=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 14 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 35 packages missing signoffs
* 14 packages older than 14
IMWO TUs can wait 2 weeks after sending an email like all other normal people.
This isn't schoolyard people, come on.
cheers!
mar77i
On 03/13/2013 05:49 AM, Daniel Wallace wrote:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:25:58PM -0400, Yichao Yu wrote:
Hi,
A TU gtmanfred have just decided to remove one of my package just
one minute after he commented on the package pointed out the missing
package() in the PKGBUILD without any further
Status quo:
06:54 gtmanfred ok, it really is time for something else
06:54 gtmanfred the spammer is now creating a new account for
every comment and flag out of date
The account suspension feature does not help here.
Options:
* Allow package maintainers to block the Flag package
Hi,
I'll start this off with an anecdotal story:
When I first became a TU, I just gave short (but polite and friendly)
notices when moving packages from AUR to [community], because I felt I was
in the right to just move them at will (if they fullfilled the requirements
for being moved, of
On Wed, 2013-03-13 at 11:33 +0100, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
Status quo:
06:54 gtmanfred ok, it really is time for something else
06:54 gtmanfred the spammer is now creating a new account for
every comment and flag out of date
The account suspension feature does not help here.
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 11:48:50AM +0100, Maxime Gauduin wrote:
On Wed, 2013-03-13 at 11:33 +0100, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
Status quo:
06:54 gtmanfred ok, it really is time for something else
06:54 gtmanfred the spammer is now creating a new account for
every comment and
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 06:59:59PM +0800, Felix Yan wrote:
On Wednesday, March 13, 2013 11:48:50 Maxime Gauduin wrote:
On Wed, 2013-03-13 at 11:33 +0100, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
Status quo:
[...]
* Use CAPTCHAs during account registration. We could either use MAPTCHAs
(What
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 11:55:26AM +0100, Markus Unterwaditzer wrote:
Lukas Fleischer archli...@cryptocrack.de wrote:
Status quo:
06:54 gtmanfred ok, it really is time for something else
06:54 gtmanfred the spammer is now creating a new account for
every comment and flag out
Hi,
i would like to suggest a captcha only on user registering. And some
time/quantity limit for some actions, like said before: 10 out of date
within an hour (a real user takes a time verify that a package is really
out of date; and this rate does not block real people to help verifying
Please merge
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/picard-plugins-lastfmplus/
into
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/picard-plugins/
The lastfmplus plugin is now included in the base plugin
package.
--
JonnyJD
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 09:37:35AM +0100, Martti Kühne wrote:
IMWO TUs can wait 2 weeks after sending an email like all other normal people.
This isn't schoolyard people, come on.
cheers!
mar77i
If two weeks is an unwritten rule ( which makes sense IMHO, even I'm unpatient
by myself ;-) ),
Hi, I hope I'm at the right place to ask for help, but let's begin :)
The KOLAB (http://kolab.org/) Groupware project is searching for AUR
maintainers for their open source groupware solution.
Unfortunately, this project is not well known outside of Germany.
Therefore, probably you've never
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 12:23:53PM +0100, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 06:59:59PM +0800, Felix Yan wrote:
On Wednesday, March 13, 2013 11:48:50 Maxime Gauduin wrote:
On Wed, 2013-03-13 at 11:33 +0100, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
Status quo:
[...]
* Use
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Lukas Fleischer
archli...@cryptocrack.de wrote:
Status quo:
06:54 gtmanfred ok, it really is time for something else
06:54 gtmanfred the spammer is now creating a new account for
every comment and flag out of date
The account suspension
There have been exactly zero spammers on the ArchWiki since the
captcha was added for registration, the last time a user had to be
blocked was 2011.
Den 13-03-2013 15:36, Kwpolska skrev:
Maybe block the ability of commenting and flagging in the first 24
hours of an user account’s existence?
I'm (wildly) guessing that most regular users sign up for the sake of
making a comment. Requiring them to wait 24 hours before being able to
do so
Hello,
please delete goffice-light. I think it is not needed. The only dependencies
build fine with goffice from [extra].
Best Regards Stefan
aur/nss-pam-ldapd [1] was moved to community/nss-pam-ldapd [2]
aur/nss-pam-ldapd [1] should be deleted.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nss-pam-ldapd
[2] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/?name=nss-pam-ldapd
On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 15:14:37 -0500, Zack Buhman z...@buhman.org wrote:
aur/nss-pam-ldapd [1] was moved to community/nss-pam-ldapd [2]
aur/nss-pam-ldapd [1] should be deleted.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nss-pam-ldapd
[2] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/?name=nss-pam-ldapd
Ionut Biru wrote:
mate, you did something wrong, stop trying to find out excuses for your
actions.
please do not delete builds like that anymore, leave comments about any
issues with the build and give them time to accommodate with the changes
This.
Obliterating votes and comments and forcing
On 13/03/13 05:06 AM, Johannes Dewender wrote:
Please merge
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/picard-plugins-lastfmplus/
into
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/picard-plugins/
The lastfmplus plugin is now included in the base plugin
package.
--
JonnyJD
Merged, thanks!
signature.asc
Lukas Fleischer wrote:
Status quo:
06:54 gtmanfred ok, it really is time for something else
06:54 gtmanfred the spammer is now creating a new account for
every comment and flag out of date
The account suspension feature does not help here.
Options:
* Allow package maintainers to
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 11:55:26AM +0100, Markus Unterwaditzer wrote:
Other options:
* Deny the repeating of a specific action... e.g. you may not flag more than
ten packages within ten minutes. Also block comments with same content.
* ability to report users (dunno if already possible),
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 12:44:26AM +, Xyne wrote:
[...]
How hard would it be to create an action queue for comments and flagging?
The idea would be to add a new field to the user accounts table (e.g. a
boolean
named supervise). The default value would be true for new accounts. The
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 02:56:35AM +0100, oliver wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 09:31:47PM -0400, Allen Li wrote:
[...]
Limiting repeated actions also sounds good (if someone really needs to,
e.g., flag a lot of packages, they can just drop a request here and let
a TU handle it), but it
On 13/03/13 06:57 PM, oliver wrote:
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 02:56:35AM +0100, oliver wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 09:31:47PM -0400, Allen Li wrote:
[...]
Limiting repeated actions also sounds good (if someone really needs to,
e.g., flag a lot of packages, they can just drop a request here
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 12:05:04AM +, Xyne wrote:
Ionut Biru wrote:
mate, you did something wrong, stop trying to find out excuses for your
actions.
please do not delete builds like that anymore, leave comments about any
issues with the build and give them time to accommodate with the
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Daniel Wallace
danielwall...@gtmanfred.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 12:05:04AM +, Xyne wrote:
Ionut Biru wrote:
Well, technically, it is just ~23h from my last email but hopefully
Brock.Zheng will agree to call this one day. :P
mate, you did
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 07:15:29PM -0700, Connor Behan wrote:
On 13/03/13 06:57 PM, oliver wrote:
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 02:56:35AM +0100, oliver wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 09:31:47PM -0400, Allen Li wrote:
[...]
Limiting repeated actions also sounds good (if someone really needs to,
30 matches
Mail list logo
