Re: [aur-general] jabref maintainer wanted

2012-06-08 Thread Hector Martinez-Seara
It's a pitty as it is a very useful program basic for the work of many of us, Hector On 8 June 2012 01:47, Allan McRae wrote: > On 05/06/12 07:07, Allan McRae wrote: >> Any TU want to take the maintenance of jabref in [community]?  I do not >> use it and there is a bug report that I can not be bo

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

2012-06-08 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 4 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 6 packages missing signoffs * 6 packages older than 14 days

[aur-general] Deletion Request

2012-06-08 Thread rafael ff1
lib32-dmd [1] was replaced with lib32-dmd1-complete, both provided by same maintainer. As confirmed by the maintainer, the package should be deleted. Please delete lib32-dmd [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55413

Re: [aur-general] Deletion Request

2012-06-08 Thread Sven-Hendrik Haase
On 06/08/2012 06:04 PM, rafael ff1 wrote: > lib32-dmd [1] was replaced with lib32-dmd1-complete, both provided by > same maintainer. As confirmed by the maintainer, the package should be > deleted. > > Please delete lib32-dmd > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55413 Done.

Re: [aur-general] Deletion Request

2012-06-08 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 7:04 PM, rafael ff1 wrote: > lib32-dmd [1] was replaced with lib32-dmd1-complete, both provided by > same maintainer. As confirmed by the maintainer, the package should be > deleted. > > Please delete lib32-dmd > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55413 Removed

Re: [aur-general] jabref maintainer wanted

2012-06-08 Thread Rashif Ray Rahman
On 8 June 2012 15:18, Hector Martinez-Seara wrote: > It's a pitty as it is a very useful program basic for the work of many of us, > Hector It is indeed. If only it didn't look so crappy or there wasn't any alternative I would've bothered to adopt it. However, look forward to KBibTeX and maybe Me

[aur-general] Package Removal Request [pygtk-shutdown-svn]

2012-06-08 Thread Austin Beatty
pygtk-shutdown-svn: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49761 This package has been switched to git for nearly a year now and I left the -svn package as a dummy transitional package, but it's been plenty of time now, and it should be deleted now. Thanks :)

Re: [aur-general] Package Removal Request [pygtk-shutdown-svn]

2012-06-08 Thread Austin Beatty
Oh, this one's a dummy package for the same thing, remove this too please. shutdown-dialog: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21001 On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Austin Beatty wrote: > pygtk-shutdown-svn: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49761 > > This package has been switched

[aur-general] Merge request

2012-06-08 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Please merge eclipse-scala into eclipse-scala-ide. The former is an outdated, orphaned version of the same software. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27200 (eclipse-scala) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=53917 (eclipse-scala-ide)