[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

2013-01-28 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 84 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 90 packages missing signoffs * 4 packages older than 14 day

[aur-general] request removal: perl-file-fctnllock

2013-01-28 Thread Johannes Dewender
Please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-file-fctnllock/ (which I created yesterday) There is a typo in the name, I realized that a couple of hours later and created the correct package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl- file-fcntllock/ -- JonnyJD signature.asc Description:

Re: [aur-general] Disown request: python-unidecode

2013-01-28 Thread Felix Yan
On Sunday, January 27, 2013 06:24:07 PM Kwpolska wrote: > Hello, > i’d like to have the following package disowned: > > python-unidecode — https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-unidecode/ > Reason: outdated, wrong naming, maintainer hasn’t been around since 2011 (!) > > Thanks in advance, > Dis

Re: [aur-general] Disown Request: haproxy

2013-01-28 Thread Felix Yan
On Sunday, January 27, 2013 11:46:48 PM Srijan Choudhary wrote: > Please disown haproxy package[1]. It has been flagged out of date since > 2012-10-30, and I emailed the maintainer on 2013-01-02 but got no > response. Also, I have an updated PKGBUILD ready to upload. > > [1]: https://aur.archlinux

Re: [aur-general] request removal: perl-file-fctnllock

2013-01-28 Thread Felix Yan
On Monday, January 28, 2013 12:17:51 PM Johannes Dewender wrote: > > Please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-file-fctnllock/ > (which I created yesterday) > > There is a typo in the name, I realized that a couple of hours later and > created the correct package: https://aur.archlin

[aur-general] disown Request: tpacpi-bat

2013-01-28 Thread Moritz Rudert (helios)
Please disown tpacpi-bat [1]. It has been flagged out of date since 2012-12-21, the maintainer did not respond to comments and the package was last updated 2011-11-25 (same date as first submitted). [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tpacpi-bat/ Thanks, helios

Re: [aur-general] disown Request: tpacpi-bat

2013-01-28 Thread Felix Yan
On Monday, January 28, 2013 12:46:46 PM Moritz Rudert wrote: > Please disown tpacpi-bat [1]. It has been flagged out of date since > 2012-12-21, the maintainer did not respond to comments and the package > was last updated 2011-11-25 (same date as first submitted). > > [1]: https://aur.archlinux.o

Re: [aur-general] Merge request: yapsy → python2-yapsy; pyrss2gen → python2-pyrss2gen

2013-01-28 Thread Bartłomiej Piotrowski
On 01/28/2013 12:49 PM, Kwpolska wrote: > Hello, > I’d like to request those two mergers for packages with better naming: > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/yapsy/ → > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-yapsy/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pyrss2gen/ → > https://aur.archlinux.or

[aur-general] Disown Request: perl-perl-prereqscanner

2013-01-28 Thread GlitchMr
Please disown perl-perl-prereqscanner [1]. The package was marked as out of date since 2011. I have tried contacting the maintainer (by e-mail), but haven't got a response within two weeks. I find it interesting, considering the other package maintained by the same person (perl-dist-zilla) depends

Re: [aur-general] Disown Request: perl-perl-prereqscanner

2013-01-28 Thread Felix Yan
On Monday, January 28, 2013 01:27:23 PM GlitchMr wrote: > Please disown perl-perl-prereqscanner [1]. The package was marked as out > of date since 2011. I have tried contacting the maintainer (by e-mail), > but haven't got a response within two weeks. I find it interesting, > considering the other

Re: [aur-general] Delete kupfer-add-git

2013-01-28 Thread Felix Yan
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 8:55 PM, SanskritFritz wrote: > Please delete my package > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kupfer-add-git/ > as I have renamed it to kupfer-adds-git. No need to merge anything (no > votes, no comments). Removed, thanks. -- Felix Yan Twitter: @felixonmars Wiki: http://f

Re: [aur-general] Delete kupfer-add-git

2013-01-28 Thread SanskritFritz
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Felix Yan wrote: > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 8:55 PM, SanskritFritz > wrote: > > Please delete my package > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kupfer-add-git/ > > as I have renamed it to kupfer-adds-git. No need to merge anything (no > > votes, no comments). > Re

[aur-general] Status of openshadinglanguage

2013-01-28 Thread Chirantan Ekbote
Hello, When I tried to upgrade blender today I got an unresolved dependency error for openshadinglanguage. After some searching I found it in [community-testing] [0]. It's been in there since 2013-01-03 and appears to be an orphaned package. While there is a git version in the AUR [1], I would

[aur-general] Request for comments: new tdom package - replace or additional git

2013-01-28 Thread Uwe Koloska
Hello, since I'm really new to archlinux and the AUR I would like to get some comments on my first package, derived from an existing one: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tdom/ Since the update to tcl 8.6 it is not possible to build the package. Their is no current tagged version so I have cr

Re: [aur-general] Request for comments: new tdom package - replace or additional git

2013-01-28 Thread Limao Luo
On 01/28/2013 06:58 PM, Uwe Koloska wrote: Hello, since I'm really new to archlinux and the AUR Welcome to Arch! I would like to get some comments on my first package, derived from an existing one: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tdom/ Since the update to tcl 8.6 it is not possible to

Re: [aur-general] Request for comments: new tdom package - replace or additional git

2013-01-28 Thread Limao Luo
On 01/28/2013 07:24 PM, Limao Luo wrote: On 01/28/2013 06:58 PM, Uwe Koloska wrote: What's best: make a new package tdom-git that uses the github master branch or just change the current package? Or make a "stable" package that uses the last tagged version and patch the support for tcl 8.6? (a

Re: [aur-general] Request for comments: new tdom package - replace or additional git

2013-01-28 Thread Daniel Wallace
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:58:42AM +0100, Uwe Koloska wrote: > Hello, > > since I'm really new to archlinux and the AUR I would like to get some > comments on my first package, derived from an existing one: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tdom/ > Since the update to tcl 8.6 it is not possib

Re: [aur-general] Status of openshadinglanguage

2013-01-28 Thread Sven-Hendrik Haase
On 28.01.2013 21:55, Chirantan Ekbote wrote: > Hello, > > When I tried to upgrade blender today I got an unresolved dependency error > for openshadinglanguage. After some searching I found it in > [community-testing] [0]. It's been in there since 2013-01-03 and appears > to be an orphaned package