[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

2012-02-14 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 3 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days

Re: [aur-general] disowning a couple of packages

2012-02-14 Thread Peter Lewis
On Monday 13 Feb 2012 19:03:55 Thomas Dziedzic wrote: > >> If you plan on adopting sage-mathematics, you should know that it is > >> currently unbuildable on archlinux, and some other newer distros due > >> to how it is built. > >> It is currently out of date, and you wont be able to update it with

Re: [aur-general] disowning a couple of packages

2012-02-14 Thread Thomas Dziedzic
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 6:40 AM, Peter Lewis wrote: > On Monday 13 Feb 2012 19:03:55 Thomas Dziedzic wrote: >> >> If you plan on adopting sage-mathematics, you should know that it is >> >> currently unbuildable on archlinux, and some other newer distros due >> >> to how it is built. >> >> It is cu

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request

2012-02-14 Thread Alexander Rødseth
Hi, The packages were both useless, one was an orphan and both homepages were dead. Thanks for reporting and for including links to the packages. Their bits are all flipped and their bytes are erased. Never again shall they see light of day. Completely removed and blown away. This was the last ti

[aur-general] Removal request: aurorasim-git and tao-framework

2012-02-14 Thread Schala Zeal
Please delete 'aurorasim-git' and 'tao-framework' AUR packages These packages are two of my mistakes. The first one, aurorasim-git, was submitted when I was still a newbie last summer and it was not tested before submission. Even after testing it a while later, it's broken and the Aurora-Sim proje

[aur-general] Adopt/orphan request: mingw32-gettext

2012-02-14 Thread Schala Zeal
I would like to request mingw32-gettext be orphaned. The provided email address of the maintainer seems to be no longer valid, as sending a notice to him resulted in a failure delivery notice in my inbox, and mingw32-gettext, although up to date, is in need of PKGBUILD tweaking because the current

[aur-general] Remove request:airdrop-ng, airgraph-ng and aircrack-ptw

2012-02-14 Thread Techlive Zheng
airdrop-ng and airgraph-ng is duplicated with aircrack-ng-scripts in community. aircrack-ptw has been included into aircrack-ng since version 0.9, and the source link in PKGBUILD has down. airdrop-ng:https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41584 airgraph-ng:https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.ph

[aur-general] Merge Request: aircrack-ng-cuda to aircrack-ng-cuda-svn

2012-02-14 Thread Techlive Zheng
aircrack-ng-cuda is acctually a svn package, so I rename it to aircrack-ng-cuda-svn and uploaded, please merge aircrack-ng-cuda to aircrack-ng-cuda-svn. aircrack-ng-cuda:https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30958 aircrack-ng-cuda-svn:https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56686

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request

2012-02-14 Thread Bartłomiej Piotrowski
On 02/14/2012 09:52 PM, Alexander Rødseth wrote: > Their bits are all flipped and their bytes are erased. > Never again shall they see light of day. > Completely removed and blown away. > This was the last time their steps were retraced. > To the AUR basement, they are now chased. > I'm worried a

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request

2012-02-14 Thread Alexander Rødseth
Don't worry :) - Alexander

Re: [aur-general] Merge Request: aircrack-ng-cuda to aircrack-ng-cuda-svn

2012-02-14 Thread Alexander Rødseth
Hi, Ok, deleted+merged. Thanks. -- Cordially,  Alexander Rødseth  Arch Linux Trusted User  (xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)