Re: [aur-general] AUR JDK-package cleanup

2012-05-18 Thread Alexander Rødseth
Hello, Thanks for reporting and for including all the links. I removed the first 6 packages and merged+deleted bin32-jdk to lib32-jdk. lib32-jdk has been out of date since 28 Aug 2011 and was disowned. If there are packages that could have better names, one possible approach is adding a comment a

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: fenics group packages

2012-05-18 Thread speps
On Fri, 18 May 2012 22:29:50 +0100 Myles English wrote: > >> On Fri, 18 May 2012 14:54:27 -0300, rafael ff1 said: > > > 2012/5/18 Myles English : > >> > >>  >> (The instant package migrated to instan-bzr because the source > package > >>  >> name was too long to call it instant-bzr.) >

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: fenics group packages

2012-05-18 Thread Myles English
>> On Fri, 18 May 2012 14:54:27 -0300, rafael ff1 said: > 2012/5/18 Myles English : >> >>  >> (The instant package migrated to instan-bzr because the source package >>  >> name was too long to call it instant-bzr.) >>  > What do you mean too long? If I'm not totally mistaken we don't ha

[aur-general] AUR JDK-package cleanup

2012-05-18 Thread Jesse Juhani Jaara
Following jde/jre packages should be removed: [1]lib32-jdk-6u17: orhapn, Provides a static and old version of Oracles JDK, a lib32 package for Oracle JDK6 exists. [2]jdk-community-stable-x32: Non functional (ties to pull the Oracle JDK from ftp.archlinux.org), "out-of-date", serves no real purpose

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: fenics group packages

2012-05-18 Thread rafael ff1
2012/5/18 Myles English : > >  >> (The instant package migrated to instan-bzr because the source package >  >> name was too long to call it instant-bzr.) >  > What do you mean too long? If I'm not totally mistaken we don't have any >  > kind of file name length limitations. > > When I uploaded, doi

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: fenics group packages

2012-05-18 Thread Jesse Juhani Jaara
pe, 2012-05-18 kello 17:58 +0100, Myles English kirjoitti: > $ aurup instant-bzr-332-1-any.pkg.tar.xz science > > there was a message saying something like the name was too long and it > has to be less than twenty something characters, so I shortened > 'instant' to 'instan'. If that is so, I would

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: fenics group packages

2012-05-18 Thread Myles English
> pe, 2012-05-18 kello 15:06 +0100, Myles English kirjoitti: >> Please would a TU delete them and transfer the votes to the *-bzr >> versions that I have replaced them with. > You should provide URLs for each one. Here are the URLs: Delete

Re: [aur-general] Disown request: tal-plugins

2012-05-18 Thread Seblu
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Frankie Robertson wrote: > Hi, > > The package [tal-plugins](https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44426) > is out of date and doesn't build at the moment. Unfortunately I > couldn't contact the maintainer since they haven't provided a valid > email address. If

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: fenics group packages

2012-05-18 Thread speps
On Fri, 18 May 2012 15:06:57 +0100 Myles English wrote: > > Hi, > > I was maintaining these packages: > > dolfin > ffc > fiat > instant > ufc > ufl > viper > > Please would a TU delete them and transfer the votes to the *-bzr > versions that I have replaced them with. > > I orphaned the pack

[aur-general] Disown request: tal-plugins

2012-05-18 Thread Frankie Robertson
Hi, The package [tal-plugins](https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44426) is out of date and doesn't build at the moment. Unfortunately I couldn't contact the maintainer since they haven't provided a valid email address. If it's disowned I can update it with a working package. Thanks, Franki

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: fenics group packages

2012-05-18 Thread Jesse Juhani Jaara
pe, 2012-05-18 kello 15:06 +0100, Myles English kirjoitti: > Please would a TU delete them and transfer the votes to the *-bzr > versions that I have replaced them with. You should provide URLs for each one. > (The instant package migrated to instan-bzr because the source package > name was too lo

[aur-general] Removal request: fenics group packages

2012-05-18 Thread Myles English
Hi, I was maintaining these packages: dolfin ffc fiat instant ufc ufl viper Please would a TU delete them and transfer the votes to the *-bzr versions that I have replaced them with. I orphaned the packages over a week ago and gave one week's notice in a comment on each page that they would be

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

2012-05-18 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 3 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days