[aur-general] [Deletion Request] gtkprobability

2012-10-12 Thread Eric Waller
Please delete my package aur/gtkprobability. I had meant to release it as aur/probability and has been superseded by a more advanced version of the program. I also coded it using straight gtk rather than gtkmm. Thanks signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [aur-general] Anybody interested in maintaining courier stuff in [community]?

2012-10-12 Thread Eric Bélanger
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 6:28 AM, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: > On 05/15/2012 08:39 AM, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: >> I recently changed away from using courier but as they are server >> packages they need close maintenance because they are critical to some >> people. I wondered whether any TU would li

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: ess-svn

2012-10-12 Thread Stefan Husmann
Am 13.10.2012 00:17, schrieb Evangelos Foutras: On 13/10/12 01:11, Stefan Husmann wrote: Hello, please delete ess-svn [1], which was accidentely uploaded. It is a duplicate of [2]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62644 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47312 Best Reg

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: ess-svn

2012-10-12 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On 13/10/12 01:11, Stefan Husmann wrote: > Hello, > > please delete ess-svn [1], which was accidentely uploaded. It is a > duplicate of [2]. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62644 > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47312 > > Best Regards Stefan Done, thanks.

[aur-general] Delete request: ess-svn

2012-10-12 Thread Stefan Husmann
Hello, please delete ess-svn [1], which was accidentely uploaded. It is a duplicate of [2]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62644 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47312 Best Regards Stefan

Re: [aur-general] GLU rebuilds

2012-10-12 Thread Sven-Hendrik Haase
On 12.10.2012 22:12, Andreas Radke wrote: This is a reminder. TUs, please finish the glu rebuilds. I'd like to move this Xorg/Mesa stuff soon out of testing. -Andy Can't, Python 3.3 is blocking Blender.

[aur-general] GLU rebuilds

2012-10-12 Thread Andreas Radke
This is a reminder. TUs, please finish the glu rebuilds. I'd like to move this Xorg/Mesa stuff soon out of testing. -Andy signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

2012-10-12 Thread Ike Devolder
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 08:01:31PM +0530, Keshav P R wrote: > Hi, > Please delete gummiboot-efi-x86_64 [1] and efilinux-efi-x86_64 [2] > as they are now part of extra/gummiboot-efi and extra/efilinux-efi > respectively. both deleted > > Please merge gummiboot-efi-x86_64-git [3] into gummiboo

[aur-general] Deletion request

2012-10-12 Thread Keshav P R
Hi, Please delete gummiboot-efi-x86_64 [1] and efilinux-efi-x86_64 [2] as they are now part of extra/gummiboot-efi and extra/efilinux-efi respectively. Please merge gummiboot-efi-x86_64-git [3] into gummiboot-efi-git [4] and refind-efi-x86_64-git [5] into refind-efi-tianocore-git [6] . Thanks

Re: [aur-general] [pacman][Feature Request] make pacman case-insensitive.

2012-10-12 Thread Lone_Wolf
> Hello, all: > > When we run "pacman -S Firefox", we will get "error: target not found: > Firefox" because there is only firefox, not Firefox, in repo. IMHO it > could be better if pacman is case insensitive. > > Regards, > Mizuchi > > Bad idea for several reasons : - Arch package names are all l

Re: [aur-general] [pacman][Feature Request] make pacman case-insensitive.

2012-10-12 Thread Dave Reisner
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 02:59:22PM +0200, Karol Blazewicz wrote: > On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Dave Reisner wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 08:43:53PM +0800, Tianjiao Yin wrote: > >> Hello, all: > >> > >> When we run "pacman -S Firefox", we will get "error: target not found: > >> Firefox"

Re: [aur-general] [pacman][Feature Request] make pacman case-insensitive.

2012-10-12 Thread nobody44
Hello, Try pacman -R FIREFOX and pacman -R firefox In this case, it is case sensitive. But: pacman -Ss FIREFOX This is case-insensitive. Please do not make pacman -S(R) case-insensitive. I don't like the idea, because the next "feature" would be case-insensitive paths. nobody44 On 12.10.2012

Re: [aur-general] [pacman][Feature Request] make pacman case-insensitive.

2012-10-12 Thread Alexandre Ferrando
On 12 October 2012 14:59, Karol Blazewicz wrote: > On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Dave Reisner wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 08:43:53PM +0800, Tianjiao Yin wrote: >>> Hello, all: >>> >>> When we run "pacman -S Firefox", we will get "error: target not found: >>> Firefox" because there is onl

Re: [aur-general] [pacman][Feature Request] make pacman case-insensitive.

2012-10-12 Thread Karol Blazewicz
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Dave Reisner wrote: > On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 08:43:53PM +0800, Tianjiao Yin wrote: >> Hello, all: >> >> When we run "pacman -S Firefox", we will get "error: target not found: >> Firefox" because there is only firefox, not Firefox, in repo. IMHO it >> could be bett

Re: [aur-general] [pacman][Feature Request] make pacman case-insensitive.

2012-10-12 Thread Karol Blazewicz
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Tianjiao Yin wrote: > Hello, all: > > When we run "pacman -S Firefox", we will get "error: target not found: > Firefox" because there is only firefox, not Firefox, in repo. IMHO it > could be better if pacman is case insensitive. > > Regards, > Mizuchi Wrong list,

Re: [aur-general] [pacman][Feature Request] make pacman case-insensitive.

2012-10-12 Thread Dave Reisner
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 08:43:53PM +0800, Tianjiao Yin wrote: > Hello, all: > > When we run "pacman -S Firefox", we will get "error: target not found: > Firefox" because there is only firefox, not Firefox, in repo. IMHO it > could be better if pacman is case insensitive. > > Regards, > Mizuchi P

[aur-general] [pacman][Feature Request] make pacman case-insensitive.

2012-10-12 Thread Tianjiao Yin
Hello, all: When we run "pacman -S Firefox", we will get "error: target not found: Firefox" because there is only firefox, not Firefox, in repo. IMHO it could be better if pacman is case insensitive. Regards, Mizuchi

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

2012-10-12 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 20 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 112 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 da