Hi,
after my own application and seeing it again i would like to propose an update
to the TU Bylaws giving more information that the application should be gpg
signed with the addidional publication of the public key.
This would also imply we can remove the eleventh point of:
Agreed; it's nice to have a single centralized document that delineates the
procedure. I don't think that we should remove the eleventh point of
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/New_AUR_TU_guidelines#TODO_list_for_new_Trusted_Users
however as it is perfectly conceivable for a TU to use a
How's this? The author of this signed message and the person who
uploaded the key fingerprint to
http://demohack.sourceforge.net/contact.html and
http://mebitag.sourceforge.net/contact.html solemnly swears that he
wrote the TU application that was just sent and hopes that you do not
think less of
Op donderdag 12 april 2012 21:16:51 schreef Andre Osku Schmidt:
hi,
i think puredata package can be deleted from aur
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44768
cause that package is orphaned and theres a package named pd (like
upstream tarball, fwiw)
On 13/04/12 17:51, Connor Behan wrote:
How's this? The author of this signed message and the person who
uploaded the key fingerprint to
http://demohack.sourceforge.net/contact.html and
http://mebitag.sourceforge.net/contact.html solemnly swears that he
wrote the TU application that was just
Op vrijdag 13 april 2012 18:00:08 schreef Allan McRae:
On 13/04/12 17:51, Connor Behan wrote:
How's this? The author of this signed message and the person who
uploaded the key fingerprint to
http://demohack.sourceforge.net/contact.html and
http://mebitag.sourceforge.net/contact.html
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 1 new package in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 66 packages missing signoffs
* 5 packages older than 14 days
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 3:43 AM, Kaiting Chen kaitocr...@gmail.com wrote:
Agreed; it's nice to have a single centralized document that delineates
the procedure. I don't think that we should remove the eleventh point of
Compiz is no longer developed in git, but rather in bzr.
There are several compiz-*-git packages that should be merged into the
new compiz-*-bzr packages:
I don't think comments are generally relevant, so I don't think they
need to be merged.
compiz-core-git 20110827-1 - compiz-core-bzr 3091-1
Op woensdag 11 april 2012 23:57:33 schreef Hugo Osvaldo Barrera:
The following are firefox betas/alphas/braches/localizations/PGOs builds
that are seriously out of date, and extremely redundant (we have
*plenty* of up-to-date firefox beta/dev packages).
All these versions are at least 3
On 13.04.2012 09:38, Ike Devolder wrote:
This would also imply we can remove the eleventh point of:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/New_AUR_TU_guidelines#TODO_list_for_new_Trusted_Users
Don't remove it, but replace it with something like Get your/a GPG key
signed by the master keys.
Op vrijdag 13 april 2012 13:30:23 schreef Florian Pritz:
On 13.04.2012 09:38, Ike Devolder wrote:
This would also imply we can remove the eleventh point of:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/New_AUR_TU_guidelines#TODO_list_for_n
ew_Trusted_Users
Don't remove it, but replace it with
Hi,
Obliterated, thank you.
--
Cordially,
Alexander Rødseth
Arch Linux Trusted User
(xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)
Hi, I noticed that you orphaned the vegastrike games. May I know the
reason? I might be willing to take over, if it's worth it, upstream seems
to be active.
Thanks
SanskritFritz
SanskritFritz sanskritfr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I noticed that you orphaned the vegastrike games. May I know the
reason? I might be willing to take over, if it's worth it, upstream seems
to be active.
Thanks
SanskritFritz
I don't use the package and didn't want to update it. Also upstream is
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Sven-Hendrik Haase s...@lutzhaase.comwrote:
SanskritFritz sanskritfr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I noticed that you orphaned the vegastrike games. May I know the
reason? I might be willing to take over, if it's worth it, upstream seems
to be active.
Thanks
SanskritFritz sanskritfr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Sven-Hendrik Haase s...@lutzhaase.comwrote:
SanskritFritz sanskritfr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I noticed that you orphaned the vegastrike games. May I know the
reason? I might be willing to take over, if it's worth
On 13/04/12 04:16 AM, Ike Devolder wrote:
Op vrijdag 13 april 2012 18:00:08 schreef Allan McRae:
On 13/04/12 17:51, Connor Behan wrote:
How's this? The author of this signed message and the person who
uploaded the key fingerprint to
http://demohack.sourceforge.net/contact.html and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The maintainer has created deepin-screenshot-git[1] to replace
deepin-scrot-git[2], which follows the renaming of the upstream.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57793
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55299
It will be great if you'll start using mail client with threading support.
--
Bartłomiej Piotrowski
Arch Linux Trusted User
http://archlinux.org/
20 matches
Mail list logo
