On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 5:07 AM, Schala Zeal wrote:
> I'd like mingw32-sqlite3 and mingw32-sqlite3-static deleted, as the
> native package is simply 'sqlite', not 'sqlite3'. I will be submitting
> mingw32-sqlite to reflect this convention. Thanks.
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=5343
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 4:30 AM, Masato Hashimoto
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could you merge ttf-ipaex[1] to otf-ipaexfont[2]?
> This fonts are actually otf but named *.ttf to avoid a problem on some OSs.
> I renamed it with the cleanup of PKGBUILD.
>
> Thanks
>
> [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?I
I'd like mingw32-sqlite3 and mingw32-sqlite3-static deleted, as the
native package is simply 'sqlite', not 'sqlite3'. I will be submitting
mingw32-sqlite to reflect this convention. Thanks.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=53438
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22029
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 4:46 AM, Vinycius Maia wrote:
>
> I'm not the current maintainer of the package named as linux-zen. I want to
> send to aur only the version with tarball and not the git version
My last sentence was directed at Matt (the maintainer of linux-zen);
he has responded in a pr
I'm not the current maintainer of the package named as linux-zen. I want to
send to aur only the version with tarball and not the git version
> Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 03:03:56 +0300
> From: evange...@foutrelis.com
> To: aur-general@archlinux.org
> CC: par...@gmail.com
> Subject: Re: [aur-genera
Hi,
Could you merge ttf-ipaex[1] to otf-ipaexfont[2]?
This fonts are actually otf but named *.ttf to avoid a problem on some OSs.
I renamed it with the cleanup of PKGBUILD.
Thanks
[1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35078
[2]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=61226
--
HASHIMOTO,
I believe it has an option in the build to use a tarball if necessary. It
gets it from the zen tags.
On Jul 26, 2012 7:03 PM, "Evangelos Foutras"
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 7:47 AM, Vinycius Maia
> wrote:
> >
> > Today I was creating the package linux-zen, but i noticed that already
> exis
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 7:47 AM, Vinycius Maia wrote:
>
> Today I was creating the package linux-zen, but i noticed that already
> existed in the aur[1], but check the package i have seen it was git version,
> then the package should not be linux-zen-git?
>
> The same occurs with linux-next[2]
>
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Rudy Matela wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The package oracle-datamodeler is clearly outdated. It was last
> updated on 2009 (2.0.0) and there is a datamodeler from April 2012
> (3.1.1).
>
> It's been flagged out-of-date for two months. There is a new version
> posted in the
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 1:46 AM, Allen Li wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could someone delete python-spynner? The official download from pypi has been
> down for a while now. I've uploaded python2-spynner-git which uses the
> development version. If and when the official download comes back, I'll
> reupload
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 1:52 AM, Vinycius Maia wrote:
>
> Please, disown weatherspect[1] , it is not updated since 2010.
> The maintainer has not responded to emails
>
> [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33366
Done, thanks.
Please, disown weatherspect[1] , it is not updated since 2010.
The maintainer has not responded to emails
[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33366
Hi,
Could someone delete python-spynner? The official download from pypi has been
down for a while now. I've uploaded python2-spynner-git which uses the
development version. If and when the official download comes back, I'll
reupload as python2-spynner as per proper naming conventions.
Allen L
Hello,
The package oracle-datamodeler is clearly outdated. It was last
updated on 2009 (2.0.0) and there is a datamodeler from April 2012
(3.1.1).
It's been flagged out-of-date for two months. There is a new version
posted in the comments for two months also with no response from the
maintainer.
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 2 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 24 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days
Hello,
please remove conky-lua-dev [1]. I marked it as out-of-date and
emailed the maintainer 2 weeks ago with no response. The same user has
conky-lua-git [2], which is still outdated but should be used since
development is done in git now.
Regards,
Chris Sakalis
[1] - https://aur.archlinux.org/
16 matches
Mail list logo