=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 2 packages missing signoffs
* 2 packages older than 14 days
llvm-amdgpu-svn (1) lib32-llvm-amdgpu-svn (2) were needed to build
mesa-git master versions.
llvm 3.3 is now in the official repos and built with amdgpu / R600 enabled
and mesa-git master builds fine against that version, so these 2 packages
are no longer needed.
Please delete (1) and (2) .
(1)
On 17 June 2013 15:36, Lone_Wolf lonew...@xs4all.nl wrote:
llvm-amdgpu-svn (1) lib32-llvm-amdgpu-svn (2) were needed to build
mesa-git master versions.
llvm 3.3 is now in the official repos and built with amdgpu / R600 enabled
and mesa-git master builds fine against that version, so these 2
Stuntrally-bin (1) is orphaned, outdated and the [community] repo has an
uptodate version (2) .
Please delete stuntrally-bin
Lone_Wolf
(1) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/stuntrally-bin/
(2) https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/stuntrally/
On Monday, June 17, 2013 16:42:52 Lone_Wolf wrote:
Stuntrally-bin (1) is orphaned, outdated and the [community] repo has an
uptodate version (2) .
Please delete stuntrally-bin
Lone_Wolf
(1) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/stuntrally-bin/
(2)
Dear TU(s),
the recent move of these packages' VCS from svn to git means that - as
the maintainer - I had to create two new packages for them (as per
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/VCS_PKGBUILD_Guidelines). I would
like to request for the new two packages (*-git) to be merged with their
We have these packages
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rtmpdump-git/
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rtmpdump-svn/
and both giving the same upstream url:
http://rtmpdump.mplayerhq.hu/
where it says: Download the source:
*git clone git://git.ffmpeg.org/rtmpdump *
but both are fairly
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/clementine-rc/
has been superseded by the final release in community
I suggest removal from the AUR
On 17/06/13 10:01 AM, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
Dear TU(s),
the recent move of these packages' VCS from svn to git means that - as
the maintainer - I had to create two new packages for them (as per
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/VCS_PKGBUILD_Guidelines). I would
like to request for the
On 17/06/13 11:29 AM, Rob Til Freedmen wrote:
We have these packages
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rtmpdump-git/
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rtmpdump-svn/
and both giving the same upstream url:
http://rtmpdump.mplayerhq.hu/
where it says: Download the source:
*git clone
On 17/06/13 12:05 PM, Rob Til Freedmen wrote:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/clementine-rc/
has been superseded by the final release in community
I suggest removal from the AUR
Removed, thanks!
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
PLease merge libefivar-git [1] into efivar-git [2]. The packagewas
renamed since upstream was renamed from libefivar to efivar. Thanks in
advance.
[1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libefivar-git/
[2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/efivar-git/
Best Regards.
Keshav Padram
On 17/06/13 01:14 PM, Keshav Padram wrote:
Hi,
PLease merge libefivar-git [1] into efivar-git [2]. The packagewas
renamed since upstream was renamed from libefivar to efivar. Thanks in
advance.
[1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libefivar-git/
[2]:
Hello,
I had previously released a package named xmppflask, but according to they
installation guide -http://xmppflask.org/intro.html#installation- I have
made a second one based on mercurial, and according to AUR's standards I
have renamed it xmppflask-hg
so, as the first one -xmppflask- is now
On 18 June 2013 03:07, Mo0O mo0ofier mo0of...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I had previously released a package named xmppflask, but according to they
installation guide -http://xmppflask.org/intro.html#installation- I have
made a second one based on mercurial, and according to AUR's standards I
Hello guys,
I'd like to request the deletion of g95-cocon from AUR
(https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/g95-cocon/). The original developer
deprecated the network console (the software of this package alongside a custom
g95 binnary) and therefore, this package is no longer usefull.
Thanks in
On Monday, June 17, 2013 18:51:01 Eduardo Martins Lopes wrote:
Hello guys,
I'd like to request the deletion of g95-cocon from AUR
(https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/g95-cocon/). The original developer
deprecated the network console (the software of this package alongside a
custom g95
17 matches
Mail list logo