=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 10 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14
Please, rename gtk-thinice-engine to gtk-engine-thinice
I believe it is more appropriate
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Vinycius Maia suport...@uol.com.br wrote:
Please, rename gtk-thinice-engine to gtk-engine-thinice
I believe it is more appropriate
You should upload a new package with the new name and then request a merge here.
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Vinycius Maia suport...@uol.com.br wrote:
I have sent
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2012 12:54:58 +0200
From: massimiliano.torro...@gmail.com
To: aur-general@archlinux.org
Subject: Re: [aur-general] [Rename Request] gtk-thinice-engine
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 12:42 PM,
The upcoming LibreOffice 3.6.x drops the dependency on (java) lucene
2.9.x. We can drop java lucene from our repos if nobody
else wants to take over the maintainership of java lucene in the future.
I'd like to bring in clucene from community and fix a missing feature.
But I'm not familiar with
hej!
there are two old packages ([1],[2]) of musca which are bugged and outdated due
to
dmenu (see comments), both orphaned for some time. musca [3] includes those
patches
so there's no need for [1] and [2] anymore.
regards,
nem
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44862
[2]
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 4:14 PM, n...@ikitten.co.uk wrote:
hej!
there are two old packages ([1],[2]) of musca which are bugged and outdated
due to
dmenu (see comments), both orphaned for some time. musca [3] includes those
patches
so there's no need for [1] and [2] anymore.
regards,
hej!
i provided mantis-wm [1] a few minutes ago. however it's a git-package,
so it's more appropriate to have it named mantis-wm-git [2]. please remove
[1]. sorry for the inconvenience. thanks.
regards,
nem
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59736
[2]
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 5:29 PM, n...@ikitten.co.uk wrote:
hej!
i provided mantis-wm [1] a few minutes ago. however it's a git-package,
so it's more appropriate to have it named mantis-wm-git [2]. please remove
[1]. sorry for the inconvenience. thanks.
regards,
nem
[1]
Fg
On Jun 3, 2012 8:18 AM, aur-general-requ...@archlinux.org wrote:
Send aur-general mailing list submissions to
aur-general@archlinux.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://mailman.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aur-general
or, via email, send a
On Fri 01 Jun 2012 20:28 +, Xyne wrote:
Loui Chang wrote:
It may be a bit of chicken-and-egg, though. The ppc/arm userbase might
grow if arch is seen stable enough and seems to have sufficient
packages, possibly making it worth being supported, but the lack of
infrastructure
Upstream is going through some major restructuring and a new release
isn't expected soon [1].
People using Cherokee should switch to one of the other web servers
available in Arch's repositories.
(I have submitted the existing PKGBUILD to the AUR. Note that it
currently doesn't build with the
Since lxshortcut now is in the community repo I'd be glad if it could be
removed form AUR.
Regards,
swanson (maintainer)
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Åke Svensson weba...@gmail.com wrote:
Since lxshortcut now is in the community repo I'd be glad if it could be
removed form AUR.
Regards,
swanson (maintainer)
Done, thanks.
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 08:58:57PM -0300, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote:
I was wondering what's the general approach given to these architectures
on AUR; since AUR is unsupported, is it ok to add these architectures to
the PKGBUILD's arch array?
What about a modded aur client, I could write a
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 01:38:01AM +0200, Martti Kühne wrote:
What about a modded aur client, I could write a patch to about any given aur
helper within minutes that would add the arch to the PKGBUILD after download,
which would simply add/enforce the desired arch.
Excuse my inability to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2012-06-03 20:44, Martti Kühne wrote:
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 01:38:01AM +0200, Martti Kühne wrote:
What about a modded aur client, I could write a patch to about
any given aur helper within minutes that would add the arch to
the PKGBUILD
On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 08:52:39PM -0300, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote:
But that would simply add arm or ppc to the ARCH array. The point
is to know beforehand if the package works - currently I can know if a
package works or not in my arch (amd64) by looking at the PKGBUILD.
That's the whole
18 matches
Mail list logo
