[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

2013-05-29 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 5 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 10 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days

[aur-general] Guake-Solarized-Colors

2013-05-29 Thread Agustin Ferrario
Hi I've made my first pkgbuild from scratch: https://github.com/py-crash/guake-solarized-Arch-Build Can somenone check it out and make the convinient critics before i uploaded to AUR?

Re: [aur-general] Guake-Solarized-Colors

2013-05-29 Thread Felix Yan
On Wednesday, May 29, 2013 07:08:16 Agustin Ferrario wrote: > Hi > I've made my first pkgbuild from scratch: > https://github.com/py-crash/guake-solarized-Arch-Build > Can somenone check it out and make the convinient critics before i > uploaded to AUR? git SCM source could use "git://github.co

Re: [aur-general] Guake-Solarized-Colors

2013-05-29 Thread Maxime Gauduin
On Wed, 2013-05-29 at 03:20 -0700, Felix Yan wrote: > On Wednesday, May 29, 2013 07:08:16 Agustin Ferrario wrote: > > Hi > > I've made my first pkgbuild from scratch: > > https://github.com/py-crash/guake-solarized-Arch-Build > > Can somenone check it out and make the convinient critics before i

Re: [aur-general] Guake-Solarized-Colors

2013-05-29 Thread Rashif Ray Rahman
On 29 May 2013 18:35, Maxime Gauduin wrote: > What Felix said. Also such a simple patch can be achieved with a sed > command. Just a note here: While the above is true for simple one-liners, I would recommend against getting in the habit of using sed to accomplish patching. A proper patch is much

Re: [aur-general] Guake-Solarized-Colors

2013-05-29 Thread Maxime Gauduin
On Wed, 2013-05-29 at 19:03 +0800, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote: > On 29 May 2013 18:35, Maxime Gauduin wrote: > > What Felix said. Also such a simple patch can be achieved with a sed > > command. > > Just a note here: While the above is true for simple one-liners, I > would recommend against getting

[aur-general] duplicate package/merge request python(2)-flask-mail

2013-05-29 Thread Zack Buhman
python-flask-mail [1] is both out of date and named improperly. python2-flask-mail [2] already exists, unfortunately, and is of negligibly higher quality (and up to date), so I suggest python-flask-mail [1] be merged into python2-flask-mail [2] (or however duplicate packages are normally handled)

[aur-general] AUR cleanup

2013-05-29 Thread Alexander
Please remove the following packages: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/antlr3.5/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/antlr3/ Both of them provide the same thing and can be replaced by the package in [extra]: https://www.archlinux.org/packages/ext

[aur-general] Disown request: umurmur

2013-05-29 Thread Robert Knauer
Hello, could you please disown umurmur[1]? It's outdated for more than a year now, the PKGBUILD is against the guidelines (no package(), || return 1, no quotes, ...) and I have a working PKGBUILD for the newest version and with systemd support. Regards, Robert. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packa

Re: [aur-general] AUR cleanup

2013-05-29 Thread Bartłomiej Piotrowski
On 2013-05-29 17:06, Alexander wrote: > Please remove the following packages: > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/antlr3.5/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/antlr3/ > > > Both of them provide the same thing and can be replaced by the package >

Re: [aur-general] duplicate package/merge request python(2)-flask-mail

2013-05-29 Thread Bartłomiej Piotrowski
On 2013-05-29 15:40, Zack Buhman wrote: > python-flask-mail [1] is both out of date and named improperly. > python2-flask-mail [2] already exists, unfortunately, and is of > negligibly higher quality (and up to date), so I suggest > python-flask-mail [1] be merged into python2-flask-mail [2] (or ho

Re: [aur-general] Disown request: umurmur

2013-05-29 Thread Bartłomiej Piotrowski
On 2013-05-29 17:39, Robert Knauer wrote: > Hello, > could you please disown umurmur[1]? > It's outdated for more than a year now, the PKGBUILD is against the > guidelines (no package(), || return 1, no quotes, ...) and I have a > working PKGBUILD for the newest version and with systemd support. >

[aur-general] deletion request

2013-05-29 Thread Moritz Rudert (helios)
Hi, please delete ffingerd [1] because the author says [2] that it needs to be rewritten. greetings helios [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ffingerd/ [2] http://www.fefe.de/ffingerd/

[aur-general] deletion request: luasocket2-hg

2013-05-29 Thread Moritz Rudert (helios)
Hi, please delete luasocket2-hg [1] because it has been replaced by luasocket-git [2]. greetings helios [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/luasocket2-hg/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/luasocket-git/

Re: [aur-general] Guake-Solarized-Colors

2013-05-29 Thread Agustin Ferrario
On 05/29/2013 08:05 AM, Maxime Gauduin wrote: Of course, seding multiple lines would be quite inconvenient anyway, especially when they're not just substitutions. I made the push with Maxime's PKGBUILD but i'll continue using the patch since i know how to use diff and patch properly but i've no