On 03/14/2013 04:01 AM, Daniel Wallace wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 12:05:04AM +, Xyne wrote:
>> Ionut Biru wrote:
>>
>>> mate, you did something wrong, stop trying to find out excuses
>>> for your actions.
>>>
>>> please do not delete builds like that anymore, leave comments
>>> about an
Den 13-03-2013 16:31, Daniel Micay skrev:
There have been exactly zero spammers on the ArchWiki since the
captcha was added for registration, the last time a user had to be
blocked was 2011.
I definitely think just trying out captchas for a while and see what
happens, is the way to go. If it's
oliver wrote:
>Delays in actions are worse than Captchas.
>
>If I do something, I want immediate feedback.
>Otherwise I assume the system is not working and I would try again...
>...maybe 3 or 5 or 10 times until I think "AUR is shit!", "Fuck Arch".
>
>Even Captchas allow immediate feedback, even
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 34 packages missing signoffs
* 14 packages older than 14 day
Please merge
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gitpython/ (orphan)
into
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-gitpython/
Both are the same project (having 1 repo on github and one on
gitorious (which links to github again) and it is a library, not an
application.
No packages dependend on
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 09:16:34 +0100, Johannes Dewender wrote:
>
> Please merge
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gitpython/ (orphan)
> into
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-gitpython/
>
> Both are the same project (having 1 repo on github and one on
> gitorious (which links to git
I don't think there is a problem with this package existing. Some
people don't want Gnome dependencies.
It would be nice if someone was maintaining the package, but it's not a
requirement. Also the previous maintainer has responded to your
comments with an explanation of why people might want t
Hi there,
Omoma [1] has been discontinued and replaced by another project [2].
May a TU delete the AUR package [3].
Thanks,
[1] https://code.google.com/p/omoma/
[2] https://github.com/tiramiseb/ospfm
[3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/omoma/
--
Cédric Girard
Hi,
Removed, thanks for reporting.
--
Sincerely,
Alexander Rødseth
xyproto / TU
I think that one captcha only, in the creation of an account, doesn't hurt.
And i liked the idea posted by Xyne, but with a few improvements: instead
of putting actions for TU's reviews, it should be an queue of actions by
users, so it can be undone rapidly and with one shot!
So, if a red light is
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 9:57 PM, Felix Yan wrote:
> I'd been using linux-ck for more than one year since I installed Arch for the
> first time (was using zen-kernel in Ubuntu before, mainly for BFS). I got
> rapid replies from graysky on the AUR comments (before I apply for a TU) and
> really h
On 14.03.2013 01:44, Xyne wrote:
> When flagged, comments and actions would be submitted to a queue that would be
> accessible to TUs via a webpage with accept/reject buttons for each action.
You could let other users which have already been whitelisted approve
actions. An action can require 3 app
Am Donnerstag 14 März 2013, 09:39:24 schrieb Anntoin Wilkinson:
> I don't think there is a problem with this package existing. Some
> people don't want Gnome dependencies.
>
> It would be nice if someone was maintaining the package, but it's not
> a requirement. Also the previous maintainer has re
Den 14-03-2013 16:41, Johannes Dewender skrev:
Am Donnerstag 14 März 2013, 09:39:24 schrieb Anntoin Wilkinson:
I don't think there is a problem with this package existing. Some
people don't want Gnome dependencies.
It would be nice if someone was maintaining the package, but it's not
a requirem
14 matches
Mail list logo
