> Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 16:16:16 -0500
> From: palop...@gmail.com
> To: aur-general@archlinux.org
> Subject: Re: [aur-general] Removal request: torrenstream
>
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Jonas Heinrich
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> please remove AUR packa
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Dave Reisner wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 08:51:59PM +0200, Rob Til Freedmen wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Dave Reisner wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 08:15:06PM +0200, Lukas Jirkovsky wrote:
> > > > On 30 July 2013 19:56, Rob Til Free
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Jonas Heinrich
wrote:
> Hello,
> please remove AUR package "torrentstream" [1] since it's deprecated and
> replaced by the program acestream [2].
> Thank you,
> Jonas
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/torrentstream/
> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/package
On 2013-07-30 15:40, Ofir Balas wrote:
I feel like a free for all tag system would end with a bunch of trolls
spamming the AUR.
Perhaps, and that's one of the downsides of tagging. My point was really
that setting a category is a piece of cake for a maintainer to do. It
takes about three second
I feel like a free for all tag system would end with a bunch of trolls
spamming the AUR.
On Jul 30, 2013 9:34 PM, "Sam Stuewe" wrote:
> On 2013-07-30 14:47, Dave Reisner wrote:
>
>> The current search interface might be insufficient and not optimal
>>> regarding categories,
>>> but should be cons
On 2013-07-30 14:47, Dave Reisner wrote:
The current search interface might be insufficient and not optimal
regarding categories,
but should be consistent and predictably - which it isn't now.
I tend to agree with the consensus that categories are meaningless,
unmaintainable crap.
I rather fit
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 08:51:59PM +0200, Rob Til Freedmen wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Dave Reisner wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 08:15:06PM +0200, Lukas Jirkovsky wrote:
> > > On 30 July 2013 19:56, Rob Til Freedmen
> > wrote:
> > > > There are still >1000 packages without
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Dave Reisner wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 08:15:06PM +0200, Lukas Jirkovsky wrote:
> > On 30 July 2013 19:56, Rob Til Freedmen
> wrote:
> > > There are still >1000 packages without 'Category'
> > > - apparently not a hot topic.
> >
> > I think most of these p
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 08:15:06PM +0200, Lukas Jirkovsky wrote:
> On 30 July 2013 19:56, Rob Til Freedmen wrote:
> > There are still >1000 packages without 'Category'
> > - apparently not a hot topic.
>
> I think most of these packages are created by uploading the PKGBUILD
> using burp or a simi
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Daniel Micay wrote:
> I think descriptions and dependencies include the required information
> in almost every case.
>
Searching in a pool of >4 packages naturally leads to using
a category in which to search for, doesn't it?
And packages without category woul
I think tags would be cool but really not worth the effort. Like Dan said,
descriptions are king.
On Jul 30, 2013 7:17 PM, "Daniel Micay" wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Lukas Jirkovsky
> wrote:
> > On 30 July 2013 19:56, Rob Til Freedmen
> wrote:
> >> There are still >1000 packages w
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Lukas Jirkovsky wrote:
> On 30 July 2013 19:56, Rob Til Freedmen wrote:
>> There are still >1000 packages without 'Category'
>> - apparently not a hot topic.
>
> I think most of these packages are created by uploading the PKGBUILD
> using burp or a similar AUR upl
The only really interesting category imo is the games one. And even that is
mostly pointless. Who really searches the AUR by category after all.
On Jul 30, 2013 7:01 PM, "Daniel Micay" wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Rob Til Freedmen
> wrote:
> > There are still >1000 packages without
On 30 July 2013 19:56, Rob Til Freedmen wrote:
> There are still >1000 packages without 'Category'
> - apparently not a hot topic.
I think most of these packages are created by uploading the PKGBUILD
using burp or a similar AUR uploader. If the categories were to stay
[1], it would be good if the
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Rob Til Freedmen
wrote:
> There are still >1000 packages without 'Category'
> - apparently not a hot topic.
>
> Maybe we add another line to Statistics on the AUR front page just to
> let users know of packages not found by the package search function
> - unless se
There are still >1000 packages without 'Category'
- apparently not a hot topic.
Maybe we add another line to Statistics on the AUR front page just to
let users know of packages not found by the package search function
- unless searched by using 'Category=All', clicked on 'Category' and
reading all
Op dinsdag 30 juli 2013 16:46:57 schreef Jonas Heinrich:
> Hello,
> please remove AUR package "torrentstream" [1] since it's deprecated and
> replaced by the program acestream [2].
> Thank you,
> Jonas
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/torrentstream/
> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packag
Hello,
please remove AUR package "torrentstream" [1] since it's deprecated and
replaced by the program acestream [2].
Thank you,
Jonas
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/torrentstream/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?K=acestream
pgpgqvRwEkpYc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Op dinsdag 30 juli 2013 08:00:12 schreef george:
> hi.i own https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/haskell-haxml/
>
> this package need uptade.(new version available on upstream)
>
> But it's depend other orphans haskell package(s) thats need update.
>
> e.g https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/haske
Hi,
I sneak-voted with a mobile phone while temporarily inactive and on vacation.
- Alexander / xyproto
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 108 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 114 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 d
hi.i own https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/haskell-haxml/
this package need uptade.(new version available on upstream)
But it's depend other orphans haskell package(s) thats need update.
e.g https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/haskell-polyparse/
i don't know haskell.
The reasons of above i wa
22 matches
Mail list logo
