=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 2 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days
Hello fellow Archers,
Does anyone by any chance have the original vlock source code?
A while back, community/vlock was taken in by core/kbd because vlock
upstream was dead. This should have been a good thing, but it is not a
good thing because the kbd version of vlock is missing important
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 03:28:48PM -0400, Allen Li wrote:
Hello fellow Archers,
Does anyone by any chance have the original vlock source code?
A while back, community/vlock was taken in by core/kbd because vlock
upstream was dead. This should have been a good thing, but it is not a
good
As the current maintainer, I'd like to ask for deletion of the package
linux-aufs_friendly-stbl[1] from the AUR. As I learned, it does not
comply with the AUR guidelines, since it is essentially the same as the
linux-aufs_friendly[2] package.
Thanks,
Martin
[1]
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 04:19:12PM -0400, Dave Reisner wrote:
What features are missing? Why not contact the Altlinux folks who
maintain kbd and discuss how they can be re-added?
The -n and -s options that allow vlock to be used within an X session to
lock all consoles.
This has already been
On Sunday, July 28, 2013 20:31:04 m...@strahlungsfrei.de wrote:
As the current maintainer, I'd like to ask for deletion of the package
linux-aufs_friendly-stbl[1] from the AUR. As I learned, it does not
comply with the AUR guidelines, since it is essentially the same as the
