On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Edoardo Maria Elidoro
edoardo.elid...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm writing here just to have some feedback about this issue and
maybe to encourage someone to adopt it and fix it. I don't feel like
it's something I will be able to do otherwise I'd have already adopted
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 14 packages missing signoffs
* 12 packages older than 14
On 19 July 2013 20:40, Anatol Pomozov anatol.pomo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
And that is what email notifications for.
They are good when someone flags our package out of date. But after
that it is easy to forget about it.
I don't think that *manual* mass orphaning is a good idea. There
should
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 1:37 AM, Martti Kühne mysat...@gmail.com wrote:
It's dead, that's what's wrong with it. [0] is down, both feeds and
tweets empty in [1].
[0] http://gitweb.compiz.org/
[1] http://www.compiz.org/
Not quite dead yet. You are just not looking the right place[a] where
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 6:49 AM, Pedro Alejandro López-Valencia
palop...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 1:37 AM, Martti Kühne mysat...@gmail.com wrote:
It's dead, that's what's wrong with it. [0] is down, both feeds and
tweets empty in [1].
[0] http://gitweb.compiz.org/
[1]
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Dicebot pub...@dicebot.lv wrote:
It is nothing of real importance but question is, what harm does
explicit versioning do?
Correct me if I overlooked it, but from what I have read here, but I
have yet to see an argument that applies to the specific case here.
On 07/22/2013 01:56 PM, Martti Kühne wrote:
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Dicebot pub...@dicebot.lv wrote:
It is nothing of real importance but question is, what harm does
explicit versioning do?
Correct me if I overlooked it, but from what I have read here, but I
have yet to see an
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 11:07:51 +0200
From: l.jirkov...@gmail.com
To: aur-general@archlinux.org
Subject: Re: [aur-general] About orphaning all packages of inactive users
On 19 July 2013 20:40, Anatol Pomozov anatol.pomo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
And
Could you please remove 'rfidiot'
(https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rfidiot/) and rename
'rfidiot-kali-git' to 'rfidiot-git'?
On Monday, July 22, 2013 21:57:58 Evan Teitelman wrote:
Could you please remove 'rfidiot'
(https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rfidiot/) and rename
'rfidiot-kali-git' to 'rfidiot-git'?
Oh btw there's no rfidiot-git package now, please upload it first so I could do
a merge.
Regards,
Felix Yan
On Monday, July 22, 2013 21:57:58 Evan Teitelman wrote:
Could you please remove 'rfidiot'
(https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rfidiot/) and rename
'rfidiot-kali-git' to 'rfidiot-git'?
Done.
Please include links to all the packages you mentioned next time, thanks.
Regards,
Felix Yan
This[1] is my package and I will only be maintaining the git version.
Thanks.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/simpfand/
--
hsp
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 23:06:02 -0500
From: hongshick@gmail.com
To: aur-general@archlinux.org
Subject: [aur-general] Removal Request
This[1] is my package and I will only be maintaining the git version.
Thanks.
[1]
13 matches
Mail list logo
