[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

2012-12-17 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 22 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days

Re: [aur-general] A TU keeps removing harmless and relevant comments from my package's webpage

2012-12-17 Thread Alexander Rødseth
Hello, You guys only have half the story here. Xavion has been really obnoxious: - Saying things like "let me remind you that you're not a TU" to a friendly comment from another user on AUR, suggesting that he did not host his script/application directly in the package - Asking if the people i

Re: [aur-general] A TU keeps removing harmless and relevant comments from my package's webpage

2012-12-17 Thread Xyne
Alexander Rødseth wrote: >In the end, after much back and forth, the comments for the >"popular-packages" package on AUR was filled with discussion about >where and how the script should be hosted, sprinkled with random >insults, with _nothing of interest what so ever_ for casual users that >just

[aur-general] [Package Removal Request] reviewboard-django-pipeline

2012-12-17 Thread Artyom Olshevskiy
Please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/reviewboard-django-pipeline. It was a temp package to satisfy reviewboard dependency. Not needed now since I owned the original django-pipeline package. Thanks in advance.

Re: [aur-general] [Package Removal Request] reviewboard-django-pipeline

2012-12-17 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Artyom Olshevskiy wrote: > Please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/reviewboard-django-pipeline. > It was a temp package to satisfy reviewboard dependency. Not needed > now > since I owned the original django-pipeline package. Thanks in advance. Removed, t

Re: [aur-general] A TU keeps removing harmless and relevant comments from my package's webpage

2012-12-17 Thread Zeke Sulastin
> > You guys only have half the story here. > If this is the case, do what forum moderators do and leave a little note explaining what was moderated away and thus why moderation took place to begin with. This goes a long way to dispelling he-said-she-said crap, especially when the moderated user

[aur-general] Duplicate package php-mongodb

2012-12-17 Thread Jarek Sedlacek
Package php-mongodb [1] is a duplicate of php-mongo[2]. I emailed the maintainer of php-mongodb, he is fine with the it being merged into php-mongo. Can these be merged (or php-mongodb deleted)? [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/php-mongodb/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/php-mongo/

Re: [aur-general] Duplicate package php-mongodb

2012-12-17 Thread Connor Behan
On 17/12/12 02:39 PM, Jarek Sedlacek wrote: > Package php-mongodb [1] is a duplicate of php-mongo[2]. I emailed the > maintainer of php-mongodb, he is fine with the it being merged into > php-mongo. Can these be merged (or php-mongodb deleted)? > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/php-mongodb