=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 14 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 32 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14
Please remove the maven-3.1.0 package [1] as the official maven
package [2] is now updated to 3.1.0 version.
[1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/maven-3.1.0/
[2]: https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/maven/
Thanks
--
Caution: breathing may be hazardous to your health.
#include
In the future, please do not upload packages like this.
On Aug 12, 2013 8:19 AM, Leonidas Spyropoulos artafi...@gmail.com wrote:
Please remove the maven-3.1.0 package [1] as the official maven
package [2] is now updated to 3.1.0 version.
[1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/maven-3.1.0/
Hello Dave,
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Dave Reisner d...@falconindy.com wrote:
In the future, please do not upload packages like this.
Could you please explain me where I actioned wrongly so in the future
I act accordingly?
On Aug 12, 2013 8:19 AM, Leonidas Spyropoulos
On Monday, August 12, 2013 13:19:14 Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
Please remove the maven-3.1.0 package [1] as the official maven
package [2] is now updated to 3.1.0 version.
[1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/maven-3.1.0/
[2]: https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/maven/
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 01:40:56PM +0100, Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
Hello Dave,
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Dave Reisner d...@falconindy.com wrote:
In the future, please do not upload packages like this.
Could you please explain me where I actioned wrongly so in the future
I act
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 07:02:51PM -0300, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote:
[...]
An exception to the standard removal procedure is made if a TU has not
done
ANY of the following for a period of at least 2 months:
1. added, removed or updated a package in +[community]+ or the AUR
Hello TUs,
after a discussion with the affected maintainers we decided it would be best to
remove cndrvcups-capt and cndrvcups-common in favor of capt-src
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/cndrvcups-capt/
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/cndrvcups-common/
Lukas Jirkovsky wrote:
I can't obviously comment on grammar as I'm not a native speaker, so I
have just a single comment. I think it may be better to split this
into two commits, one containing the little changes like referring to
trusted users as TUs or explicitly mentioning the aur-general and
Op maandag 12 augustus 2013 00:26:55 schreef Antonio Arias:
Hello TUs,
Can someone merge the package 'photo' [1] in 'photoqt' [2] because author
has changed the name of program.(photo was too generic)
I am the maintainer of 'photoqt'.
Thanks and best regards,
archtux
[1]
Op maandag 12 augustus 2013 19:04:43 schreef Karl-Robert Ernst:
Hello TUs,
after a discussion with the affected maintainers we decided it would be best
to remove cndrvcups-capt and cndrvcups-common in favor of capt-src
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/cndrvcups-capt/
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Evan Teitelman teitelmane...@gmail.comwrote:
Please merge last.fm[1] into lastfm[2].
Both packages provide the same tool. The last.fm package is unmaintained
and
its PKGBUILD file is a mess.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/last.fm/
[2]
Please merge xhp[1] into xhp-git[2].
This package was named incorrectly.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xhp/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xhp-git/
Hi everyone,
There is an old plover-bzr package [1] in the AUR that I adopted
today. Development for Plover has been migrated to GitHub in 2011 [2]
[3]. I therefore created a new package called plover-git [4]. Could
the votes and comments from plover-bzr be merged into plover-git?
Footnotes:
Please merge bdsm[1] and bdsm-git[2] into sm-git[3].
This project has been renamed.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bdsm/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bdsm-git/
[3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sm-git/
Hello all,
the drawterm package (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/drawterm/) is
currently out-of date, and its name does not reflect the fact that it pulls
from a mercurial repository. I emailed the owner a little more than two
weeks ago, and they have not responded.
I have commented on the
On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 23:39:46 +0200
Joren Van Onder joren.vanon...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
There is an old plover-bzr package [1] in the AUR that I adopted
today. Development for Plover has been migrated to GitHub in 2011 [2]
[3]. I therefore created a new package called plover-git
On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 16:55:55 -0400
Evan Teitelman teitelmane...@gmail.com wrote:
Please merge xhp[1] into xhp-git[2].
This package was named incorrectly.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xhp/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xhp-git/
Done, thanks.
- speps -
On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 18:23:45 -0400
Evan Teitelman teitelmane...@gmail.com wrote:
Please merge bdsm[1] and bdsm-git[2] into sm-git[3].
This project has been renamed.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bdsm/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bdsm-git/
[3]
On Aug 12, 2013 4:44 PM, Marshall Conover marzhal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
the drawterm package (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/drawterm/) is
currently out-of date, and its name does not reflect the fact that it
pulls
from a mercurial repository. I emailed the owner a little
On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 19:44:27 -0400
Marshall Conover marzhal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
the drawterm package (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/drawterm/) is
currently out-of date, and its name does not reflect the fact that it pulls
from a mercurial repository. I emailed the owner a
21 matches
Mail list logo
