=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 4 packages missing signoffs
* 2 packages older than 14 days
On 25 February 2012 21:45, 小龙 陈 chillermillerl...@hotmail.com wrote:
Could someone please orphan the hdapsd package in the AUR?I've added multiple
hard drive support and systemd support topackage and would like to adopt it.
It has not been updated for2 years by the current maintainer.
Link
Hi folks,
Could you delete viewnior-wp (1), because wallpaper support is now enabled
by default, thus, this package is outdated and is a clone of community/viewnior
(2).
1 : https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52709
2 : https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/viewnior/
--
Yes, I've sent an email about two months ago, but never received a reply.
Xiao-Long Chen
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:48:57 +0100
From: l.jirkov...@gmail.com
To: aur-general@archlinux.org
Subject: Re: [aur-general] Please orphan hdapsd
On 25 February 2012 21:45, 小龙 陈
Hi,
Disowned. Thanks.
--
Cordially,
Alexander Rødseth
Arch Linux Trusted User
(xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)
Hi!
python-vatnumber is Hopelessly outdated (0.5 while current is 1.0),
orphaned and depends on python2, so I submitted it as python2-vatnumber for
easier recognition
Thanks!
Luis
Hi
Could you delete python-waf-svn
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48189
Reason, waf moved to git as announced in one comment.
Thank you.
Cheers,
--
François Boulogne.
https://www.sciunto.org
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Luis von Bernus
luisvonber...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi!
python-vatnumber is Hopelessly outdated (0.5 while current is 1.0),
orphaned and depends on python2, so I submitted it as python2-vatnumber for
easier recognition
Thanks!
Luis
Hopelessly... It was
Browse to: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50911
Here is what I show for required by package... why are some of these
doubled? Required by broadcom-wl-ck broadcom-wl-ck lirc-ck lirc-ck
nvidia-275xx-ck nvidia-275xx-ck nvidia-beta-ck nvidia-ck nvidia-ck r8168-ck
r8168-ck vhba-module-ck
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 08:38:07PM +0100, Luis von Bernus wrote:
Birkengraben 38 | 96052 Bamberg | Tel.: +49 (0) 951 / 12 09 111
whoa!
you are aware that your address is in your email signature?
cheers!
mar77i
On 28 February 2012 12:07, member graysky gray...@archlinux.us wrote:
Here is what I show for required by package... why are some of these
doubled?
By the looks of it, because broadcom-wl-ck depends on it twice; once to
specify minimum version, once to specify maximum version.
AUR should
Yes, I am. It wasn't intended for here, but as long as I use my real
name, anyone with access to google can find it anyway.
On 28.02.2012 02:12, Martti Kühne wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 08:38:07PM +0100, Luis von Bernus wrote:
Birkengraben 38 | 96052 Bamberg | Tel.: +49 (0) 951 /
12 matches
Mail list logo
