=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 28 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 75 packages missing signoffs
* 2 packages older than 14 day
Hi,
the packages gill-sans-font and ttf-gill-sans provide the same font. It
would make sense to delete one.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=9843
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18570
Cheers
Simon
PS: Please CC responses.
On Sat, 03 Mar 2012, Simon Legner wrote:
> the packages gill-sans-font and ttf-gill-sans provide the same font. It
> would make sense to delete one.
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=9843
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18570
Merged. Thanks for the reminder, I meant to do
On 3 March 2012 11:38, Balló György wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for the question.
>
>> I looked at your AUR packages and saw that you are maintaining the
>> unity desktop. I never used this desktop environment, but as a
>> curiosity is it something you want to eventually bring into [community] ?
>
> I
2012/3/2 Angel Velásquez :
> Hi Ike!
>
> I didn't get you by your name but by your nickname, oh yeah, as Allan
> said I had a good memory about you, so this is good ;).
I've seen the nickname around as well, but not sure about what really.
But that should be good after looking at a couple PKGBUILD
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote:
> Is there a separate repo? Do you intend to start one otherwise? I
> would really like to see unity accessible for Arch users.
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Unity ?
Ike Devolder wrote:
/snip
> [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?SeB=m&L=2&K=BlackIkeEagle
Hi Ike,
I too think that your PKGBUILDs look good. They're clean and well-structured.
The only issue I see is the lack of variable quoting, e.g. I've seen this is
many of them:
make DESTDIR=${pkgdir
> Is there a separate repo? Do you intend to start one otherwise? I
> would really like to see unity accessible for Arch users.
Unity 2D is available in my [ayatana] repo[1] along with indicators. To
provide x86_64 packages, I'll need a build server.
Unity is a more difficult task, because it de
On 03/03/2012 04:15 PM, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote:
> On 3 March 2012 11:38, Balló György wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> thanks for the question.
>>
>>> I looked at your AUR packages and saw that you are maintaining the
>>> unity desktop. I never used this desktop environment, but as a
>>> curiosity is it somet
I have finally moved the new ghc to arch repos.
With this cleanup comes a bit of change.
The decision has been made that ghc will be updated to the latest
stable version and haskell-platform will be moved to the aur.
This means you should remove the haskell-platform related packages
before updatin
Hi György,
I think you would be an awesome addition to the TU team. Your Unity
packages are very good (and saved me a lot of work from repackaging
everything :D).
Since you mentioned the patched Xorg server and compiz, I'd just like to
point out that the patched Xorg patches are no longer needed
Hi Xyne,
this is the noop listening your conversations ...
>
> I too think that your PKGBUILDs look good. They're clean and
> well-structured. The only issue I see is the lack of variable
> quoting, e.g. I've seen this is many of them:
>
> make DESTDIR=${pkgdir} install
>
> That will not work
On 03.03.2012 21:02, Bjoern Lindig wrote:
> Hi Xyne,
>
> this is the noop listening your conversations ...
>>
>> I too think that your PKGBUILDs look good. They're clean and
>> well-structured. The only issue I see is the lack of variable
>> quoting, e.g. I've seen this is many of them:
>>
>> m
this package
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55495
and this one
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20371
as they are both python2 and exist here
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52696
and here
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57243
Thank you,
Daniel
On 17 November 2011 21:09, Final Crisis wrote:
>
> The following aur packages I made some time ago have been obsolete and the
> source files non-existent for a very long time and should be removed:
> grub2-theme-aftermathblue, grub2-theme-archsphere, grub2-theme-distroballs,
> grub2-theme-elegan
On 04/03/12 06:02, Bjoern Lindig wrote:
> Hi Xyne,
>
> this is the noop listening your conversations ...
>>
>> I too think that your PKGBUILDs look good. They're clean and
>> well-structured. The only issue I see is the lack of variable
>> quoting, e.g. I've seen this is many of them:
>>
>> make
On 4 March 2012 00:12, Ionut Biru wrote:
> Unity is only a Canonical project, not a project that can be used by anyone.
It's just about accessibility, so as to not deprive anyone and allow
no-one to say "there is no foo in Arch" :D
But I guess if it's that much PITA then it should be forgotten a
lib32-libnl [1] is out-of-date for some time now and fails to build.
Sent email to the maintainer, but he didn't replay. By the way, all
his packages are out-of-date.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36007
Please disown lib32-libnl.
Thanks
On 04/03/12 07:00, rafael ff1 wrote:
> lib32-libnl [1] is out-of-date for some time now and fails to build.
> Sent email to the maintainer, but he didn't replay. By the way, all
> his packages are out-of-date.
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36007
>
> Please disown lib32-libnl.
>
>
19 matches
Mail list logo
