Please delete package gtk-theme-gnome-uncomplicated [1]
Replaced with correct name package gtk-theme-uncomplicated [2]
Sorry for the inconvenience, thanks.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-gnome-uncomplicated/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-uncomplicated/
Please disown https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fbdesk
= package out of date
= maintainer does not respond
--brian
On 11 April 2013 09:24, Frikilinux frikili...@gmail.com wrote:
Please delete package gtk-theme-gnome-uncomplicated [1]
Replaced with correct name package gtk-theme-uncomplicated [2]
Sorry for the inconvenience, thanks.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-gnome-uncomplicated/
THIS THREAD NEEDS SO MUCH MORE CAPSLOCK!!!1!1!!11!!!
scnr.
cheers!
mar77i
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 30 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 36 packages missing signoffs
* 6 packages older than 14
Please disown https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bbdock
= maintainer is long gone
= package needs to be updated for libpng12 to compile
= PKGBUILD needs to be split to build
-- brian
On 11 April 2013 00:01, Markus Bergholz marku...@gmail.com wrote:
So, it's done
http://git.osuv.de/aur/tree/testing/qucs-git
build is fine. but clemens was faster and has upload a complete broken
file! :)
You should remove the $srcdir/ prefix from the qucs-git source URL.
Other than that, it
On 04/11/13 at 11:57am, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
On 11 April 2013 00:01, Markus Bergholz marku...@gmail.com wrote:
So, it's done
http://git.osuv.de/aur/tree/testing/qucs-git
build is fine. but clemens was faster and has upload a complete broken
file! :)
You should remove the $srcdir/
Hi,
packages eos-movrec [1] and open-phd-guiding [2] have been replaced by
their counterparts with name ending in
Please, delete irpf2012[1]. I'm keeping a version with regular updates through
the package irpf[2]
This program is updated annually, and the previous version is discarded.Keep a
package using the year in name, is not a good idea.
Disown the package receitanet[3], He needs to be synchronized with
On 11/04/13 16:26, Lara Maia wrote:
Please, delete irpf2012[1]. I'm keeping a version with regular updates through
the package irpf[2]
This program is updated annually, and the previous version is discarded.Keep a
package using the year in name, is not a good idea.
Disown the package
Can you please remove python2-wsme [1]?
I tried to make it work but it turns out it has a lot of dependencies
that are not even in AUR.
Ward
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-wsme/
Please disown https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wmbattery
= out of date for over a year
= last updated close to 4 years ago
= upstream has released 2.41
= current maintainer does not respond to mail
-- brian
On 11/04/13 18:26, Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote:
Please disown https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wmbattery
= out of date for over a year
= last updated close to 4 years ago
= upstream has released 2.41
= current maintainer does not respond to mail
-- brian
Done, thanks
Please disown https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wmbiff/
= hasn't been updated in 4.5 years
= package doesn't build under makepkg 4.1.0
= package places manual pages in wrong directory
= maintainer does not respond to comments or mail
-- brian
On 11/04/13 18:55, Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote:
Please disown https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wmbiff/
= hasn't been updated in 4.5 years
= package doesn't build under makepkg 4.1.0
= package places manual pages in wrong directory
= maintainer does not respond to comments or mail
-- brian
16 matches
Mail list logo
