=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 118 packages missing signoffs
* 6 packages older than 14
Hello,
I would like to request that gstopwatch-git[1] gets removed from the AUR,
reason being that I have uploaded a new package gtimeutils-git[2] that contains
gstopwatch and another application as well (gtimer). In both cases, I am the
owner (and submitter) of the package.
[1]
Hi, could you remove kde-gtk-config [1]? it is already provided in community
[2]
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kde-gtk-config/
[2] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/?q=kde-gtk-config
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Sunday 28 April 2013 14:25:15 Jorge Barroso wrote:
Hi, could you remove kde-gtk-config [1]? it is already provided in community
Done
--
Andrea
Arch Linux Developer
Please, merge fontconfig-infinality-ultimate with
fontconfig-infinality-ultimate-git, transferring comments and votes. I have
recently released 'infinality-bundle' where one package uses the old name of my
AUR submission. In a few cases users reported problems during upgrade due to
identical names
On Sunday, April 28, 2013 18:18:05 bohoomil wrote:
Please, merge fontconfig-infinality-ultimate with
fontconfig-infinality-ultimate-git, transferring comments and votes. I have
recently released 'infinality-bundle' where one package uses the old name of
my
AUR submission. In a few cases
Hello
I accidently uploaded libgee-0.6, which is a suplicate of libgee06 in
[extra]. Please delete it.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libgee-0.6/
Best Regards Stefan
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Stefan Husmann
stefan-husm...@t-online.de wrote:
Hello
I accidently uploaded libgee-0.6, which is a suplicate of libgee06 in
[extra]. Please delete it.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libgee-0.6/
Best Regards Stefan
Thanks, deleted.
Hi,
i maintain both packages, i made changes to use the new qt4- prefixes
and new
locations, like the official Qt package did some weeks ago to co-exist with Qt5.
I would need some advice about how to direct the people using mingw32-qt to
mingw32-qt4, i have made a comment on mingw32-qt,
Dear TUs,
Please delete the following scikits packages:
[1,2,3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/scikits-rsformats/
[2,3,4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/scikits-timeseries-svn/
[1,2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/scikits-umfpack-svn/
[1] No longer part of scikits (
Hi,
The libsbsms package is now sbsms. There's no real history on libsbsms,
seeing as it's less than a day old, so you can just delete it rather
than merging.
Remove: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libsbsms/
Thanks!
*dp
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Devin J. Pohly djpohly+...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The libsbsms package is now sbsms. There's no real history on libsbsms,
seeing as it's less than a day old, so you can just delete it rather
than merging.
Remove: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libsbsms/
Hi,
the package golang [1] from AUR seem to be a duplicate of go [2] from the
official repositories. Same versions and everything.
I think the submitter didn't know. Would it be possible to remove it?
First Submitted:2013-04-23 15:31Last Updated:2013-04-24 12:06
[1]
Hi all,
I (andrewSC) would like to request ownership of gtk3-git (
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk3-git/) as it's been flagged
out-of-date for some time now. If it's also possible could gtk+-git (
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk%2B-git/) be deleted? Not only is
the '+' breaking
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Andrew Crerar asc9...@rit.edu wrote:
Hi all,
I (andrewSC) would like to request ownership of gtk3-git (
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk3-git/) as it's been flagged
out-of-date for some time now. If it's also possible could gtk+-git (
15 matches
Mail list logo