Martti Kühne wrote:
>things won't be eaten as hot as they were cooked here.
Off-topic: I thought that was a really nice expression. Is it idiomatic where
you're from?
Regards,
Xyne
On Sat, 2013-07-27 at 07:04 +, Xyne wrote:
> Martti Kühne wrote:
>
> >things won't be eaten as hot as they were cooked here.
>
> Off-topic: I thought that was a really nice expression. Is it idiomatic where
> you're from?
It's a German idiom. http://www.dict.cc/?s=nicht+so+hei%C3%9F+gegessen
On 2013-07-26 17:59, Emil Lundberg wrote:
> Package eminent-git (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/eminent-git/) is
> orphaned, last updated in 2010 and flagged out of date since 2013-04-15.
> Its de facto successor is the eminent-awesome-3.5-git package.
>
> /Emil Lundberg
>
What's the problem
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 2 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days
Hi,
moc-ape[1], moc-pulseaudio[2], moc-unstable-ape[3] are being orphaned,
and they're the same package as moc in the official repository.
Thanks.
Iru Cai
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/moc-ape/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/moc-pulseaudio/
[3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages
There's no problem, I just thought I'd suggest deletion of an orphaned,
out-of-date package [1] since there is another package
(eminent-awesome-3.5-git [2]) that provides the same functionality, has a
maintainer and is up to date. Much the same as Alessio Sergi did on Jul 24
about the dropbox-uploa
Could you please merge 'rfidiot-kali-git'
(https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rfidiot-kali-git/) into
'rfidiot-git' (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rfidiot-git/)?
Could you please merge 'wpscan-svn'
(https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wpscan-svn/) into 'wpscan-git'
(https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wpscan-git/)?
On Saturday, July 27, 2013 09:49:13 Evan Teitelman wrote:
> Could you please merge 'rfidiot-kali-git'
> (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rfidiot-kali-git/) into
> 'rfidiot-git' (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rfidiot-git/)?
Merged, thanks.
BTW, please assign a category for rfidiot-git inst
On Saturday, July 27, 2013 09:50:28 Evan Teitelman wrote:
> Could you please merge 'wpscan-svn'
> (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wpscan-svn/) into 'wpscan-git'
> (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wpscan-git/)?
Merged, thanks.
BTW, please update makedepends "subversion" to "git" accordingly
On 2013-07-27 09:33 +0200
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>On Sat, 2013-07-27 at 07:04 +, Xyne wrote:
>> Martti Kühne wrote:
>>
>> >things won't be eaten as hot as they were cooked here.
>>
>> Off-topic: I thought that was a really nice expression. Is it idiomatic where
>> you're from?
>
>It's a German
On 2013-07-27 20:04 +0800
Iru Cai wrote:
>Hi,
>moc-ape[1], moc-pulseaudio[2], moc-unstable-ape[3] are being orphaned,
>and they're the same package as moc in the official repository.
>
>Thanks.
>Iru Cai
>
>[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/moc-ape/
>[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/moc
> From: chirantan.ekb...@gmail.com
> To: aur-general@archlinux.org
> Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 21:53:59 -0700
> Subject: [aur-general] gettext and intl directory
>
> Hello,
>
> I am the maintainer for the git version of Midnight Commander[1]. Since
> the releas
On 20.07.2013 15:48, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
> On 15.07.2013 22:31, Dicebot wrote:
>> [sponsor : Sven-Hendrik Haase]
>> [AUR account : https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Dicebot]
>> [IRC : Dicebot @ irc.freenode.net]
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Long story short - I am insterested in becoming a
On Saturday, July 27, 2013 18:31:23 Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
> On 20.07.2013 15:48, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
> > On 15.07.2013 22:31, Dicebot wrote:
> >> [sponsor : Sven-Hendrik Haase]
> >> [AUR account : https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Dicebot]
> >> [IRC : Dicebot @ irc.freenode.ne
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 6:44 PM, Felix Yan wrote:
> On Saturday, July 27, 2013 18:31:23 Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
> > On 20.07.2013 15:48, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
> > > On 15.07.2013 22:31, Dicebot wrote:
> > >> [sponsor : Sven-Hendrik Haase]
> > >> [AUR account : https://aur.archlinux.org/
On 07/27/2013 06:31 PM, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
>> Discussion period has ended. Start the voting:
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=69
> Le voting period has ended. Dicebot-san is now officially Dicebot-sama!
> Let's perform our ritual new-TU-group-hug. Congratulations!
Thanks!
Guess this ans
On 07/27/2013 10:09 AM, Dicebot wrote:
> On 07/27/2013 06:31 PM, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
>>> Discussion period has ended. Start the voting:
>>> https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=69
>> Le voting period has ended. Dicebot-san is now officially Dicebot-sama!
>> Let's perform our ritual new-TU-group-h
Le samedi 27 juillet 2013 19:09:21 Dicebot a écrit :
> On 07/27/2013 06:31 PM, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
> >> Discussion period has ended. Start the voting:
> >> https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=69
> >
> > Le voting period has ended. Dicebot-san is now officially Dicebot-sama!
> > Let's perform ou
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 7:28 PM, Laurent Carlier wrote:
> Le samedi 27 juillet 2013 19:09:21 Dicebot a écrit :
>> On 07/27/2013 06:31 PM, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
>> >> Discussion period has ended. Start the voting:
>> >> https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=69
>> >
>> > Le voting period has ended. D
On 2013-07-27 18:31, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
> On 20.07.2013 15:48, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
>> On 15.07.2013 22:31, Dicebot wrote:
>>> [sponsor : Sven-Hendrik Haase]
>>> [AUR account : https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Dicebot]
>>> [IRC : Dicebot @ irc.freenode.net]
>>>
>>> Hello,
>
On 2013-07-27 18:31 +0200
Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
>> Discussion period has ended. Start the voting:
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=69
>Le voting period has ended. Dicebot-san is now officially Dicebot-sama!
>Let's perform our ritual new-TU-group-hug. Congratulations!
I'm sorry to have to p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/27/2013 07:53 PM, Xyne wrote:
> I voted yes, so I do want this to pass, but if we just ignore the
> bylaws whenever it's convenient then there's not much point to
> having bylaws. We could hold a vote to make an exception in this
> instance, but
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Xyne wrote:
> On 2013-07-27 18:31 +0200
> Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
>
>>> Discussion period has ended. Start the voting:
>>> https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=69
>>Le voting period has ended. Dicebot-san is now officially Dicebot-sama!
>>Let's perform our ritual new
On 28 July 2013 01:53, Xyne wrote:
> I'm sorry to have to point this out, but the proposal has not been accepted
> according to our bylaws.
Xyne, thank you for actively verifying the result of the vote. You
remind me of Loui, who used to be very particular about these things.
We simply cannot ign
On 2013-07-27 20:49, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote:
> according to this list, we have 36 active TUs.
Actually I see 35 TUs there, 33 without Daenyth and xyproto.
It seems like a good opportunity to determine what does "active TU" mean
– some Trusted Users, even if active in packaging terms, simply igno
On 28 July 2013 02:49, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote:
> We simply cannot ignore the bylaws. This serves as a reminder to show
> us all the numbers when declaring results.
And I failed to provide that myself:
24/36 = 0.66 ... = ~0.67 > 0.66
> according to this list, we have 36 active TUs.
s/have/woul
> Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 17:53:52 +
> From: x...@archlinux.ca
> To: aur-general@archlinux.org
> Subject: Re: [aur-general] TU application
>
...
> I thought that was a low number of votes given the recent influx of TUs, so I
> checked the total number of
28 matches
Mail list logo
