[aur-general] Removal request sleuthkit++

2013-08-20 Thread Levente Polyak
Please delete aur/sleuthkit++ (3.2.3) as it is an orphaned outdated duplicate of community/sleuthkit (4.0.2). https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sleuthkit++ Best regards, Levente

Re: [aur-general] Remove some of my packages

2013-08-20 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On 20 August 2013 22:57, François Boulogne wrote: > Hi, > > A cleaning request: > * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-sphinx-to-github/ : useless > because of github's evolution, as explained on the project homepage. > * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/zimarchivist/ : a personal project

[aur-general] Remove some of my packages

2013-08-20 Thread François Boulogne
Hi, A cleaning request: * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-sphinx-to-github/ : useless because of github's evolution, as explained on the project homepage. * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/zimarchivist/ : a personal project (unfinished), I'm gonna to delete * https://aur.archlinux.org

Re: [aur-general] Merge request for winerar-kde4 into kde-servicemenus-winerar

2013-08-20 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On 20/08/13 20:03, Antonio Arias wrote: > Hello TUs, > > Can someone merge the package 'winerar-kde4' [1] into > 'kde-servicemenus-winerar' [2] because of KDE servicemenus package naming > standards? > > Thanks and best regards, > > archtux > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/winerar-kde

[aur-general] Merge request for winerar-kde4 into kde-servicemenus-winerar

2013-08-20 Thread Antonio Arias
Hello TUs, Can someone merge the package 'winerar-kde4' [1] into 'kde-servicemenus-winerar' [2] because of KDE servicemenus package naming standards? Thanks and best regards, archtux [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/winerar-kde4/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kde-servicemenus-win

[aur-general] Deletion request

2013-08-20 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
Please delete https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/imaplib2. I must have accidentally uploaded it, and https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-imaplib2/ is the real thing. No votes or comments, so no point in merging. -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera pgpMw90a2yoMD.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

2013-08-20 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On 20 August 2013 19:46, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote: > Please delete https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/imaplib2. > > I must have accidentally uploaded it, and > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-imaplib2/ is the real thing. Removed, thanks.

[aur-general] [tu-bylaws] [PATCH 1/2] Add note on when the number of TUs is recorded

2013-08-20 Thread Lukas Fleischer
The quorum section does not mention when the number of TUs is recorded. Add a note that this is done at the beginning of the voting period. This makes it easy to implement automated quorum calculation in the AUR. Signed-off-by: Lukas Fleischer --- tu-bylaws.txt | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 inserti

[aur-general] [tu-bylaws] [PATCH 2/2] Add details on patch submissions

2013-08-20 Thread Lukas Fleischer
* Mention the tu-bylaws.git repository. * Mention Git-formatted patches and subject keywords. * Promote `git send-email`. * Add note on submitting several patches at once. Signed-off-by: Lukas Fleischer --- tu-bylaws.txt | 23 +++ 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions

[aur-general] [tu-bylaws] [PATCH 0/2] TU bylaws amendment

2013-08-20 Thread Lukas Fleischer
Ok, sending this before the voting period for Xyne's proposal is over since it is already clear that it will be accepted. More than 65% of all TUs voted "yes" and there are zero "no" votes so far :) The first patch is a follow-up to Xyne's proposal and is something he simply forgot when writing th

Re: [aur-general] Delete requests

2013-08-20 Thread Julien Nicoulaud
You are looking at the develop branch. The last stable release (0.6.4) needs requests < 1.0: https://github.com/Diaoul/subliminal/blob/0.6.4/requirements.txt Julien 2013/8/19 Jerome Leclanche > The dependency can be dropped, 0.6.3 depends on requests>=1.1. > > cf. https://github.com/Diaoul/sub