On Thu, 07 Mar 2013 01:20:15 +0100, Laurent Carlier
wrote:
> Le mercredi 27 février 2013 16:53:07 vous avez écrit :
> > I have orphaned these packages i don't want to maintain anymore.
> >
> > The road to AUR is already traced.
> >
> > https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/winest
On Wed, 6 Mar 2013 18:03:53 -0600, Doug Newgard wrote:
> **DELETE**
>
> Dead, source gone:
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/clictap/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tetex/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gustop/
>
> **MERGE**
>
> Enlightenment is switching from SVN to Git.
>
>
Le mercredi 27 février 2013 16:53:07 vous avez écrit :
> I have orphaned these packages i don't want to maintain anymore.
>
> The road to AUR is already traced.
>
> https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/winestuff/
> https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/winegame/
Packag
**DELETE**
Dead, source gone:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/clictap/
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tetex/
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gustop/
**MERGE**
Enlightenment is switching from SVN to Git.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/emotion_generic_players-svn/ INTO
https://aur.
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Jakob Gruber wrote:
> On 03/06/2013 11:32 PM, SanskritFritz wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 11:27 PM, Jakob Gruber wrote:
>>> I've disowned the firehol
>>
>> This is sad news. May I know the reason? Of course when you drop it to
>> the AUR I will immediately pick
On 03/06/2013 11:32 PM, SanskritFritz wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 11:27 PM, Jakob Gruber wrote:
>> I've disowned the firehol
>
> This is sad news. May I know the reason? Of course when you drop it to
> the AUR I will immediately pick it up then.
I haven't used firehol for ages, and it curren
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 11:27 PM, Jakob Gruber wrote:
> I've disowned the firehol
This is sad news. May I know the reason? Of course when you drop it to
the AUR I will immediately pick it up then.
I've disowned the firehol and me-tv packages in [community]. If nobody
adopts them within a week or so, they will be moved to the AUR.
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/firehol/
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/me-tv/
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i
On Wed, 6 Mar 2013 18:45:33 +0100, Florian Dejonckheere
wrote:
> Tuxedo [1] is now known as Recuerde [2]. I've adopted and updated the
> Recuerde package. Please delete Tuxedo.
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tuxedo/
> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/recuerde/
>
>
> *Florian D
I really don't want to see captchas on the AUR (Google doesn't need to more
info), nor do I think playing whack-a-mole with disposable email providers is a
good idea.
What I think we really need is an internal limit on flagging packages. It could
be tied to the age of the account and/or hourly rat
Tuxedo [1] is now known as Recuerde [2]. I've adopted and updated the
Recuerde package. Please delete Tuxedo.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tuxedo/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/recuerde/
*Florian Dejonckheere*
flor...@floriandejonckheere.be
http://www.floriandejonckheere.be
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Florian Dejonckheere
wrote:
> The package subget-git [1] is outdated, does not build and depends on the
> package alang-git [2], for which upstream is gone. The maintainer and
> developer of both is webnull, and he did not respond to email (sent on
> 17/02).
Delete
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 8:08 AM, Eiro Neemous wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 06, 2013 12:58:49 Felix Yan wrote:
>>
>> On Wednesday, March 06, 2013 20:54:25 Eiro Neemous wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, March 06, 2013 12:48:58 Felix Yan wrote:
>>> > On Wednesday, March 06, 2013 11:23:31 Eiro Neemous wrote
The package subget-git [1] is outdated, does not build and depends on the
package alang-git [2], for which upstream is gone. The maintainer and
developer of both is webnull, and he did not respond to email (sent on
17/02).
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/subget-git/
[2] https://aur.archlinu
First: fetcher [1]. It's been superseded by gayeogi for a long time now and
is not even available for download.
Second: (python2-)flakey [2], [3]. They were pyflakes forks meant to be
used by flake8 and I prepared them in advance, but flake8 maintainer
somehow managed to merge those upstream, so w
Hi,
could you delete my AUR account please?
Thanks, SiD
username: sidious
e-mail: mist...@web.de
On Thu, 2013-03-07 at 00:57 +0900, Zhengyu Xu wrote:
> On 02/19/2013 11:06 PM, Zhengyu Xu wrote:
> > On 02/19/2013 11:02 PM, Martti Kühne wrote:
> >> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Zhengyu Xu wrote:
> >>> Dear TUs,
> >>>
> >>> Please help me to disown the package: gtk-theme-evolve at [1]. This
On 02/19/2013 11:06 PM, Zhengyu Xu wrote:
On 02/19/2013 11:02 PM, Martti Kühne wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Zhengyu Xu wrote:
Dear TUs,
Please help me to disown the package: gtk-theme-evolve at [1]. This
package
has been flagged out-of-date for more than two weeks without any
upd
On 6 March 2013 15:32, Brandon Dulaney wrote:
> To Whom It May Concern:
>
> Sorry to be a bother, but I forgot my username on Aur and was informed on
> the bbs.archlinux.org to send an email to you about it. I'm wanting to
> update the Dungeon Defenders PKGBUILD because a new release of the game w
To Whom It May Concern:
Sorry to be a bother, but I forgot my username on Aur and was informed on
the bbs.archlinux.org to send an email to you about it. I'm wanting to
update the Dungeon Defenders PKGBUILD because a new release of the game was
just released yesterday or the day before.
My email
On Wednesday, March 06, 2013 12:58:49 Felix Yan wrote:
On Wednesday, March 06, 2013 20:54:25 Eiro Neemous wrote:
On Wednesday, March 06, 2013 12:48:58 Felix Yan wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 06, 2013 11:23:31 Eiro Neemous wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm the maintainer of terminology-svn and terminology-g
On Wednesday, March 06, 2013 20:54:25 Eiro Neemous wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 06, 2013 12:48:58 Felix Yan wrote:
> > On Wednesday, March 06, 2013 11:23:31 Eiro Neemous wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'm the maintainer of terminology-svn and terminology-git, please merge
> >> the comments and votes of
On Wednesday, March 06, 2013 12:48:58 Felix Yan wrote:
On Wednesday, March 06, 2013 11:23:31 Eiro Neemous wrote:
Hi,
I'm the maintainer of terminology-svn and terminology-git, please merge
the comments and votes of terminology-svn into terminology-git, and
leave
terminology-svn as "out-of-dat
On Wednesday, March 06, 2013 11:23:31 Eiro Neemous wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm the maintainer of terminology-svn and terminology-git, please merge
> the comments and votes of terminology-svn into terminology-git, and leave
> terminology-svn as "out-of-date" package (in other words, don't delete it
> now)
Hi,
I'm the maintainer of terminology-svn and terminology-git, please merge
the comments and votes of terminology-svn into terminology-git, and leave
terminology-svn as "out-of-date" package (in other words, don't delete it
now), thanks in advance! :)
Regards,
Eiro Neemous
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 26 packages missing signoffs
* 4 packages older than 14 days
On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 01:16 -0500, Allen Li wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 11:30:05PM -0500, Limao Luo wrote:
> >On 03/05/2013 11:21 PM, William Giokas wrote:
> >>Captchas, man. Captchas. I know it will very very slightly inconvenience
> >>some people that have to flag a few packages out of date
27 matches
Mail list logo
