On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Kwpolska wrote:
> But I think that two things need improvement:
> 1. I tried to insert the key ID (4 chars) instead of the fingerprint
> (40.) A hint (like gpg --fingerprint) would be useful.
The input box is labeled "PGP Key Fingerprint" not "PGP Key ID". A bi
According to Kwpolska:
# 2. Cannot unflag a package unless you’re the maintainer — sometimes,
# flags are made errorneously and you need to revert it.
+1 here. It's great that not just anyone can unflag a package, but if I
inadvertently flag a package, it's better if I can revert the flag
mysel
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Lukas Fleischer
wrote:
> Hi, everybody!
>
> The official Arch Linux AUR setup has been upgraded to 2.0.0. For a list
> of changes, you can read the release announcements [1], [2], [3] and the
> Git log [4].
>
> Please report any issues on the AUR bug tracker [5].
>
Hi,
Thanks for the new AUR! It looks great, and I've already discovered
new functionality that I found useful. GJ
--
Best regards,
Alexander Rødseth
xyproto / TU
On 11/04/2012 10:40 PM, Simon Legner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please remove the outdated and unmaintained package usb-creator-trunk:
>https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/usb-creator-trunk/
>
> Note that the package usb-creator is up-to-date and maintained:
>https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/usb-c
Hi,
please remove the outdated and unmaintained package usb-creator-trunk:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/usb-creator-trunk/
Note that the package usb-creator is up-to-date and maintained:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/usb-creator/
Thanks,
Simon
According to Dave Reisner:
# CREATE UNIQUE INDEX VoteUsersIDPackageID ON PackageVotes (UsersID,
# PackageID);
#
# This was the case in 1.9.1 as well. If the AUR says you haven't voted,
# then I'd say it means you haven't voted.
Ah OK. The fix in the log made me just a little nervous. Maybe I didn
On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 09:01:33AM -0500, Kyle wrote:
> The new AUR is awesome! Regarding voting, I saw some fixes listed in
> the log, but I think I may have accidentally voted for some packages
> more than once, because the page indicated I hadn't voted, which
> seems to be the bug that was fixed
The new AUR is awesome! Regarding voting, I saw some fixes listed in the
log, but I think I may have accidentally voted for some packages more
than once, because the page indicated I hadn't voted, which seems to be
the bug that was fixed in 2.0.0. One of my packages, qt-at-spi-git,
which I spec
Op zondag 4 november 2012 12:09:37 schreef Lukas Fleischer:
> Hi, everybody!
>
> The official Arch Linux AUR setup has been upgraded to 2.0.0. For a list
> of changes, you can read the release announcements [1], [2], [3] and the
> Git log [4].
>
> Please report any issues on the AUR bug tracker [
Hi, everybody!
The official Arch Linux AUR setup has been upgraded to 2.0.0. For a list
of changes, you can read the release announcements [1], [2], [3] and the
Git log [4].
Please report any issues on the AUR bug tracker [5].
[1] https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-dev/2012-October/0021
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 4 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 32 packages missing signoffs
* 2 packages older than 14 days
12 matches
Mail list logo
