[aur-general] Merge request: thunar plugins

2013-06-30 Thread Diego Principe
Good morning please merge the following outdated devel versions https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/thunar-volman-devel/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/thunar-vfs-devel/ into git versions https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/thunar-volman-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/thunar-vfs-git/

Re: [aur-general] Merge request: thunar plugins

2013-06-30 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On 30 June 2013 09:19, Diego Principe cdprinc...@gmail.com wrote: Good morning please merge the following outdated devel versions https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/thunar-volman-devel/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/thunar-vfs-devel/ into git versions

[aur-general] Dropping of smc and smc-data

2013-06-30 Thread Laurent Carlier
smc and smc-data will be moved AUR soon cegui will be updated to last version and smc doesn't support it. Current version is already patched for cegui in community, and upstream hasn't release new smc version for years. Regards -- Laurent Carlier ArchLinux Developer http://www.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Merge/Removal request: thunar

2013-06-30 Thread Diego Principe
I believe that is not useful to have a non-maintained and old development version for thunar... I think that they should be merged keeping the git version https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/thunar-devel/ into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/thunar-git And these are very old and patched

Re: [aur-general] Merge/Removal request: thunar

2013-06-30 Thread Diego Principe
2013/6/30 Diego Principe cdprinc...@gmail.com I believe that is not useful to have a non-maintained and old development version for thunar... I think that they should be merged keeping the git version https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/thunar-devel/ into

[aur-general] Deletion package stegano-git

2013-06-30 Thread Simone Solinas
Hi, I ask the deletion of the package *Stegano-git* due to the change of name. -- Simone Solinas

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

2013-06-30 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days

[aur-general] move split2flac-git to split2flac

2013-06-30 Thread member graysky
Upstream has finally started tagging releases. Please replace the git package with the standard one I just uploaded. Thanks!

[aur-general] Orphan request: dfu-util

2013-06-30 Thread Øyvind Heggstad
dfu-util[1] needs updating and the current maintainer is not responding to comments nor email (email sent 20130618) [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dfu-util/

[aur-general] Merge request: win7-8 theme

2013-06-30 Thread Diego Principe
Please merge https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/win7-8-theme/ in https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-win7-8/ Diego

[aur-general] Merge request : php-gtk

2013-06-30 Thread Xorg
Hello, Please merge php-gtk (package is old, orphan, dependencies are bad and package can't compile) into php-gtk-git. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/php-gtk/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/php-gtk-git/ Best Regards X0rg Portion de message joint Description: PGP signature

[aur-general] Removal request

2013-06-30 Thread Evan Teitelman
Could you please merge 'xsser' (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xsser/) into 'xsser-svn' (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xsser-svn/)? The original 'xsser' package should have been named 'xsser-svn'. The original uploader made a new package called 'xsser-svn' and disowned 'xsser'.

Re: [aur-general] Icons pack naming guidelines

2013-06-30 Thread Edoardo Maria Elidoro
Well, I found only almost 100 packages with $name-icon-theme. I think it would be safe to modify/create a rule so that the new packages need to be: icon-theme-$name(-$de) As soon as we finish the discussion I can contact every maintainer and point he/she to this conversation and to the new

Re: [aur-general] Icons pack naming guidelines

2013-06-30 Thread Jerome Leclanche
You should double-check some other icon themes which ship as *-icons. Eg. oxygen-icons. J. Leclanche On 30 June 2013 23:54, Edoardo Maria Elidoro edoardo.elid...@gmail.comwrote: Well, I found only almost 100 packages with $name-icon-theme. I think it would be safe to modify/create a rule so

[aur-general] Removal requests

2013-06-30 Thread Karol Blazewicz
Source gone https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/indicator-lookit/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/imwheel-enchanced/ - the diff is gone, w/o it it's a plain imwheel: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/imwheel/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ispell-czech/

Re: [aur-general] Icons pack naming guidelines

2013-06-30 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
On 2013-06-29 15:07, Alex Charron wrote: I think that we should modify the convention so that it goes as icon-theme-*, gtk-theme-*, etc. so that it sorts better. What do you mean by sort better? What difference is there between icon-theme-* and *-icon-theme? AUR has search, so it's pretty

Re: [aur-general] move split2flac-git to split2flac

2013-06-30 Thread William Giokas
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 07:44:14AM -0400, graysky wrote: Upstream has finally started tagging releases. Please replace the git package with the standard one I just uploaded. Thanks! I see no reason to do this. Set up a good pkgver function using git describe and have it conflict with the