On Saturday, March 09, 2013 18:58:33 Adrian C. wrote:
> Hello, my package gajim-otr-hg[1] is obosolete since February 2012, when
> alternative OTR solution was added to gajim v0.15 as a plugin.
>
> I waited one year, during which all users were notified about the new
> solution, before requestin
On Saturday, March 09, 2013 22:52:12 Jakub Klinkovský wrote:
> Hi,
> upstream for these packages[1][2] is missing, please delete it.
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/eclipse-qt-eclipse-integration/
> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/eclipse-qt-eclipse-integration-bin/
Both removed,
On Saturday, March 09, 2013 21:11:32 Limao Luo wrote:
> On 03/09/2013 04:30 PM, Limao Luo wrote:
> > I emailed the maintainer of machinarium [1] a month ago (Feb 12) with
> > no response or update until now. The package is out-of-date (missing a
> > couple dependencies, and the included script is
On 03/09/2013 04:30 PM, Limao Luo wrote:
I emailed the maintainer of machinarium [1] a month ago (Feb 12) with
no response or update until now. The package is out-of-date (missing a
couple dependencies, and the included script is broken) and I am ready
to maintain it.
[1] https://aur.archlinu
Hi,
upstream for these packages[1][2] is missing, please delete it.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/eclipse-qt-eclipse-integration/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/eclipse-qt-eclipse-integration-bin/
I emailed the maintainer of machinarium [1] a month ago (Feb 12) with no
response or update until now. The package is out-of-date (missing a
couple dependencies, and the included script is broken) and I am ready
to maintain it.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/machinarium/
Best Regards
Stefan
Thx.
Hello,
processing the aurdupes starting list from the end of the alphabet, I found
some other niceties.
yabause (VCS)
* yabause-svn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/yabause-svn/
* yabause-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/yabause-git/ not mentioned on
the
Laurent Carlier writes:
> Merged.
>
> Thanks
> ++
>
Does it take a while for merging to happen because the amdstream package/page is
still there.
Le samedi 9 mars 2013 17:34:36 Vi0L0 a écrit :
> Hi,
> can amdstream[1] be merged (or somehow linked) to amdapp-sdk[2]?
> I've created amdapp-sdk some time ago basing on amdstream, i believe that
> amdapp-sdk is better and more logical name than not-used-anymore "stream"
> name.
> I've also created
Am 08.03.2013 16:24, schrieb Maxime Gauduin:
On Fri, 2013-03-08 at 15:25 +0100, Stefan Husmann wrote:
Hello,
some bumps and new requests.
Am 16.02.2013 22:25, schrieb Stefan Husmann:
* elixir-svn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/elixir-svn/
See AUR comments. No objection to delete this fro
Hello, my package gajim-otr-hg[1] is obosolete since February 2012, when
alternative OTR solution was added to gajim v0.15 as a plugin.
I waited one year, during which all users were notified about the new
solution, before requesting deletion which I'm doing now. Thanks.
1. https://aur.archlin
On Saturday, March 09, 2013 17:42:32 Vi0L0 wrote:
> Hi,
> can you remove my old package lib32-catalyst-utils-test[1], it's not needed
> for a long time and (shame on me ) i've actually forget about it.
> Thanks in advance!
>
> [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lib32-catalyst-utils-test/
>
>
Hi,
can you remove my old package lib32-catalyst-utils-test[1], it's not needed
for a long time and (shame on me ) i've actually forget about it.
Thanks in advance!
[1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lib32-catalyst-utils-test/
Greetz
Vi0L0
GPG key: http://keys.gnupg.net/pks/lookup?op=get&sear
Hi,
can amdstream[1] be merged (or somehow linked) to amdapp-sdk[2]?
I've created amdapp-sdk some time ago basing on amdstream, i believe that
amdapp-sdk is better and more logical name than not-used-anymore "stream"
name.
I've also created the group of amdapp[3] packages for opencl developement,
On Saturday, March 09, 2013 20:51:28 Keshav Padram wrote:
> Hi,
> Please merge gummiboot-efi-git [1] into gummiboot-git [2] as the
> package has been renamed to match official repo pkgname.
>
> [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gummiboot-efi-git/
> [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages
On Saturday, March 09, 2013 15:40:16 Zom Aur wrote:
> Hi, resending this since it seems to have been missed last time.
>
> Please merge votes and comments from
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bempc/ to
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bempc-git/
>
> Apparently, the KDE-look package isn't
On Saturday, March 09, 2013 06:42:41 Kevin Vesga wrote:
> The following list of packages are either out-of-date or need fixing. I
> have contacted the maintainers but they have not replied in two weeks.
> Please orphan the packages.
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/amdstream/
> https://aur.a
The following list of packages are either out-of-date or need fixing. I
have contacted the maintainers but they have not replied in two weeks.
Please orphan the packages.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/amdstream/
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bin32-flashplayer-standalone/
https://aur.arch
Hi, resending this since it seems to have been missed last time.
Please merge votes and comments from
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bempc/ to
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bempc-git/
Apparently, the KDE-look package isn't actively updated any more, so the
git version should be what we u
On 9 March 2013 14:09, Kwpolska wrote:
> Hi,
>
> python-django[0] is an unnecessary clone of the django package from
> the repos. It shouldn’t be even created, but it somehow was, so
> please nuke it.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Chris.
>
> [0]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-django/
It's
Hi,
python-django[0] is an unnecessary clone of the django package from
the repos. It shouldn’t be even created, but it somehow was, so
please nuke it.
Thanks in advance,
Chris.
[0]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-django/
Federico Cinelli wrote:
>On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 01:46:11 +, Vítor Miguel Miranda Ferreira
> wrote:
>> Greetings!
>> I hereby request that the rosa-media-player-git [1] package be deleted,
>> since I intend to replace it by a similar package derived from the develop
>> branch of the rosa-media-play
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 3:22 AM, Vítor Miguel Miranda Ferreira
wrote:
> I guess then I'll have to wait until you rename the package in order to
> upload the renamed and rebuild source tarball. Right?
>
>
erm..
Just in case I'm following your thoughts correctly: TUs don't do that. [1]
Upload the p
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 22 packages missing signoffs
* 14 packages older than 14 day
24 matches
Mail list logo
