Re: [aur-general] removal request

2013-04-02 Thread Felix Yan
On Tuesday, April 02, 2013 22:13:15 Schala Zeal wrote: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sheepshaver-cvs > > This has not only been superseded by sheepshaver-git, but the CVS repo > has been broken for over two years. Removed, thanks. Felix Yan Twitter: @felixonmars Wiki: http://felixc.at s

[aur-general] removal request

2013-04-02 Thread Schala Zeal
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sheepshaver-cvs This has not only been superseded by sheepshaver-git, but the CVS repo has been broken for over two years.

Re: [aur-general] Copy.com dueling packages

2013-04-02 Thread Limao Luo
On 04/02/2013 10:54 PM, Limao Luo wrote: On 04/02/2013 11:59 AM, Jonathan Arnold wrote: There are 2 packages for the Copy.com client software package: copy - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/copy/ copy-agent - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/copy-agent/ I think both have PKGBUILD problems

Re: [aur-general] Copy.com dueling packages

2013-04-02 Thread Limao Luo
On 04/02/2013 11:59 AM, Jonathan Arnold wrote: There are 2 packages for the Copy.com client software package: copy - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/copy/ copy-agent - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/copy-agent/ I think both have PKGBUILD problems, from dependencies (the Copy.com software

Re: [aur-general] Copy.com dueling packages

2013-04-02 Thread Limao Luo
On 04/02/2013 02:35 PM, Jelle van der Waa wrote: On 02/04/13 17:59, Jonathan Arnold wrote: There are 2 packages for the Copy.com client software package: copy - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/copy/ copy-agent - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/copy-agent/ I think both have PKGBUILD probl

Re: [aur-general] package rename request (java-service-wrapper)

2013-04-02 Thread Jonathan Steel
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 02:08:06PM -0400, skydrome wrote: > On 03/22/2013 11:26 AM, skydrome wrote: > >>> Im wondering if https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/java-service-wrapper > >>> should be renamed to java-service-wrapper -bin as it installs the > >>> precompiled wrapper binary > >>> > >>> And

Re: [aur-general] Copy.com dueling packages

2013-04-02 Thread Jonathan Arnold
On Tue, 02 Apr 2013 20:35:27 +0200 Jelle van der Waa wrote: > On 02/04/13 17:59, Jonathan Arnold wrote: > > There are 2 packages for the Copy.com client software package: > > > > copy - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/copy/ > > copy-agent - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/copy-agent/ > >

Re: [aur-general] Copy.com dueling packages

2013-04-02 Thread Jelle van der Waa
On 02/04/13 17:59, Jonathan Arnold wrote: > There are 2 packages for the Copy.com client software package: > > copy - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/copy/ > copy-agent - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/copy-agent/ > > I think both have PKGBUILD problems, from dependencies (the Copy.com > s

[aur-general] Copy.com dueling packages

2013-04-02 Thread Jonathan Arnold
There are 2 packages for the Copy.com client software package: copy - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/copy/ copy-agent - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/copy-agent/ I think both have PKGBUILD problems, from dependencies (the Copy.com software uses Qt4, not Gtk, for instance) to poorly forme

Re: [aur-general] Duplicate Package

2013-04-02 Thread Alucryd
On Mon, 2013-04-01 at 18:24 -0500, Nathan Owens wrote: > Just letting a TU know, that package > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/downloadm/ is the same as > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/downloadm-aria2/ > > The "downloadm" is the newest version availabile. It seems someone has already r

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

2013-04-02 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 5 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 29 packages missing signoffs * 4 packages older than 14 days