it down? $ ping aur.archlinux.org PING aur.archlinux.org (208.92.232.29) 56(84) bytes of data. ^C --- aur.archlinux.org ping statistics --- 62 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 61011ms

Re: [aur-general] Remove `ulex`

2012-01-04 Thread Xyne
Sergei Lebedev wrote: > Hello, > > Can you please remove `ulex` [1] package, since it was renamed to > `ocaml-ulex` [2], which follows OCaml Packaging Guidelines [3]? > > Thanks, > Sergei > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42617 > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=555

[aur-general] Remove `ulex`

2012-01-04 Thread Sergei Lebedev
Hello, Can you please remove `ulex` [1] package, since it was renamed to `ocaml-ulex` [2], which follows OCaml Packaging Guidelines [3]? Thanks, Sergei [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42617 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55537 [3] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php

Re: [aur-general] orphaned community packages (intel-tbb, arpack, libmatio, xml-rpc and aspell-pt)

2012-01-04 Thread Ray Rashif
On 4 January 2012 08:23, Eduardo Martins Lopes wrote: > Actually the question regarding the names is about creating an aur package > with the same name of the orphaned ones since the aur is where i can > maintain those packages. Oh no you can't do that. You have to use a different name. For packa

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

2012-01-04 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 2 fully signed off packages * 12 packages missing signoffs * 5 packages older than 14 days